Using Offender Risk Assessment Data to Explore Nonfatal Strangulation in the Context of Community Supervision.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Durant Frantzen
{"title":"Using Offender Risk Assessment Data to Explore Nonfatal Strangulation in the Context of Community Supervision.","authors":"Durant Frantzen","doi":"10.1177/08862605251365654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk assessments performed in the context of community supervision provide a unique opportunity to identify characteristics associated with high-risk domestic violence (DV) offenders. To date, however, few studies have used such data to explore the factors that differentiate offenders who have engaged in nonfatal strangulation (NFS) to other less severe forms of DV. Using data from the Wisconsin Risk Need assessment, the present study compares risk and need factors for offenders sentenced to probation for an offense involving NFS to a misdemeanor DV offense (n = 909). Results from logistic regression models showed that NFS offenders were more likely to have chronic alcohol problems as well as higher rates of marital, family, and emotional instability compared to misdemeanor DV offenders. Further, NFS offenders were less likely to have a history of probation revocations. These results may assist probation officers with the identification of characteristics that are more closely associated with the offender's tendency to use strangulation. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of additional risk assessment tools used with offenders who have engaged in NFS as part of DV.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"37 1","pages":"8862605251365654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251365654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Risk assessments performed in the context of community supervision provide a unique opportunity to identify characteristics associated with high-risk domestic violence (DV) offenders. To date, however, few studies have used such data to explore the factors that differentiate offenders who have engaged in nonfatal strangulation (NFS) to other less severe forms of DV. Using data from the Wisconsin Risk Need assessment, the present study compares risk and need factors for offenders sentenced to probation for an offense involving NFS to a misdemeanor DV offense (n = 909). Results from logistic regression models showed that NFS offenders were more likely to have chronic alcohol problems as well as higher rates of marital, family, and emotional instability compared to misdemeanor DV offenders. Further, NFS offenders were less likely to have a history of probation revocations. These results may assist probation officers with the identification of characteristics that are more closely associated with the offender's tendency to use strangulation. Further research is needed to explore the efficacy of additional risk assessment tools used with offenders who have engaged in NFS as part of DV.
利用罪犯风险评估数据探讨社区监管背景下的非致命绞杀。
在社区监督的背景下进行的风险评估提供了一个独特的机会,以确定高风险家庭暴力(DV)罪犯的相关特征。然而,到目前为止,很少有研究使用这些数据来探索区分非致命绞杀(NFS)和其他不那么严重的家庭暴力形式的罪犯的因素。使用威斯康辛风险需求评估的数据,本研究比较了因NFS犯罪被判缓刑的罪犯和因轻罪家暴犯罪被判缓刑的罪犯的风险和需求因素(n = 909)。逻辑回归模型的结果显示,与家庭暴力罪犯相比,家庭暴力罪犯更有可能有慢性酒精问题,以及更高的婚姻、家庭和情绪不稳定率。此外,NFS违法者不太可能有缓刑撤销的历史。这些结果可能有助于缓刑官员识别与罪犯使用勒死倾向更密切相关的特征。需要进一步的研究来探索额外的风险评估工具的有效性,这些工具用于从事NFS作为DV的一部分的罪犯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信