Genomic prediction and genome-wide association study for liver abscesses in crossbred beef cattle.

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
H L Bradford,L A Kuehn,W M Snelling,B N Keel,S A Jones,R M Thallman,A K Lindholm-Perry
{"title":"Genomic prediction and genome-wide association study for liver abscesses in crossbred beef cattle.","authors":"H L Bradford,L A Kuehn,W M Snelling,B N Keel,S A Jones,R M Thallman,A K Lindholm-Perry","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liver abscesses are a concern in feedlot cattle, and little is known about the role of genetics in their development. This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters and to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with liver abscesses. Crossbred cattle representing 18 breeds in the United States Meat Animal Research Center Germplasm Evaluation Program were phenotyped for liver abscesses at slaughter (n = 9,044). Seventeen percent of cattle had liver abscesses. These cattle had genotypes that were imputed to sequence variant genotypes. After filtering and quality control, 340,723 SNP were used in the analysis. Liver abscess prevalence was modeled with a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) threshold model using a Bayesian framework. The model included contemporary group (sex, treatment group, and slaughter date), additive genomic, and residual effects. Genomic heritability was 0.039 (95% highest posterior density = 0.005, 0.081), which was very small. To assess prediction quality, a 5-fold random cross-validation structure was used. Method Linear Regression was used to assess accuracy, bias, and dispersion by comparing estimated breeding values (EBV) from full and reduced analyses. Cross-validation metrics showed EBV based on genotypes had 0.05 reliability (SD < 0.01) with no bias relative to EBV based on genotypes and phenotypes. For the genome-wide association study, SNP effects were back calculated from the EBV solutions from ssGBLUP. No SNP were associated with liver abscesses at a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted 0.05 significance level. Although a large dataset was used, this result was because of the low genomic heritability and imprecise EBV used to calculate SNP effects. Based on these results, environmental factors contribute to most of the variation in liver abscesses. Genetic selection to reduce liver abscesses would be slow because of the low genomic heritability, measurement late in life, and inability to measure breeding animals. A faster approach would be finding additional environmental interventions that maintain animal performance.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Liver abscesses are a concern in feedlot cattle, and little is known about the role of genetics in their development. This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters and to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) associated with liver abscesses. Crossbred cattle representing 18 breeds in the United States Meat Animal Research Center Germplasm Evaluation Program were phenotyped for liver abscesses at slaughter (n = 9,044). Seventeen percent of cattle had liver abscesses. These cattle had genotypes that were imputed to sequence variant genotypes. After filtering and quality control, 340,723 SNP were used in the analysis. Liver abscess prevalence was modeled with a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) threshold model using a Bayesian framework. The model included contemporary group (sex, treatment group, and slaughter date), additive genomic, and residual effects. Genomic heritability was 0.039 (95% highest posterior density = 0.005, 0.081), which was very small. To assess prediction quality, a 5-fold random cross-validation structure was used. Method Linear Regression was used to assess accuracy, bias, and dispersion by comparing estimated breeding values (EBV) from full and reduced analyses. Cross-validation metrics showed EBV based on genotypes had 0.05 reliability (SD < 0.01) with no bias relative to EBV based on genotypes and phenotypes. For the genome-wide association study, SNP effects were back calculated from the EBV solutions from ssGBLUP. No SNP were associated with liver abscesses at a Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted 0.05 significance level. Although a large dataset was used, this result was because of the low genomic heritability and imprecise EBV used to calculate SNP effects. Based on these results, environmental factors contribute to most of the variation in liver abscesses. Genetic selection to reduce liver abscesses would be slow because of the low genomic heritability, measurement late in life, and inability to measure breeding animals. A faster approach would be finding additional environmental interventions that maintain animal performance.
杂交肉牛肝脓肿的基因组预测及全基因组关联研究。
肝脓肿是饲养场牛的一个问题,很少有人知道遗传在其发展中的作用。本研究旨在估计遗传参数并鉴定与肝脓肿相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。在美国肉类动物研究中心种质评估项目中,代表18个品种的杂交牛在屠宰时表现为肝脓肿(n = 9044)。17%的牛患有肝脓肿。这些牛的基因型被输入到变异基因型序列中。经过筛选和质量控制,共有340,723个SNP用于分析。肝脓肿患病率采用贝叶斯框架单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测(ssGBLUP)阈值模型建模。该模型包括当代组(性别、治疗组和屠宰日期)、加性基因组和残留效应。基因组遗传率为0.039(95%最高后验密度= 0.005,0.081),遗传率很小。为了评估预测质量,采用了5倍随机交叉验证结构。方法采用线性回归方法,通过比较完整分析和简化分析的估计育种值(EBV)来评估准确性、偏倚和分散性。交叉验证指标显示,基于基因型的EBV可靠性为0.05 (SD < 0.01),相对于基于基因型和表型的EBV没有偏倚。对于全基因组关联研究,从ssGBLUP的EBV溶液中回溯计算SNP效应。在benjamin - hochberg校正0.05显著水平上,没有SNP与肝脓肿相关。虽然使用了一个大的数据集,但这一结果是由于基因组遗传力低和用于计算SNP效应的EBV不精确。基于这些结果,环境因素导致了肝脓肿的大部分变异。减少肝脓肿的遗传选择将是缓慢的,因为基因组遗传性低,测量在生命后期,无法测量繁殖动物。一种更快的方法是找到额外的环境干预措施来维持动物的生产性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信