Identifying the Relationships Among Ecosystem Services and Their Influencing Pathways in the Jialing River Basin: An Integrated Social‐Ecological Perspective

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yixu Wang, Jie Gong
{"title":"Identifying the Relationships Among Ecosystem Services and Their Influencing Pathways in the Jialing River Basin: An Integrated Social‐Ecological Perspective","authors":"Yixu Wang, Jie Gong","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploring the interactive relationships and driving mechanisms of ecosystem services (ESs) is crucial for addressing urgent land use conflicts and related ecological and environmental challenges. Currently, the cross‐scale complex relationships between ESs, along with the intermediate mechanisms and processes that influence ESs, merit further research. This study explored the relationships among typical ESs at the county and small watershed scales. Subsequently, the conceptual framework of the social‐ecological system (SES) was introduced, and the partial least squares‐structural equation model (PLS‐SEM) was employed to comprehensively depict the influence pathways of each potential factor on ESs. Taking the Jialing River Basin (JRB) in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as a typical study area, the results indicated that during the research period, the direction of the ESs relationships remained consistent at the dual scales, yet the intensities varied. There was a synergistic relationship between water yield (WY) and food production (FP), whereas the relationship between WY and soil conservation (SC), and between SC and FP, shifted from trade‐offs to synergies. Path analysis confirmed that potential factors collectively influence ESs through direct and indirect pathways, with landscape pattern acting as a mediating variable. In addition, the influence pathways at the small watershed scale were more intricate. In summary, this study highlights the need for decision‐makers to consider scale effects and the indirect effects of influencing factors when managing ESs, and offers reference information for guiding cross‐scale sustainable development in the JRB.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exploring the interactive relationships and driving mechanisms of ecosystem services (ESs) is crucial for addressing urgent land use conflicts and related ecological and environmental challenges. Currently, the cross‐scale complex relationships between ESs, along with the intermediate mechanisms and processes that influence ESs, merit further research. This study explored the relationships among typical ESs at the county and small watershed scales. Subsequently, the conceptual framework of the social‐ecological system (SES) was introduced, and the partial least squares‐structural equation model (PLS‐SEM) was employed to comprehensively depict the influence pathways of each potential factor on ESs. Taking the Jialing River Basin (JRB) in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as a typical study area, the results indicated that during the research period, the direction of the ESs relationships remained consistent at the dual scales, yet the intensities varied. There was a synergistic relationship between water yield (WY) and food production (FP), whereas the relationship between WY and soil conservation (SC), and between SC and FP, shifted from trade‐offs to synergies. Path analysis confirmed that potential factors collectively influence ESs through direct and indirect pathways, with landscape pattern acting as a mediating variable. In addition, the influence pathways at the small watershed scale were more intricate. In summary, this study highlights the need for decision‐makers to consider scale effects and the indirect effects of influencing factors when managing ESs, and offers reference information for guiding cross‐scale sustainable development in the JRB.
基于社会生态综合视角的嘉陵江流域生态系统服务功能关系及其影响途径研究
探索生态系统服务的互动关系和驱动机制对于解决紧迫的土地利用冲突和相关的生态环境挑战至关重要。目前,ESs之间的跨尺度复杂关系,以及影响ESs的中间机制和过程,值得进一步研究。本研究探讨了县域尺度和小流域尺度典型生态环境的关系。随后,引入了社会生态系统(SES)的概念框架,并采用偏最小二乘-结构方程模型(PLS - SEM)综合描述了各潜在因素对社会生态系统的影响途径。以长江上游嘉陵江流域为典型研究区,结果表明:研究期间,在双尺度上,ESs关系的方向保持一致,但强度有所变化。水分产量(WY)与粮食产量(FP)之间存在协同关系,而水分产量(WY)与土壤保持(SC)之间以及土壤保持与FP之间的关系则从权衡关系转向协同关系。通径分析证实,潜在因子通过直接和间接途径共同影响生态环境,景观格局是其中的中介变量。此外,小流域尺度的影响路径更为复杂。综上所述,本研究强调了决策者在管理中小企业时需要考虑规模效应和影响因素的间接效应,并为指导中小企业跨尺度的可持续发展提供了参考信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信