Imperial Policies and Well‐Being in the Prehistoric Andes

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Donna J. Nash
{"title":"Imperial Policies and Well‐Being in the Prehistoric Andes","authors":"Donna J. Nash","doi":"10.1002/sea2.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At European contact, the Inca dominated the Andes. Some colonial commentators described them as benevolent because of their policies to prevent starvation among cooperative subjects; however, this does not mean that there were no ill effects to the well‐being of conquered groups. Archaeological research focused on well‐being offers new avenues through which to understand the impacts of expansive polities on subject populations. In this article, I propose some ways that archaeologists may assess well‐being in prehistoric societies using relative measures of poverty and social exclusion to establish expectations. This approach is applied to the Inca and Wari Empires and uses archaeological data from human remains, landscapes, and households. Current evidence cannot dispute claims regarding Inca policies that prevented the starvation of subjects but indicates that some people physically suffered due to increased labor demands. Other groups experienced forms of social exclusion and perhaps felt terrorized by the destruction of ancestral remains and the co‐option of sacred sites. The Wari Empire probably pioneered these tactics. Archaeologists, in addition to examining health, can examine the material indicators of imperial policies and consider how a group's cosmology might be used as a means to exert political control when assessing the well‐being of populations in the past.","PeriodicalId":45372,"journal":{"name":"Economic Anthropology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sea2.70016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At European contact, the Inca dominated the Andes. Some colonial commentators described them as benevolent because of their policies to prevent starvation among cooperative subjects; however, this does not mean that there were no ill effects to the well‐being of conquered groups. Archaeological research focused on well‐being offers new avenues through which to understand the impacts of expansive polities on subject populations. In this article, I propose some ways that archaeologists may assess well‐being in prehistoric societies using relative measures of poverty and social exclusion to establish expectations. This approach is applied to the Inca and Wari Empires and uses archaeological data from human remains, landscapes, and households. Current evidence cannot dispute claims regarding Inca policies that prevented the starvation of subjects but indicates that some people physically suffered due to increased labor demands. Other groups experienced forms of social exclusion and perhaps felt terrorized by the destruction of ancestral remains and the co‐option of sacred sites. The Wari Empire probably pioneered these tactics. Archaeologists, in addition to examining health, can examine the material indicators of imperial policies and consider how a group's cosmology might be used as a means to exert political control when assessing the well‐being of populations in the past.
史前安第斯山脉的帝国政策与福祉
与欧洲人接触后,印加人统治了安第斯山脉。一些殖民评论员称他们是仁慈的,因为他们的政策防止了合作臣民的饥饿;然而,这并不意味着对被征服群体的福祉没有不良影响。关注福祉的考古研究为理解扩张政策对主体人群的影响提供了新的途径。在这篇文章中,我提出了一些方法,考古学家可以使用贫困和社会排斥的相对措施来评估史前社会的福祉,以建立期望。这种方法应用于印加和瓦里帝国,并使用来自人类遗骸、景观和家庭的考古数据。目前的证据无法反驳关于印加政策的说法,这些政策防止了臣民的饥饿,但表明一些人由于劳动需求的增加而遭受了身体上的痛苦。其他群体经历了各种形式的社会排斥,可能对祖先遗迹的破坏和圣地的共同选择感到恐惧。瓦里帝国可能是这些战术的先驱。考古学家除了研究健康之外,还可以研究帝国政策的物质指标,并考虑在评估过去人口的福祉时,一个群体的宇宙观如何被用作施加政治控制的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Anthropology
Economic Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信