Facilitated Versus Self-Directed Educational Modalities in Palliative Care Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the CAPACITI Intervention.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2025.0010
Midori Matthew, Daryl Bainbridge, Jeff Myers, Oren Levine, Leah Steinberg, Nadia Incardona, Samantha Winemaker, Kathy Kortes-Miller, Kelli Stajduhar, Frances Kilbertus, Jose Pereira, Hsien Seow
{"title":"Facilitated Versus Self-Directed Educational Modalities in Palliative Care Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the CAPACITI Intervention.","authors":"Midori Matthew, Daryl Bainbridge, Jeff Myers, Oren Levine, Leah Steinberg, Nadia Incardona, Samantha Winemaker, Kathy Kortes-Miller, Kelli Stajduhar, Frances Kilbertus, Jose Pereira, Hsien Seow","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2025.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community Access to Palliative Care via Interprofessional Teams Improvement (CAPACITI) is a virtual educational program designed to support primary care providers in delivering a palliative approach to care. This study evaluated whether expert-facilitated sessions result in greater self-rated competency than a self-directed format across three CAPACITI modules: Identification and Assessment, Communication, and Ongoing Management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized controlled trial where 566 interprofessional primary care team members were randomized to facilitated or self-directed delivery of the CAPACITI program. Participants completed two validated surveys at baseline and after each module: the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey and the CAPACITI Competencies survey. These assessed self-rated comfort and competency in providing palliative care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 566 participants randomized, 378 completed Module 1, and 270 and 192 completed Modules 2 and 3, respectively. Participants in both study arms demonstrated significant improvements in self-assessed comfort and competency following each module. No significant differences were observed between the facilitated and self-directed groups across either survey instrument.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants in both the facilitated and self-directed study arms reported significant increases in self-rated comfort and competency in providing a palliative approach to care. CAPACITI demonstrates that a relatively large, intensive, and feasible training program can be implemented virtually across diverse care settings. These results support the broader application of structured, scalable educational interventions in primary care, particularly those grounded in practical content and adult learning principles.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05120154. Date registered: Oct 15, 2021. The authors affirm that this trial was registered prior to enrolling any participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"365-373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2025.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community Access to Palliative Care via Interprofessional Teams Improvement (CAPACITI) is a virtual educational program designed to support primary care providers in delivering a palliative approach to care. This study evaluated whether expert-facilitated sessions result in greater self-rated competency than a self-directed format across three CAPACITI modules: Identification and Assessment, Communication, and Ongoing Management.

Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial where 566 interprofessional primary care team members were randomized to facilitated or self-directed delivery of the CAPACITI program. Participants completed two validated surveys at baseline and after each module: the End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey and the CAPACITI Competencies survey. These assessed self-rated comfort and competency in providing palliative care.

Results: Of the 566 participants randomized, 378 completed Module 1, and 270 and 192 completed Modules 2 and 3, respectively. Participants in both study arms demonstrated significant improvements in self-assessed comfort and competency following each module. No significant differences were observed between the facilitated and self-directed groups across either survey instrument.

Conclusion: Participants in both the facilitated and self-directed study arms reported significant increases in self-rated comfort and competency in providing a palliative approach to care. CAPACITI demonstrates that a relatively large, intensive, and feasible training program can be implemented virtually across diverse care settings. These results support the broader application of structured, scalable educational interventions in primary care, particularly those grounded in practical content and adult learning principles.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05120154. Date registered: Oct 15, 2021. The authors affirm that this trial was registered prior to enrolling any participants.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

姑息治疗培训中便利与自我指导的教育模式:一项CAPACITI干预的随机对照试验。
背景:通过跨专业团队改善社区获得姑息治疗(CAPACITI)是一个虚拟教育项目,旨在支持初级保健提供者提供姑息治疗方法。本研究评估了在三个CAPACITI模块(识别与评估、沟通和持续管理)中,专家促进的会议是否比自我指导的形式产生更大的自我评价能力。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验,566名跨专业初级保健团队成员被随机分配到辅助或自我指导的CAPACITI项目中。参与者在基线和每个模块之后完成了两项有效的调查:临终专业护理者调查和CAPACITI能力调查。这些评估自评舒适和能力提供姑息治疗。结果:在随机分配的566名参与者中,378人完成了模块1,270人和192人分别完成了模块2和3。在每个模块之后,两个研究组的参与者在自我评估的舒适度和能力方面都有了显著的改善。在两种调查工具中,没有观察到促进组和自我指导组之间的显着差异。结论:促进和自我导向研究组的参与者都报告了提供姑息治疗方法的自我评价舒适度和能力显著增加。CAPACITI表明,一个相对较大的、密集的、可行的培训计划可以在不同的护理环境中实施。这些结果支持在初级保健中更广泛地应用结构化、可扩展的教育干预措施,特别是那些基于实践内容和成人学习原则的干预措施。试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05120154。报名日期:2021年10月15日。作者确认,该试验在招募任何参与者之前进行了登记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书