Reliability of Concussion Signs and Symptoms Reporting Among Former Professional American-Style Football Players.

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/08977151251362274
Niki A Konstantinides, Rachel Grashow, Heather DiGregorio, Elizabeth Nolan, Frank E Speizer, Aaron L Baggish, Ross D Zafonte, Marc G Weisskopf
{"title":"Reliability of Concussion Signs and Symptoms Reporting Among Former Professional American-Style Football Players.","authors":"Niki A Konstantinides, Rachel Grashow, Heather DiGregorio, Elizabeth Nolan, Frank E Speizer, Aaron L Baggish, Ross D Zafonte, Marc G Weisskopf","doi":"10.1177/08977151251362274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retrospective evaluations of repeated head injury are needed to better understand associations between head injury exposure and later-life deleterious outcomes. However, there is limited assessment of whether head injury recall assessments produce consistent measures over time, and no assessment of whether the reporting is related to current health status. The concussion signs and symptoms scale (CSS; developed for the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University) was designed to measure cumulative head injury exposure history by asking about the frequency of 10 CSS during active football play. Responses are summed with a total CSS range of 0-130. Former professional American-style football players completed the CSS at two timepoints. A subset of participants also reported on current health (subjective cognitive symptoms [Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire], anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder], pain [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global], and overall health [PROMIS Global]) at each timepoint. To examine reporting consistency and recall bias, we calculated the Spearman correlation between measures assessed an average of 74.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 41.2) months apart and estimated associations between change in demographic, football-related, and current health factors and change in CSS (ΔCSS) over time using multivariable linear regression. Across the 335 participants, the mean (SD) CSS score at times 1 and 2 were 30.2 (25.5) and 29.1 (25.2), respectively, with an average change in CSS (ΔCSS) of -1.1 (SD = 19.8). There was no significant association between ΔCSS and years since play, months between timepoints, or age at time 1 (0.49 < <i>p</i> < 0.84). Eighty-one (24.2%) participants completed identical questions on current health factors at times 1 and 2. In separate multivariable models, there was no association between changes in pain, cognitive symptoms, health, depression, and anxiety reporting and ΔCSS (0.17 < <i>p</i> < 0.92). On average, the CSS score as a measure of retrospective concussion exposure did not change meaningfully over an average of 75 months, and changes in current health status were not significantly associated with ΔCSS. Results suggest that the CSS scale is stable over time and appears robust against changes in health status. The CSS should be considered for other retrospective studies of brain-injured populations to measure prior cumulative concussion history.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"578-585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251362274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective evaluations of repeated head injury are needed to better understand associations between head injury exposure and later-life deleterious outcomes. However, there is limited assessment of whether head injury recall assessments produce consistent measures over time, and no assessment of whether the reporting is related to current health status. The concussion signs and symptoms scale (CSS; developed for the Football Players Health Study at Harvard University) was designed to measure cumulative head injury exposure history by asking about the frequency of 10 CSS during active football play. Responses are summed with a total CSS range of 0-130. Former professional American-style football players completed the CSS at two timepoints. A subset of participants also reported on current health (subjective cognitive symptoms [Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders], depression [Patient Health Questionnaire], anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder], pain [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global], and overall health [PROMIS Global]) at each timepoint. To examine reporting consistency and recall bias, we calculated the Spearman correlation between measures assessed an average of 74.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 41.2) months apart and estimated associations between change in demographic, football-related, and current health factors and change in CSS (ΔCSS) over time using multivariable linear regression. Across the 335 participants, the mean (SD) CSS score at times 1 and 2 were 30.2 (25.5) and 29.1 (25.2), respectively, with an average change in CSS (ΔCSS) of -1.1 (SD = 19.8). There was no significant association between ΔCSS and years since play, months between timepoints, or age at time 1 (0.49 < p < 0.84). Eighty-one (24.2%) participants completed identical questions on current health factors at times 1 and 2. In separate multivariable models, there was no association between changes in pain, cognitive symptoms, health, depression, and anxiety reporting and ΔCSS (0.17 < p < 0.92). On average, the CSS score as a measure of retrospective concussion exposure did not change meaningfully over an average of 75 months, and changes in current health status were not significantly associated with ΔCSS. Results suggest that the CSS scale is stable over time and appears robust against changes in health status. The CSS should be considered for other retrospective studies of brain-injured populations to measure prior cumulative concussion history.

Abstract Image

前美式足球运动员脑震荡体征和症状报告的可靠性
需要对反复头部损伤进行回顾性评估,以更好地了解头部损伤暴露与晚年有害结果之间的关系。然而,对头部损伤召回评估能否产生长期一致的衡量标准的评估有限,也没有评估报告是否与目前的健康状况有关。脑震荡体征和症状量表(CSS;为哈佛大学足球运动员健康研究开发)旨在通过询问活跃足球比赛中10个CSS的频率来测量累积的头部损伤暴露史。对响应进行求和,CSS的总范围为0-130。前职业美式足球运动员在两个时间点完成了CSS。一部分参与者还报告了每个时间点的当前健康状况(主观认知症状[神经系统疾病的生活质量]、抑郁[患者健康问卷]、焦虑[广泛性焦虑障碍]、疼痛[患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS) Global]和总体健康状况[PROMIS Global])。为了检验报告的一致性和回忆偏差,我们计算了平均间隔74.5个月(标准差[SD] = 41.2)的测量之间的Spearman相关性,并使用多变量线性回归估计了人口统计学、足球相关和当前健康因素的变化与CSS (ΔCSS)随时间变化之间的关联。在335名参与者中,第1次和第2次的平均(SD) CSS评分分别为30.2(25.5)和29.1 (25.2),CSS (ΔCSS)的平均变化为-1.1 (SD = 19.8)。ΔCSS与游戏时间、时间点之间的月数或时间1的年龄之间无显著相关性(0.49 < p < 0.84)。81名(24.2%)参与者在第1次和第2次完成了关于当前健康因素的相同问题。在单独的多变量模型中,疼痛、认知症状、健康、抑郁和焦虑报告与ΔCSS的变化之间没有关联(0.17 < p < 0.92)。平均而言,CSS评分作为回顾性脑震荡暴露的衡量标准,在平均75个月内没有显著变化,当前健康状况的变化与ΔCSS没有显著相关。结果表明,随着时间的推移,CSS量表是稳定的,并且对健康状态的变化表现出稳健。在其他脑损伤人群的回顾性研究中,应考虑使用CSS来测量先前的累积脑震荡史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信