Communicating to the Intellect, Heart, and Person: A Model Describing Participants' Experience of Goals of Care Discussions Conducted During Acute Inpatient Care.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2025-06-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2025.0020
Joshua S Lee, Katrielle Joy X Y Fu, Lynn Wiryasaputra, Celestine Z Q Lim, Paul Victor Patinadan, Joseph Y J Ong, Andy H Y Ho, Tricia S H Yung
{"title":"Communicating to the Intellect, Heart, and Person: A Model Describing Participants' Experience of Goals of Care Discussions Conducted During Acute Inpatient Care.","authors":"Joshua S Lee, Katrielle Joy X Y Fu, Lynn Wiryasaputra, Celestine Z Q Lim, Paul Victor Patinadan, Joseph Y J Ong, Andy H Y Ho, Tricia S H Yung","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2025.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Goals of care (GOC) discussions align medical care with patients' wishes. Many physician-associated barriers to GOC discussions have been identified, but there is little understanding of the lived experiences of patients and their nominated health care spokespersons (NHSs) who have participated in the discussion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the lived experience of participants of GOC discussions conducted during acute inpatient care and identify the features of well-conducted GOC discussions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative enquiry based on grounded theory, employing a social-constructivist approach and interpretivist research paradigm. Participants were purposively sampled from the medical oncology, geriatric, and palliative medicine departments of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Data was gathered using semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 interviews (16 NHS, 8 patients) were conducted. All participants were patients or NHS of patients who lived with a life-limiting illness (15 Cancer, 9 Non-cancer). The analysis yielded 2 major themes-<i>Preconceived health perceptions</i> and <i>Desired communications skills</i>-and 6 subthemes-<i>Elusive knowledge</i>, <i>Emotional undertones</i>, <i>Existential struggles</i>, <i>Explicit clarity</i>, <i>Embracing empathy,</i> and <i>Enhancing autonomy</i>. Well-conducted GOC discussions occurred when the participants' health perceptions were satisfied by a complementary communication skill employed by the physician, based on the model \"Communicating to the <i>Intellect</i>, <i>Heart,</i> and <i>Person</i>.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Well-conducted GOC discussions that facilitated consensus were discussions where the physician engaged the participant at three levels-the <i>Intellect, Heart,</i> and <i>Person</i>. Our model advocates for person-centered conversations where the views of the participant are heard and will provide insights to improve the conduct of GOC discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"356-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2025.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Goals of care (GOC) discussions align medical care with patients' wishes. Many physician-associated barriers to GOC discussions have been identified, but there is little understanding of the lived experiences of patients and their nominated health care spokespersons (NHSs) who have participated in the discussion.

Objectives: We aimed to describe the lived experience of participants of GOC discussions conducted during acute inpatient care and identify the features of well-conducted GOC discussions.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative enquiry based on grounded theory, employing a social-constructivist approach and interpretivist research paradigm. Participants were purposively sampled from the medical oncology, geriatric, and palliative medicine departments of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Data was gathered using semi-structured interviews.

Results: A total of 24 interviews (16 NHS, 8 patients) were conducted. All participants were patients or NHS of patients who lived with a life-limiting illness (15 Cancer, 9 Non-cancer). The analysis yielded 2 major themes-Preconceived health perceptions and Desired communications skills-and 6 subthemes-Elusive knowledge, Emotional undertones, Existential struggles, Explicit clarity, Embracing empathy, and Enhancing autonomy. Well-conducted GOC discussions occurred when the participants' health perceptions were satisfied by a complementary communication skill employed by the physician, based on the model "Communicating to the Intellect, Heart, and Person."

Conclusions: Well-conducted GOC discussions that facilitated consensus were discussions where the physician engaged the participant at three levels-the Intellect, Heart, and Person. Our model advocates for person-centered conversations where the views of the participant are heard and will provide insights to improve the conduct of GOC discussions.

Abstract Image

与智力、心灵和人沟通:一个描述参与者在急性住院治疗期间进行的护理目标讨论经验的模型。
背景:护理目标(GOC)讨论将医疗护理与患者的愿望结合起来。已经确定了许多与医生相关的GOC讨论障碍,但对参与讨论的患者及其指定的卫生保健发言人(NHSs)的生活经历知之甚少。目的:我们旨在描述急性住院治疗期间进行GOC讨论的参与者的生活经验,并确定进行良好的GOC讨论的特征。方法:采用社会建构主义研究方法和解释主义研究范式,在扎根理论的基础上进行定性研究。参与者有目的地从新加坡一家三级医院的肿瘤内科、老年医学和姑息医学部门取样。数据是通过半结构化访谈收集的。结果:共访谈24次(16名NHS, 8名患者)。所有参与者都是患有限制生命的疾病的患者或NHS患者(15名癌症患者,9名非癌症患者)。该分析产生了两个主要主题——先入为主的健康观念和期望的沟通技巧,以及六个次要主题——难以捉摸的知识、情感基调、存在的斗争、明确的清晰度、拥抱同理心和增强自主性。当参与者的健康感知被医生采用的互补沟通技巧所满足时,良好的GOC讨论就会发生,这种沟通技巧基于“与智力、心灵和人沟通”的模式。结论:良好的GOC讨论促进了共识,在讨论中,医生与参与者在三个层面——智力、心和人——进行了接触。我们的模式提倡以人为中心的对话,在这种对话中,参与者的观点得到倾听,并将为改善GOC讨论的进行提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书