An Educational Initiative Describing Clinician Teachers' Experiences Following Serious Illness Communication Skills Faculty Development Training.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2024.0073
Helen James, Jacquelin Forsey, Kyle Albuquerque-Boutilier, Jillian Gustin, Warren Harris Lewin
{"title":"An Educational Initiative Describing Clinician Teachers' Experiences Following Serious Illness Communication Skills Faculty Development Training.","authors":"Helen James, Jacquelin Forsey, Kyle Albuquerque-Boutilier, Jillian Gustin, Warren Harris Lewin","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2024.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serious illness communication skills (SICS) are essential competencies for clinicians to possess. Unfortunately, SICS teaching is not routinely taught and many clinician teachers (CTs) never received training on how to teach them. We funded two cohorts of CTs to learn an evidence-based approach to SICS teaching to scale a unified approach to such training.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to explore CT experiences and attitudes toward SICS teaching following completion of VitalTalk Faculty Development training. Our secondary aim was to identify perceived barriers and enablers experienced by CTs in the translation of newly acquired skills into the workplace.</p><p><strong>Design/measurements: </strong>Survey and semi-structured interviews administered post-training.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large metropolitan academic hospital in Canada. Fifteen (83%) of CTs completed the survey and 6 (40%) were interviewed. Participants were 38 years old (avg), female (80%), physicians (87%), nurse practitioners (13%), and in practice 8 years (avg).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-hundred percent of participants would recommend the course to colleagues, believing it increased their SICS teaching quality and comfort to teach this topic in varied settings. Post-training, 90% of cohort 1 and 0% of cohort 2 taught SICS in workshops. Seventy percent of cohort 1 and 60% of cohort 2 taught SICS at the bedside across 10 specialties and interdisciplinary groups. Top cited teaching enablers were funding, protected time, and administrative support. All participants reported being likely to teach a workshop within the year. Eighty percent reported training increased their comfort to lead such conversations and 67% reported more frequently engaging in them. Qualitative analysis revealed that successful implementation requires SICS teaching to be valued at every level of the institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investing in faculty development for a group of CTs led to increased confidence in teaching about and having serious illness conversations and informed needs for a local community-of-practice primed to rapidly scale SICS teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"291-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serious illness communication skills (SICS) are essential competencies for clinicians to possess. Unfortunately, SICS teaching is not routinely taught and many clinician teachers (CTs) never received training on how to teach them. We funded two cohorts of CTs to learn an evidence-based approach to SICS teaching to scale a unified approach to such training.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to explore CT experiences and attitudes toward SICS teaching following completion of VitalTalk Faculty Development training. Our secondary aim was to identify perceived barriers and enablers experienced by CTs in the translation of newly acquired skills into the workplace.

Design/measurements: Survey and semi-structured interviews administered post-training.

Setting: Large metropolitan academic hospital in Canada. Fifteen (83%) of CTs completed the survey and 6 (40%) were interviewed. Participants were 38 years old (avg), female (80%), physicians (87%), nurse practitioners (13%), and in practice 8 years (avg).

Results: One-hundred percent of participants would recommend the course to colleagues, believing it increased their SICS teaching quality and comfort to teach this topic in varied settings. Post-training, 90% of cohort 1 and 0% of cohort 2 taught SICS in workshops. Seventy percent of cohort 1 and 60% of cohort 2 taught SICS at the bedside across 10 specialties and interdisciplinary groups. Top cited teaching enablers were funding, protected time, and administrative support. All participants reported being likely to teach a workshop within the year. Eighty percent reported training increased their comfort to lead such conversations and 67% reported more frequently engaging in them. Qualitative analysis revealed that successful implementation requires SICS teaching to be valued at every level of the institution.

Conclusion: Investing in faculty development for a group of CTs led to increased confidence in teaching about and having serious illness conversations and informed needs for a local community-of-practice primed to rapidly scale SICS teaching.

Abstract Image

描述临床医生教师在大病沟通技巧教师发展培训后经验的教育倡议。
背景:严重疾病沟通技巧(SICS)是临床医生必须具备的基本能力。不幸的是,SICS教学并不是常规教学,许多临床医生教师(CTs)从未接受过如何教学的培训。我们资助了两组ct学习以证据为基础的SICS教学方法,以扩展这类培训的统一方法。目的:本研究的主要目的是探讨完成VitalTalk教师发展培训后的CT经验和对SICS教学的态度。我们的第二个目标是确定在将新获得的技能转化为工作场所时,ct所经历的感知障碍和推动因素。设计/测量:培训后进行的调查和半结构化访谈。环境:加拿大大型大都市学术医院。15名(83%)ct完成了调查,6名(40%)ct接受了访谈。参与者年龄38岁(平均年龄),女性(80%),医生(87%),执业护士(13%),执业8年(平均年龄)。结果:100%的参与者会向同事推荐这门课程,他们相信在不同的环境中教授这一主题可以提高他们的物理物理教学质量和舒适度。培训结束后,90%的队列1和0%的队列2在研讨会上教授SICS。70%的队列1和60%的队列2在10个专业和跨学科小组的床边教授SICS。被引用最多的教学促进因素是资金、保护时间和行政支持。所有的参与者都报告说,他们很可能在一年内教授一个讲习班。80%的人表示,训练让他们更能自如地进行此类对话,67%的人表示更频繁地进行此类对话。定性分析表明,成功的实施需要在机构的每个层面都重视SICS教学。结论:投资于一组ct的教师发展,增加了对教学的信心,并进行了严重疾病的对话,并为当地社区的实践需求做好了准备,以迅速扩大SICS教学规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书