Liat Lipski-Pozitzki, Anne Marie Novak, Rachel Heffez Ayzenfeld, Yair Levy, Danny Alon, Michael Lishner, Shahar Lev-Ari
{"title":"Impact of Daily Personal Communication on Hospital Readmissions: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Liat Lipski-Pozitzki, Anne Marie Novak, Rachel Heffez Ayzenfeld, Yair Levy, Danny Alon, Michael Lishner, Shahar Lev-Ari","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.08.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent hospitalizations present significant financial burdens and health risks. Poor communication and lack of personalized care are major contributors to preventable readmissions. This study examined whether brief, personal conversations between physicians and hospitalized -patients could reduce 1-week and 30-days post-discharge readmissions, and improve satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, case-control study involved 459 patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine Wards at a general hospital in Israel. Patients 18-100 years were included, excluding those with dementia, limited communication abilities, or discharge within 24-hours. The intervention group engaged in brief, personal conversations with physicians. Comparison group patients were hospitalized concurrently in other wards and received standard care. Eleven physicians received 1.5-hours of training, and conducted 3-5 minute personal conversations with patients daily, supplementing standard care. Readmissions within 7- and 30-days post-discharge and patient satisfaction were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention (n=249) and comparison groups (n=210) had similar baseline characteristics except that the intervention group was older (66.7 vs. 62.7 years, p=.008). Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly reduced odds of readmission in the intervention group at both 1 week (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66, p = .002) and 30 days (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.88, p = .012), after adjusting for covariates including age, diagnosis severity, satisfaction, and sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Readmission rates were decreased after brief, personal physician-patient conversations. These findings support integrating personalized communication strategies into standard care to improve outcomes. Future research should confirm these finding in larger samples and explore optimal frequency and duration of such interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.08.021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recurrent hospitalizations present significant financial burdens and health risks. Poor communication and lack of personalized care are major contributors to preventable readmissions. This study examined whether brief, personal conversations between physicians and hospitalized -patients could reduce 1-week and 30-days post-discharge readmissions, and improve satisfaction.
Methods: This prospective, case-control study involved 459 patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine Wards at a general hospital in Israel. Patients 18-100 years were included, excluding those with dementia, limited communication abilities, or discharge within 24-hours. The intervention group engaged in brief, personal conversations with physicians. Comparison group patients were hospitalized concurrently in other wards and received standard care. Eleven physicians received 1.5-hours of training, and conducted 3-5 minute personal conversations with patients daily, supplementing standard care. Readmissions within 7- and 30-days post-discharge and patient satisfaction were measured.
Results: The intervention (n=249) and comparison groups (n=210) had similar baseline characteristics except that the intervention group was older (66.7 vs. 62.7 years, p=.008). Multivariable logistic regression showed significantly reduced odds of readmission in the intervention group at both 1 week (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66, p = .002) and 30 days (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.88, p = .012), after adjusting for covariates including age, diagnosis severity, satisfaction, and sociodemographic factors.
Conclusions: Readmission rates were decreased after brief, personal physician-patient conversations. These findings support integrating personalized communication strategies into standard care to improve outcomes. Future research should confirm these finding in larger samples and explore optimal frequency and duration of such interactions.
背景:反复住院带来了巨大的经济负担和健康风险。沟通不良和缺乏个性化护理是导致可预防再入院的主要原因。本研究考察了医生和住院患者之间简短的个人对话是否可以减少出院后1周和30天的再入院率,并提高满意度。方法:这项前瞻性病例对照研究纳入以色列一家综合医院内科病房住院的459例患者。纳入18-100岁的患者,不包括痴呆、沟通能力有限或24小时内出院的患者。干预组与医生进行了简短的个人对话。对照组患者在其他病房同时住院,接受标准治疗。11名医生接受1.5小时的培训,每天与患者进行3-5分钟的个人对话,补充标准护理。分别测量出院后7天和30天内的再入院率和患者满意度。结果:干预组(n=249)和对照组(n=210)的基线特征相似,只是干预组年龄较大(66.7岁对62.7岁,p= 0.008)。多变量logistic回归显示干预组在两周内再入院的几率显著降低(OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66, p = )。002)和30天(OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.88, p = )。012),在调整协变量包括年龄、诊断严重程度、满意度和社会人口因素后。结论:经过简短的个人医患对话,再入院率降低。这些发现支持将个性化沟通策略整合到标准护理中以改善结果。未来的研究应该在更大的样本中证实这些发现,并探索这种相互作用的最佳频率和持续时间。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.