Impaired Pulmonary Vascular Reserve in Adults with Repaired Coarctation of Aorta: Prevalence, Correlates, and Association with Disease Severity.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alexander C Egbe, Yogesh N V Reddy, Patricia A Pellikka, Barry A Borlaug
{"title":"Impaired Pulmonary Vascular Reserve in Adults with Repaired Coarctation of Aorta: Prevalence, Correlates, and Association with Disease Severity.","authors":"Alexander C Egbe, Yogesh N V Reddy, Patricia A Pellikka, Barry A Borlaug","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2025.08.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension is associated with cardiovascular events, but when assessed at rest, it has limited sensitivity. Pulmonary vascular reserve can be assessed noninvasively using exercise echocardiography, but this has not been studied in adults with coarctation of aorta (COA). We hypothesized that adults with COA had worse pulmonary vascular reserve compared to controls, and that impaired pulmonary vascular reserve was associated with clinical indices of disease severity independent right ventricular (RV) indices at rest.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We assessed pulmonary vascular reserve using mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope derived from exercise echocardiogram in 41 COA patients and 41 controls. RV contractility was assessed using RV end-systolic pressure-area ratio (RVESPAR), and RV contractile reserves was assessed as ratio of RVESPAR at peak exercise versus rest (RVESPAR_peak/rest).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>COA group had impaired pulmonary vascular reserve (i.e., higher mPAP/CO slope, 2.49±1.02 versus 1.03±0.59 mmHg/l/min, p<0.001) compared to controls. Impaired pulmonary vascular reserve was associated with worse aerobic capacity (lower peak oxygen consumption), neurohormonal activation (higher NT-proBNP), and worse RV contractile (lower RVESPAR_peak/rest), independent of echocardiographic indices at rest. Echocardiographic estimation of mPAP/CO slope was feasible in 85% [35/41]. Of note, the assessment of RV afterload at rest was feasible in 39 (95%) and 33 (81%) patients in the COA and control groups, respectively, but decreased to 32 (78%) and 26 (63%) patients at peak exercise in the COA and control groups, respectively, due to inability to measure tricuspid regurgitation velocity at peak exercise in some patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with COA had impaired pulmonary vascular reserve, as defined by mPAP/CO slope, and higher mPAP/CO slope was associated with worse indices of disease severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2025.08.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension is associated with cardiovascular events, but when assessed at rest, it has limited sensitivity. Pulmonary vascular reserve can be assessed noninvasively using exercise echocardiography, but this has not been studied in adults with coarctation of aorta (COA). We hypothesized that adults with COA had worse pulmonary vascular reserve compared to controls, and that impaired pulmonary vascular reserve was associated with clinical indices of disease severity independent right ventricular (RV) indices at rest.

Method: We assessed pulmonary vascular reserve using mean pulmonary artery pressure/cardiac output (mPAP/CO) slope derived from exercise echocardiogram in 41 COA patients and 41 controls. RV contractility was assessed using RV end-systolic pressure-area ratio (RVESPAR), and RV contractile reserves was assessed as ratio of RVESPAR at peak exercise versus rest (RVESPAR_peak/rest).

Results: COA group had impaired pulmonary vascular reserve (i.e., higher mPAP/CO slope, 2.49±1.02 versus 1.03±0.59 mmHg/l/min, p<0.001) compared to controls. Impaired pulmonary vascular reserve was associated with worse aerobic capacity (lower peak oxygen consumption), neurohormonal activation (higher NT-proBNP), and worse RV contractile (lower RVESPAR_peak/rest), independent of echocardiographic indices at rest. Echocardiographic estimation of mPAP/CO slope was feasible in 85% [35/41]. Of note, the assessment of RV afterload at rest was feasible in 39 (95%) and 33 (81%) patients in the COA and control groups, respectively, but decreased to 32 (78%) and 26 (63%) patients at peak exercise in the COA and control groups, respectively, due to inability to measure tricuspid regurgitation velocity at peak exercise in some patients.

Conclusions: Patients with COA had impaired pulmonary vascular reserve, as defined by mPAP/CO slope, and higher mPAP/CO slope was associated with worse indices of disease severity.

主动脉修复性缩窄成人肺血管储备受损:患病率、相关性及与疾病严重程度的关联
背景:肺动脉高压与心血管事件有关,但在静息时评估,其敏感性有限。肺动脉血管储备可以使用运动超声心动图无创评估,但尚未对成人主动脉缩窄(COA)进行研究。我们假设患有COA的成年人的肺血管储备比对照组更差,并且肺血管储备受损与静止时疾病严重程度独立右心室(RV)指数的临床指标相关。方法:我们利用41例COA患者和41例对照组的运动超声心动图得出的平均肺动脉压/心输出量(mPAP/CO)斜率来评估肺血管储备。采用右心室收缩末期压面积比(RVESPAR)评估右心室收缩能力,采用运动峰值与休息时的RVESPAR比(RVESPAR_peak/rest)评估右心室收缩储备。结果:COA组肺血管储备受损(即mPAP/CO斜率较高,分别为2.49±1.02 mmHg/l/min和1.03±0.59 mmHg/l/min)。结论:根据mPAP/CO斜率定义,COA患者肺血管储备受损,mPAP/CO斜率越高,疾病严重程度指标越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信