Impact of guideline-directed medical therapy on the cardiac or non-cardiac death in acute myocardial infarction.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-29 DOI:10.3904/kjim.2025.068
Jin-Ho Choi, Dahee Hyun, Seung Ho Hur, Seung Woon Rha, Seung Jae Joo, Hyo-Soo Kim, Myung Ho Jeong
{"title":"Impact of guideline-directed medical therapy on the cardiac or non-cardiac death in acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"Jin-Ho Choi, Dahee Hyun, Seung Ho Hur, Seung Woon Rha, Seung Jae Joo, Hyo-Soo Kim, Myung Ho Jeong","doi":"10.3904/kjim.2025.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>While the clinical effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is well established in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), its specific impact on cause-specific mortality remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of GDMT on both cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in AMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of the KAMIR-NIH, a multicenter prospective registry of AMI in Korea between 2011 and 2015, were included. The competing risks of cardiac and non-cardiac death in patients who received GDMT were compared with those who did not, using a multivariable-adjusted cumulative incidence analysis of propensity score-matched patients. Primary endpoint of interest was 3-year cardiac and non-cardiac mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 12,815 patients enrolled, 2,700 matched pairs with a mean age of 64.9 ± 12.2 years were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death (5.0% vs. 8.6%; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-0.67) and non-cardiac death (3.2% vs. 4.5%; sHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92) was significantly lower in patients receiving GDMT compared to those who did not (all p < 0.05). These results were also consistent in 30-day landmark analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with AMI, the use of GDMT was linked to a reduced risk of both cardiac and non-cardiac death over a period of 3 years. These findings support the continued adoption of GDMT in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48785,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"40 5","pages":"780-789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2025.068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: While the clinical effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is well established in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), its specific impact on cause-specific mortality remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of GDMT on both cardiac and non-cardiac mortality in AMI patients.

Methods: Data of the KAMIR-NIH, a multicenter prospective registry of AMI in Korea between 2011 and 2015, were included. The competing risks of cardiac and non-cardiac death in patients who received GDMT were compared with those who did not, using a multivariable-adjusted cumulative incidence analysis of propensity score-matched patients. Primary endpoint of interest was 3-year cardiac and non-cardiac mortality.

Results: Of the 12,815 patients enrolled, 2,700 matched pairs with a mean age of 64.9 ± 12.2 years were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death (5.0% vs. 8.6%; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-0.67) and non-cardiac death (3.2% vs. 4.5%; sHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92) was significantly lower in patients receiving GDMT compared to those who did not (all p < 0.05). These results were also consistent in 30-day landmark analyses.

Conclusion: In patients with AMI, the use of GDMT was linked to a reduced risk of both cardiac and non-cardiac death over a period of 3 years. These findings support the continued adoption of GDMT in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

指南指导的药物治疗对急性心肌梗死心脏或非心脏性死亡的影响
背景/目的:虽然指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中的临床疗效已经确立,但其对病因特异性死亡率的具体影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨GDMT对AMI患者心源性和非心源性死亡率的影响。方法:纳入2011年至2015年韩国AMI多中心前瞻性注册表KAMIR-NIH的数据。使用倾向评分匹配患者的多变量调整累积发生率分析,比较了接受GDMT患者与未接受GDMT患者心脏和非心脏死亡的竞争风险。主要研究终点为3年心脏和非心脏死亡率。结果:在纳入的12,815例患者中,分析了2,700对匹配的患者,平均年龄为64.9±12.2岁。接受GDMT的患者心源性死亡累积发生率(5.0% vs. 8.6%;亚分布风险比[sHR] 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-0.67)和非心源性死亡(3.2% vs. 4.5%; sHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92)显著低于未接受GDMT的患者(均p < 0.05)。这些结果在30天里程碑分析中也是一致的。结论:在AMI患者中,使用GDMT与3年内心脏和非心脏死亡的风险降低有关。这些发现支持在临床实践中继续采用GDMT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
129
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine is an international medical journal published in English by the Korean Association of Internal Medicine. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and editorials on all aspects of medicine, including clinical investigations and basic research. Both human and experimental animal studies are welcome, as are new findings on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Case reports will be published only in exceptional circumstances, when they illustrate a rare occurrence of clinical importance. Letters to the editor are encouraged for specific comments on published articles and general viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信