A National Survey on Oral Feeding Management Practices Across Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Alyssa Alguire, Janine Kowalczyk, Hetta Patel, Sandra Fucile
{"title":"A National Survey on Oral Feeding Management Practices Across Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Units.","authors":"Alyssa Alguire, Janine Kowalczyk, Hetta Patel, Sandra Fucile","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2547372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore oral feeding management practices, specifically initiation and advancement of oral feeds, across level II and III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national online survey was conducted across 65 NICUs (34 level II, 31 level III), which included questions on hospital demographics and clinical approaches for initiating, advancing, and managing oral feeds. A descriptive analysis was performed on the responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 65 NICUs surveyed, 74% (<i>n</i> = 48) completed the survey. Many reported using custom-developed NICU guidelines for initiating and advancing oral feeds (<i>n</i> = 22, 46%), while few used evidence-based protocols (<i>n</i> = 16, 33%) or standardized assessments (<i>n</i> = 1, 2%). The most common clinical factors considered for initiating and advancing oral feeds include, behavioral cues (<i>n</i> = 47, 98%), stable vital signs (<i>n</i> = 47, 98%), gestational age (<i>n</i> = 43, 90%), and suck-swallow-breathe coordination (<i>n</i> = 26, 54%). Most units utilized a multidisciplinary approach (<i>n</i> = 38, 79%) with family involvement (<i>n</i> = 38, 79%). Feeding issues were typically addressed only during hospitalization, with no post-discharge follow-up (<i>n</i> = 31, 65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed significant variation in oral feeding management practices across Canadian level II and III NICUs and highlights a shift toward evidence-based clinical factors for oral feeding initiation and advancement. These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care in NICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2547372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore oral feeding management practices, specifically initiation and advancement of oral feeds, across level II and III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada.

Methods: A national online survey was conducted across 65 NICUs (34 level II, 31 level III), which included questions on hospital demographics and clinical approaches for initiating, advancing, and managing oral feeds. A descriptive analysis was performed on the responses.

Results: Of the 65 NICUs surveyed, 74% (n = 48) completed the survey. Many reported using custom-developed NICU guidelines for initiating and advancing oral feeds (n = 22, 46%), while few used evidence-based protocols (n = 16, 33%) or standardized assessments (n = 1, 2%). The most common clinical factors considered for initiating and advancing oral feeds include, behavioral cues (n = 47, 98%), stable vital signs (n = 47, 98%), gestational age (n = 43, 90%), and suck-swallow-breathe coordination (n = 26, 54%). Most units utilized a multidisciplinary approach (n = 38, 79%) with family involvement (n = 38, 79%). Feeding issues were typically addressed only during hospitalization, with no post-discharge follow-up (n = 31, 65%).

Conclusion: This study revealed significant variation in oral feeding management practices across Canadian level II and III NICUs and highlights a shift toward evidence-based clinical factors for oral feeding initiation and advancement. These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care in NICUs.

加拿大新生儿重症监护病房口服喂养管理实践的全国调查。
目的:探讨加拿大II级和III级新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)的口服喂养管理实践,特别是口服喂养的开始和推进。方法:对65个新生儿重症监护病房(34个II级,31个III级)进行了全国在线调查,其中包括医院人口统计学和开始、推进和管理口服喂养的临床方法的问题。对回答进行描述性分析。结果:在所调查的65个新生儿重症监护病房中,74% (n = 48)完成了调查。许多报告使用定制的NICU指南来启动和推进口服喂养(n = 22, 46%),而很少使用循证方案(n = 16, 33%)或标准化评估(n = 1.2%)。开始和推进口服喂养最常见的临床因素包括行为线索(n = 47, 98%)、稳定的生命体征(n = 47, 98%)、胎龄(n = 43, 90%)和吸吮-吞咽-呼吸协调(n = 26, 54%)。大多数单位采用多学科方法(n = 38,79%),家庭参与(n = 38,79%)。喂养问题通常仅在住院期间得到解决,没有出院后随访(n = 31, 65%)。结论:本研究揭示了加拿大II级和III级新生儿重症监护室口服喂养管理实践的显著差异,并强调了口服喂养开始和进展的循证临床因素的转变。这些发现强调需要制定标准化的循证指南,以确保新生儿重症监护病房的一致和最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信