{"title":"A National Survey on Oral Feeding Management Practices Across Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Units.","authors":"Alyssa Alguire, Janine Kowalczyk, Hetta Patel, Sandra Fucile","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2025.2547372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore oral feeding management practices, specifically initiation and advancement of oral feeds, across level II and III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national online survey was conducted across 65 NICUs (34 level II, 31 level III), which included questions on hospital demographics and clinical approaches for initiating, advancing, and managing oral feeds. A descriptive analysis was performed on the responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 65 NICUs surveyed, 74% (<i>n</i> = 48) completed the survey. Many reported using custom-developed NICU guidelines for initiating and advancing oral feeds (<i>n</i> = 22, 46%), while few used evidence-based protocols (<i>n</i> = 16, 33%) or standardized assessments (<i>n</i> = 1, 2%). The most common clinical factors considered for initiating and advancing oral feeds include, behavioral cues (<i>n</i> = 47, 98%), stable vital signs (<i>n</i> = 47, 98%), gestational age (<i>n</i> = 43, 90%), and suck-swallow-breathe coordination (<i>n</i> = 26, 54%). Most units utilized a multidisciplinary approach (<i>n</i> = 38, 79%) with family involvement (<i>n</i> = 38, 79%). Feeding issues were typically addressed only during hospitalization, with no post-discharge follow-up (<i>n</i> = 31, 65%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed significant variation in oral feeding management practices across Canadian level II and III NICUs and highlights a shift toward evidence-based clinical factors for oral feeding initiation and advancement. These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care in NICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2025.2547372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To explore oral feeding management practices, specifically initiation and advancement of oral feeds, across level II and III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada.
Methods: A national online survey was conducted across 65 NICUs (34 level II, 31 level III), which included questions on hospital demographics and clinical approaches for initiating, advancing, and managing oral feeds. A descriptive analysis was performed on the responses.
Results: Of the 65 NICUs surveyed, 74% (n = 48) completed the survey. Many reported using custom-developed NICU guidelines for initiating and advancing oral feeds (n = 22, 46%), while few used evidence-based protocols (n = 16, 33%) or standardized assessments (n = 1, 2%). The most common clinical factors considered for initiating and advancing oral feeds include, behavioral cues (n = 47, 98%), stable vital signs (n = 47, 98%), gestational age (n = 43, 90%), and suck-swallow-breathe coordination (n = 26, 54%). Most units utilized a multidisciplinary approach (n = 38, 79%) with family involvement (n = 38, 79%). Feeding issues were typically addressed only during hospitalization, with no post-discharge follow-up (n = 31, 65%).
Conclusion: This study revealed significant variation in oral feeding management practices across Canadian level II and III NICUs and highlights a shift toward evidence-based clinical factors for oral feeding initiation and advancement. These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care in NICUs.
期刊介绍:
5 issues per year
Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine