Aortic Valve Replacement with Annular Patch Reconstruction for Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis after the Bentall Procedure: A Case Series.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Surgical Case Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-30 DOI:10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0316
Taiki Matsuoka, Ikuko Shibasaki, Shunsuke Saito, Yusuke Takei, Hirotsugu Fukuda
{"title":"Aortic Valve Replacement with Annular Patch Reconstruction for Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis after the Bentall Procedure: A Case Series.","authors":"Taiki Matsuoka, Ikuko Shibasaki, Shunsuke Saito, Yusuke Takei, Hirotsugu Fukuda","doi":"10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prosthetic valve endocarditis following aortic root replacement (ARR) typically necessitates redo-ARR, which involves complete graft removal, extensive aortic root dissection, and coronary reimplantation. This highly invasive procedure carries substantial surgical risk, including high operative mortality. In select high-risk patients without evidence of prosthetic graft infection, alternative surgical strategies may reduce procedural complexity and improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Here, we report 3 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis following the Bentall procedure, a common ARR technique, in older patients (mean age: 73.7 ± 3.5 years). All preoperative blood cultures were negative, and no signs of prosthetic graft infection were noted on CT. Due to advanced frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale scores of 7 or 8), conventional redo-ARR was deemed prohibitively high-risk. Risk assessment using the JapanSCORE showed a mean predicted mortality of 32.5% ± 21.0%, with combined mortality and morbidity of 63.7% ± 22.9%. Instead of redo-ARR, annular reconstruction using a bovine pericardial patch was performed, followed by redo aortic valve replacement. All patients underwent successful surgery with no postoperative reinfection. One patient required prolonged intensive care and was transferred to another facility for rehabilitation, while the other 2 recovered uneventfully and were discharged. During a mean follow-up of 26.3 ± 17.6 months, 2 patients died due to non-cardiac causes: one from pneumonia and the other from gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In high-risk patients without clear evidence of prosthetic graft infection, aortic valve replacement with annular patch reconstruction may represent a viable alternative to redo-ARR, particularly in settings where homografts are not readily available. This approach reduces operative complexity while maintaining structural integrity. Further studies are warranted to validate infection control criteria and assess long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22096,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Case Reports","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prosthetic valve endocarditis following aortic root replacement (ARR) typically necessitates redo-ARR, which involves complete graft removal, extensive aortic root dissection, and coronary reimplantation. This highly invasive procedure carries substantial surgical risk, including high operative mortality. In select high-risk patients without evidence of prosthetic graft infection, alternative surgical strategies may reduce procedural complexity and improve outcomes.

Case presentation: Here, we report 3 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis following the Bentall procedure, a common ARR technique, in older patients (mean age: 73.7 ± 3.5 years). All preoperative blood cultures were negative, and no signs of prosthetic graft infection were noted on CT. Due to advanced frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale scores of 7 or 8), conventional redo-ARR was deemed prohibitively high-risk. Risk assessment using the JapanSCORE showed a mean predicted mortality of 32.5% ± 21.0%, with combined mortality and morbidity of 63.7% ± 22.9%. Instead of redo-ARR, annular reconstruction using a bovine pericardial patch was performed, followed by redo aortic valve replacement. All patients underwent successful surgery with no postoperative reinfection. One patient required prolonged intensive care and was transferred to another facility for rehabilitation, while the other 2 recovered uneventfully and were discharged. During a mean follow-up of 26.3 ± 17.6 months, 2 patients died due to non-cardiac causes: one from pneumonia and the other from gastric cancer.

Conclusions: In high-risk patients without clear evidence of prosthetic graft infection, aortic valve replacement with annular patch reconstruction may represent a viable alternative to redo-ARR, particularly in settings where homografts are not readily available. This approach reduces operative complexity while maintaining structural integrity. Further studies are warranted to validate infection control criteria and assess long-term outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

本特尔手术后人工瓣膜心内膜炎主动脉瓣置换术与环形补片重建:一个病例系列。
主动脉根部置换术(aortic root replacement, ARR)后的瓣膜心内膜炎通常需要重新植入术(redo-ARR),包括完全移除移植物、广泛主动脉根部剥离和冠状动脉再植。这种高度侵入性的手术有很大的手术风险,包括高手术死亡率。在没有假体感染证据的高危患者中,替代手术策略可以减少手术复杂性并改善预后。病例介绍:在这里,我们报告了3例老年患者(平均年龄:73.7±3.5岁)在本特尔手术(一种常见的ARR技术)后发生的人工瓣膜心内膜炎。术前所有血培养均为阴性,CT上未见假体感染征象。由于晚期虚弱(临床虚弱量表评分为7或8分),传统的redo-ARR被认为是非常危险的。采用JapanSCORE进行的风险评估显示,平均预测死亡率为32.5%±21.0%,死亡率和发病率合计为63.7%±22.9%。用牛心包补片代替重做主动脉瓣置换术,行主动脉瓣环重建,然后重做主动脉瓣置换术。所有患者手术成功,无术后再感染。一名患者需要长时间的重症监护,并被转移到另一家机构进行康复治疗,而其他2名患者则顺利康复并出院。在平均26.3±17.6个月的随访中,2例患者死于非心脏原因:1例死于肺炎,1例死于胃癌。结论:在没有明确证据证明假体感染的高危患者中,主动脉瓣置换术与环形补片重建可能是一种可行的替代reto - arr的方法,特别是在不容易获得同种移植物的情况下。这种方法在保持结构完整性的同时降低了操作的复杂性。需要进一步的研究来验证感染控制标准并评估长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信