Abigayle R Feather, Brent J Shelton, Courtney Blair, D Bront Davis, Joan Scales, Audrey Darville, Joseph Valentino, Laurie E McLouth, Jessica L Burris
{"title":"Rural and Appalachian cancer survivors' responses to tobacco use screening and tobacco treatment offer.","authors":"Abigayle R Feather, Brent J Shelton, Courtney Blair, D Bront Davis, Joan Scales, Audrey Darville, Joseph Valentino, Laurie E McLouth, Jessica L Burris","doi":"10.18332/tid/207082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking after a cancer diagnosis is associated with poor outcomes whereas smoking cessation improves survival and other outcomes. Although professional societies and practice guidelines call for equitable tobacco treatment delivery in healthcare, disparities in tobacco-related disease burden persist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the context of an outpatient US cancer center's population-based tobacco treatment program, this study examines associations between cancer survivors' rural and Appalachian residence status and: 1) current tobacco use status, 2) decision to decline tobacco treatment, and 3) reason for declining assistance. A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis was conducted using electronic health record data from 16839 adults: 64.04% female, 88.49% non-Hispanic White, mean age 59.19 ± 14.52 years, 35.97% rural residence, 53.14% Appalachian residence, who sought cancer care in 2019. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The portion of patients that reported current tobacco use was 21.75%. Rural patients had higher odds of tobacco use than urban (OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.12- 1.34), as did Appalachian patients compared to non-Appalachian (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.28-1.54). Neither rural nor Appalachian residence status was significantly associated with responses to tobacco treatment offers (76.65% declined the offer) or reason for declining (65.19% declined because they were 'not ready to quit').</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight continued need for population-level tobacco use screening and proactive tobacco treatment offers, given elevated tobacco use in some minority groups and overall low rates of tobacco treatment acceptance. This large study helps shed light on the association between geographical residence and tobacco-related outcomes among patients with cancer, and underscores room for improvement in tobacco treatment uptake in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/207082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Smoking after a cancer diagnosis is associated with poor outcomes whereas smoking cessation improves survival and other outcomes. Although professional societies and practice guidelines call for equitable tobacco treatment delivery in healthcare, disparities in tobacco-related disease burden persist.
Methods: In the context of an outpatient US cancer center's population-based tobacco treatment program, this study examines associations between cancer survivors' rural and Appalachian residence status and: 1) current tobacco use status, 2) decision to decline tobacco treatment, and 3) reason for declining assistance. A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis was conducted using electronic health record data from 16839 adults: 64.04% female, 88.49% non-Hispanic White, mean age 59.19 ± 14.52 years, 35.97% rural residence, 53.14% Appalachian residence, who sought cancer care in 2019. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were applied.
Results: The portion of patients that reported current tobacco use was 21.75%. Rural patients had higher odds of tobacco use than urban (OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.12- 1.34), as did Appalachian patients compared to non-Appalachian (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.28-1.54). Neither rural nor Appalachian residence status was significantly associated with responses to tobacco treatment offers (76.65% declined the offer) or reason for declining (65.19% declined because they were 'not ready to quit').
Conclusions: Findings highlight continued need for population-level tobacco use screening and proactive tobacco treatment offers, given elevated tobacco use in some minority groups and overall low rates of tobacco treatment acceptance. This large study helps shed light on the association between geographical residence and tobacco-related outcomes among patients with cancer, and underscores room for improvement in tobacco treatment uptake in cancer care.
期刊介绍:
Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community.
The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.