Rural and Appalachian cancer survivors' responses to tobacco use screening and tobacco treatment offer.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/207082
Abigayle R Feather, Brent J Shelton, Courtney Blair, D Bront Davis, Joan Scales, Audrey Darville, Joseph Valentino, Laurie E McLouth, Jessica L Burris
{"title":"Rural and Appalachian cancer survivors' responses to tobacco use screening and tobacco treatment offer.","authors":"Abigayle R Feather, Brent J Shelton, Courtney Blair, D Bront Davis, Joan Scales, Audrey Darville, Joseph Valentino, Laurie E McLouth, Jessica L Burris","doi":"10.18332/tid/207082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Smoking after a cancer diagnosis is associated with poor outcomes whereas smoking cessation improves survival and other outcomes. Although professional societies and practice guidelines call for equitable tobacco treatment delivery in healthcare, disparities in tobacco-related disease burden persist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the context of an outpatient US cancer center's population-based tobacco treatment program, this study examines associations between cancer survivors' rural and Appalachian residence status and: 1) current tobacco use status, 2) decision to decline tobacco treatment, and 3) reason for declining assistance. A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis was conducted using electronic health record data from 16839 adults: 64.04% female, 88.49% non-Hispanic White, mean age 59.19 ± 14.52 years, 35.97% rural residence, 53.14% Appalachian residence, who sought cancer care in 2019. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The portion of patients that reported current tobacco use was 21.75%. Rural patients had higher odds of tobacco use than urban (OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.12- 1.34), as did Appalachian patients compared to non-Appalachian (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.28-1.54). Neither rural nor Appalachian residence status was significantly associated with responses to tobacco treatment offers (76.65% declined the offer) or reason for declining (65.19% declined because they were 'not ready to quit').</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight continued need for population-level tobacco use screening and proactive tobacco treatment offers, given elevated tobacco use in some minority groups and overall low rates of tobacco treatment acceptance. This large study helps shed light on the association between geographical residence and tobacco-related outcomes among patients with cancer, and underscores room for improvement in tobacco treatment uptake in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/207082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking after a cancer diagnosis is associated with poor outcomes whereas smoking cessation improves survival and other outcomes. Although professional societies and practice guidelines call for equitable tobacco treatment delivery in healthcare, disparities in tobacco-related disease burden persist.

Methods: In the context of an outpatient US cancer center's population-based tobacco treatment program, this study examines associations between cancer survivors' rural and Appalachian residence status and: 1) current tobacco use status, 2) decision to decline tobacco treatment, and 3) reason for declining assistance. A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis was conducted using electronic health record data from 16839 adults: 64.04% female, 88.49% non-Hispanic White, mean age 59.19 ± 14.52 years, 35.97% rural residence, 53.14% Appalachian residence, who sought cancer care in 2019. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were applied.

Results: The portion of patients that reported current tobacco use was 21.75%. Rural patients had higher odds of tobacco use than urban (OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.12- 1.34), as did Appalachian patients compared to non-Appalachian (OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.28-1.54). Neither rural nor Appalachian residence status was significantly associated with responses to tobacco treatment offers (76.65% declined the offer) or reason for declining (65.19% declined because they were 'not ready to quit').

Conclusions: Findings highlight continued need for population-level tobacco use screening and proactive tobacco treatment offers, given elevated tobacco use in some minority groups and overall low rates of tobacco treatment acceptance. This large study helps shed light on the association between geographical residence and tobacco-related outcomes among patients with cancer, and underscores room for improvement in tobacco treatment uptake in cancer care.

农村和阿巴拉契亚地区癌症幸存者对烟草使用筛查和烟草治疗的反应。
简介:癌症诊断后吸烟与不良预后相关,而戒烟可改善生存和其他预后。尽管专业协会和实践指南呼吁在卫生保健中公平提供烟草治疗,但烟草相关疾病负担方面的差距仍然存在。方法:在美国癌症中心门诊人群烟草治疗项目的背景下,本研究考察了癌症幸存者农村和阿巴拉契亚居住状况与以下因素之间的关系:1)目前的烟草使用状况,2)拒绝烟草治疗的决定,以及3)拒绝援助的原因。对2019年寻求癌症治疗的16839名成年人的电子健康记录数据进行横断面回顾性分析:64.04%为女性,88.49%为非西班牙裔白人,平均年龄59.19±14.52岁,35.97%为农村居民,53.14%为阿巴拉契亚居民。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归模型。结果:报告当前吸烟的患者比例为21.75%。农村患者吸烟的几率高于城市患者(OR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.12- 1.34),阿巴拉契亚地区患者吸烟的几率高于非阿巴拉契亚地区患者(OR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.28-1.54)。农村和阿巴拉契亚地区的居住状况与接受烟草治疗(76.65%的人拒绝接受治疗)或拒绝的原因(65.19%的人拒绝接受治疗是因为他们“还没有准备好戒烟”)都没有显著相关。结论:研究结果强调,鉴于一些少数群体的烟草使用率上升和总体烟草治疗接受率较低,继续需要进行人口水平的烟草使用筛查和主动提供烟草治疗。这项大型研究有助于揭示癌症患者的地理居住地与烟草相关结果之间的关系,并强调了癌症治疗中烟草治疗的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信