CT-Optimal Stimulation Modulates Somatosensory Processing.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
A Ribeiro-Carreira, Márcia da-Silva, Ana Rita Pereira, Maria Teresa Carrillo-de-la-Peña, Joana Coutinho, Adriana Sampaio, Alberto J González-Villar
{"title":"CT-Optimal Stimulation Modulates Somatosensory Processing.","authors":"A Ribeiro-Carreira, Márcia da-Silva, Ana Rita Pereira, Maria Teresa Carrillo-de-la-Peña, Joana Coutinho, Adriana Sampaio, Alberto J González-Villar","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Touch has an affective dimension, conveyed through low-threshold mechanoreceptors known as C-tactile (CT) afferents, which are activated by gentle, caress-like contact. While there is evidence that these fibers modulate nociceptive input, their influence on the processing of other somatosensory afferent activity remains largely unknown. In this study, we explored how slow brushing (CT-optimal stimulation) modulates somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by electrical stimulation of the median nerve (occurring at 0.7 to 3.7 s after stimulus onset), compared to vibration (at 200 Hz) and no touch, in 30 healthy participants. CT-targeted stimulation was delivered using a robotic arm developed in-house equipped with a cosmetic brush, which applied slow brushing movements at CT-optimal speeds (~3 cm/s) over the dorsal forearm. Vibrotactile stimulation, targeting A-beta fibers, was delivered using vibration motors adjacent to the brushed area, with intensity calibrated to match the perceived strength of brushing. SEPs were recorded under these three conditions. Our results showed no differences between slow brushing, vibration, and no touch conditions in the amplitude of early SEPs recorded over the somatosensory cortex (N20, P25, N30, and P45), which may indicate that CT stimulation does not affect early cortical processing of somatosensory information. However, a reduced frontocentral P150 SEP component was observed during slow brushing compared to the other conditions. This finding suggests that CT stimulation may reduce somatosensory input transmitted through the lemniscal system, possibly engaging brain areas involved in attentional and cognitive processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 9","pages":"e70146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Touch has an affective dimension, conveyed through low-threshold mechanoreceptors known as C-tactile (CT) afferents, which are activated by gentle, caress-like contact. While there is evidence that these fibers modulate nociceptive input, their influence on the processing of other somatosensory afferent activity remains largely unknown. In this study, we explored how slow brushing (CT-optimal stimulation) modulates somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by electrical stimulation of the median nerve (occurring at 0.7 to 3.7 s after stimulus onset), compared to vibration (at 200 Hz) and no touch, in 30 healthy participants. CT-targeted stimulation was delivered using a robotic arm developed in-house equipped with a cosmetic brush, which applied slow brushing movements at CT-optimal speeds (~3 cm/s) over the dorsal forearm. Vibrotactile stimulation, targeting A-beta fibers, was delivered using vibration motors adjacent to the brushed area, with intensity calibrated to match the perceived strength of brushing. SEPs were recorded under these three conditions. Our results showed no differences between slow brushing, vibration, and no touch conditions in the amplitude of early SEPs recorded over the somatosensory cortex (N20, P25, N30, and P45), which may indicate that CT stimulation does not affect early cortical processing of somatosensory information. However, a reduced frontocentral P150 SEP component was observed during slow brushing compared to the other conditions. This finding suggests that CT stimulation may reduce somatosensory input transmitted through the lemniscal system, possibly engaging brain areas involved in attentional and cognitive processing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

ct优化刺激调节体感觉加工。
触摸具有情感维度,通过被称为c -触觉(CT)传入的低阈值机械感受器传递,这是由温柔的,爱抚般的接触激活的。虽然有证据表明这些纤维调节伤害性输入,但它们对其他体感觉传入活动的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。在这项研究中,我们探讨了30名健康参与者中,与振动(200 Hz)和无触摸相比,缓慢刷牙(ct最佳刺激)如何调节正中神经电刺激(刺激开始后0.7至3.7秒)引发的体感诱发电位(SEPs)。使用内部开发的配有化妆刷的机械臂进行ct靶向刺激,该机械臂以ct最佳速度(~ 3cm /s)在前臂背侧进行缓慢的刷刷运动。针对a - β纤维的振动触觉刺激,使用靠近被刷区域的振动电机进行传递,并校准强度以匹配被刷区域的感知强度。记录三种条件下的sep。我们的研究结果显示,在慢刷、振动和无触摸条件下,体感皮层(N20、P25、N30和P45)记录的早期sep振幅没有差异,这可能表明CT刺激不会影响体感信息的早期皮层加工。然而,与其他条件相比,在缓慢刷牙时观察到前额中央P150 SEP成分减少。这一发现表明,CT刺激可能会减少通过大脑系统传递的体感输入,可能会影响到与注意力和认知处理有关的大脑区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信