Best Evidence Summary for Perioperative Pain Management in Patients With Pectus Excavatum.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-08-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/8823617
Yi Liang, Huajian Peng, Xinxin Huang, Guanbiao Liang
{"title":"Best Evidence Summary for Perioperative Pain Management in Patients With Pectus Excavatum.","authors":"Yi Liang, Huajian Peng, Xinxin Huang, Guanbiao Liang","doi":"10.1155/prm/8823617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Pectus excavatum is a common congenital chest wall deformity that can lead to significant cardiopulmonary compression and psychological distress. The minimally invasive Nuss procedure is the standard treatment, but it often results in severe postoperative pain. Effective perioperative pain management is essential to enhance recovery and improve patient outcomes. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to synthesize the most effective evidence on perioperative pain management in patients with pectus excavatum and to provide evidence-based management methods for clinical teams and patients undergoing this surgery. <b>Methods:</b> Guided by the \"6S\" pyramid model, we retrieved evidence on perioperative pain management from relevant websites, databases, and unpublished gray literature. The search timeframe ranged from 2014 to December 2024. Two researchers independently evaluated the literature quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) for guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool for other types of literature. Two researchers independently extracted and summarized the evidence according to the principle of high-quality evidence and newly published evidence. <b>Results:</b> A total of 39 articles were retrieved, of which 6 were guidelines, 6 were expert consensus, 7 were systematic reviews, 1 was a clinical decision, 11 were randomized controlled trials, and 8 were cohort studies. Overall, 35 pieces of evidence from seven dimensions-general principles, education and counseling, pain assessment, preemptive analgesia, intraoperative analgesia, postoperative pain management, and pain management after discharge-were summarized. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study summarized the best evidence on perioperative pain management in patients with pectus excavatum, providing a comprehensive and scientific approach to enhance recovery and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8823617"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8823617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pectus excavatum is a common congenital chest wall deformity that can lead to significant cardiopulmonary compression and psychological distress. The minimally invasive Nuss procedure is the standard treatment, but it often results in severe postoperative pain. Effective perioperative pain management is essential to enhance recovery and improve patient outcomes. Objectives: This study aimed to synthesize the most effective evidence on perioperative pain management in patients with pectus excavatum and to provide evidence-based management methods for clinical teams and patients undergoing this surgery. Methods: Guided by the "6S" pyramid model, we retrieved evidence on perioperative pain management from relevant websites, databases, and unpublished gray literature. The search timeframe ranged from 2014 to December 2024. Two researchers independently evaluated the literature quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) for guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool for other types of literature. Two researchers independently extracted and summarized the evidence according to the principle of high-quality evidence and newly published evidence. Results: A total of 39 articles were retrieved, of which 6 were guidelines, 6 were expert consensus, 7 were systematic reviews, 1 was a clinical decision, 11 were randomized controlled trials, and 8 were cohort studies. Overall, 35 pieces of evidence from seven dimensions-general principles, education and counseling, pain assessment, preemptive analgesia, intraoperative analgesia, postoperative pain management, and pain management after discharge-were summarized. Conclusions: This study summarized the best evidence on perioperative pain management in patients with pectus excavatum, providing a comprehensive and scientific approach to enhance recovery and patient satisfaction.

Abstract Image

漏斗胸围手术期疼痛处理的最佳证据总结。
背景:漏斗胸是一种常见的先天性胸壁畸形,可导致严重的心肺压迫和心理困扰。微创Nuss手术是标准的治疗方法,但它往往导致严重的术后疼痛。有效的围手术期疼痛管理对于提高患者康复和改善预后至关重要。目的:本研究旨在综合漏斗胸围手术期疼痛管理的最有效证据,为临床团队和接受漏斗胸手术的患者提供循证管理方法。方法:以“6S”金字塔模型为指导,从相关网站、数据库和未发表的灰色文献中检索围手术期疼痛管理的相关证据。搜索时间范围从2014年到2024年12月。两名研究人员使用研究和评估指南评估II (AGREE II)作为指南和乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)对其他类型文献的关键评估工具独立评估文献质量。根据高质量证据和新发表证据的原则,由两位研究者独立提取和总结证据。结果:共检索到39篇文献,其中指南6篇,专家共识6篇,系统评价7篇,临床决策1篇,随机对照试验11篇,队列研究8篇。总的来说,我们总结了来自一般原则、教育和咨询、疼痛评估、先发制人的镇痛、术中镇痛、术后疼痛管理和出院后疼痛管理等七个维度的35条证据。结论:本研究总结了漏斗胸围手术期疼痛处理的最佳证据,为提高患者的康复和满意度提供了全面、科学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信