Melissa M Crane, Catherine Feit, Chen Yeh, Mariangeline Gonzalez Ortiz, Bradley M Appelhans
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Behavioral Weight Loss Programs for Men in Trade and Labor Occupations: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Melissa M Crane, Catherine Feit, Chen Yeh, Mariangeline Gonzalez Ortiz, Bradley M Appelhans","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Men who work in trade and labor occupations experience high rates of obesity but are underrepresented in weight control programs. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a program tailored to this working group compared with a standard (untailored) weight loss program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants for this study were recruited via direct mail, a university medical center, and other efforts. They were randomly assigned to either a tailored program or a standard program. Both programs were delivered via 16 one-hour virtual group sessions over six months. Semi-structured interviews and self-reports were used to assess the acceptability of the interventions. Feasibility was assessed using recruitment metrics and proportion group sessions and completed study assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 28; median 44.0 years, 31.8 BMI) were recruited into the study over 7 months, and 71% and 79% were retained for assessments at 3 and 6 months. Participants attended a median of 9.5 (tailored) and 5 (standard) of the 16 group sessions. All participants who completed the 6-month assessment in both groups reported that they would recommend the programs to other men. Participants achieved a median weight loss of 2.3% at 6 months (tailored: -3.0%; standard: -1.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that tailoring strategies identified in the formative work were feasible and potentially capable of producing weight loss similar to a standard program. Future research should focus on increasing recruitment and engagement before proceeding to a fully powered efficacy trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05386238.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"11 2","pages":"e70066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Men who work in trade and labor occupations experience high rates of obesity but are underrepresented in weight control programs. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a program tailored to this working group compared with a standard (untailored) weight loss program.
Methods: Participants for this study were recruited via direct mail, a university medical center, and other efforts. They were randomly assigned to either a tailored program or a standard program. Both programs were delivered via 16 one-hour virtual group sessions over six months. Semi-structured interviews and self-reports were used to assess the acceptability of the interventions. Feasibility was assessed using recruitment metrics and proportion group sessions and completed study assessments.
Results: Participants (N = 28; median 44.0 years, 31.8 BMI) were recruited into the study over 7 months, and 71% and 79% were retained for assessments at 3 and 6 months. Participants attended a median of 9.5 (tailored) and 5 (standard) of the 16 group sessions. All participants who completed the 6-month assessment in both groups reported that they would recommend the programs to other men. Participants achieved a median weight loss of 2.3% at 6 months (tailored: -3.0%; standard: -1.9%).
Conclusions: This study suggests that tailoring strategies identified in the formative work were feasible and potentially capable of producing weight loss similar to a standard program. Future research should focus on increasing recruitment and engagement before proceeding to a fully powered efficacy trial.