Retinal Layer Thickness and Volume Measurements in Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Naveen Karthik, Sejal D Patel, Grant A Justin, Sandra S Stinnett, Stephanie J Chiu, Nathan T Tagg, Rupesh Agrawal, Dilraj S Grewal, Sharon Fekrat
{"title":"Retinal Layer Thickness and Volume Measurements in Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Naveen Karthik, Sejal D Patel, Grant A Justin, Sandra S Stinnett, Stephanie J Chiu, Nathan T Tagg, Rupesh Agrawal, Dilraj S Grewal, Sharon Fekrat","doi":"10.1177/24741264251367104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess retinal layer thickness and volume by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with prior traumatic brain injury (TBI). <b>Methods:</b> Adults (≥18 years) with prior TBI were prospectively recruited. 512 × 128-mm macular cube scans were obtained using Zeiss Cirrus HD-5000 OCT. The previously validated Duke Reading Center's DRCVisualizer semiautomatically segmented (manually corrected) the ganglion cell-inner plexiform (GC-IPL), inner nuclear (INL), outer plexiform (OPL), outer nuclear (ONL), photoreceptors (PR), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layers. Mean thickness and volume were obtained within 3- and 6-mm ETDRS perifoveal rings. Individuals were age- and sex-matched (±5 years) with controls. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-eight patients with TBI (66 eyes; mean ± SD age 45 ± 19 years) and 37 controls (66 eyes; age 44 ± 18 years) were enrolled. Time from TBI to imaging was a mean ± SD 136 ± 89 weeks. TBI was categorized by severity (mild without loss of consciousness [LOC] [n = 25], mild with LOC [n = 35], moderate [n = 6]) and injury mechanism (nonpenetrating contact [n = 54], acceleration-deceleration [n = 12]). Mean GC-IPL was significantly decreased and mean OPL thickness and volume were significantly increased in male TBI patients versus controls. Eyes with moderate TBI had significantly increased mean neurosensory retina, INL, OPL, and RPE thickness and volume versus other TBI severity groups. Eyes with nonpenetrating contact TBI had significantly increased mean neurosensory retina and ONL thickness and volume versus eyes with acceleration-deceleration TBI. All eyes showed a significant correlation for decreasing mean GC-IPL thickness and volume with time from TBI to imaging. <b>Conclusions:</b> TBI may impact thickness and volume of the retinal layers, and changes may be progressive over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251367104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251367104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess retinal layer thickness and volume by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with prior traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Adults (≥18 years) with prior TBI were prospectively recruited. 512 × 128-mm macular cube scans were obtained using Zeiss Cirrus HD-5000 OCT. The previously validated Duke Reading Center's DRCVisualizer semiautomatically segmented (manually corrected) the ganglion cell-inner plexiform (GC-IPL), inner nuclear (INL), outer plexiform (OPL), outer nuclear (ONL), photoreceptors (PR), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layers. Mean thickness and volume were obtained within 3- and 6-mm ETDRS perifoveal rings. Individuals were age- and sex-matched (±5 years) with controls. Results: Thirty-eight patients with TBI (66 eyes; mean ± SD age 45 ± 19 years) and 37 controls (66 eyes; age 44 ± 18 years) were enrolled. Time from TBI to imaging was a mean ± SD 136 ± 89 weeks. TBI was categorized by severity (mild without loss of consciousness [LOC] [n = 25], mild with LOC [n = 35], moderate [n = 6]) and injury mechanism (nonpenetrating contact [n = 54], acceleration-deceleration [n = 12]). Mean GC-IPL was significantly decreased and mean OPL thickness and volume were significantly increased in male TBI patients versus controls. Eyes with moderate TBI had significantly increased mean neurosensory retina, INL, OPL, and RPE thickness and volume versus other TBI severity groups. Eyes with nonpenetrating contact TBI had significantly increased mean neurosensory retina and ONL thickness and volume versus eyes with acceleration-deceleration TBI. All eyes showed a significant correlation for decreasing mean GC-IPL thickness and volume with time from TBI to imaging. Conclusions: TBI may impact thickness and volume of the retinal layers, and changes may be progressive over time.

外伤性脑损伤视网膜层厚度和体积测量。
目的:利用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)评价创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者视网膜层厚度和体积。方法:前瞻性招募有TBI病史的成人(≥18岁)。使用蔡司Cirrus HD-5000 oct获得512 × 128毫米的黄斑立方体扫描。先前验证的杜克阅读中心的DRCVisualizer半自动分割(手动校正)神经节细胞-内网状(GC-IPL)、内核(INL)、外网状(OPL)、外核(ONL)、光受体(PR)和视网膜色素上皮(RPE)层。平均厚度和体积在3和6毫米ETDRS包皮环内。个体与对照组年龄和性别匹配(±5岁)。结果:纳入38例TBI患者(66眼,平均±SD年龄45±19岁)和37例对照患者(66眼,年龄44±18岁)。从TBI到成像的平均±SD为136±89周。TBI按严重程度(轻度无意识丧失[LOC] [n = 25]、轻度伴LOC [n = 35]、中度[n = 6])和损伤机制(非穿透性接触[n = 54]、加速-减速[n = 12])进行分类。与对照组相比,男性TBI患者的平均GC-IPL显著降低,平均OPL厚度和体积显著增加。与其他TBI严重程度组相比,中度TBI患者的平均神经感觉视网膜、INL、OPL和RPE厚度和体积显著增加。非穿透性接触性脑损伤的眼与加速-减速性脑损伤相比,平均神经感觉视网膜和ONL厚度和体积显著增加。所有眼睛的平均气相色谱- ipl厚度和体积的下降与从TBI到成像的时间有显著的相关性。结论:创伤性脑损伤可影响视网膜层的厚度和体积,且随时间变化可能是进行性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信