Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dexmedetomidine in Spinal Fusion Surgery.

IF 1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
María Jesús Rodríguez, Alfonso Vázquez, Víctor Rodriguez-Domínguez, Pedro Ramon Mata, Gonzalo Mariscal
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dexmedetomidine in Spinal Fusion Surgery.","authors":"María Jesús Rodríguez, Alfonso Vázquez, Víctor Rodriguez-Domínguez, Pedro Ramon Mata, Gonzalo Mariscal","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2548903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been proposed as an opioid-sparing adjunct after spinal fusion, but its efficacy across age groups is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42024531252). Twelve studies (RCTs and cohorts; n=1,644) were included. Outcomes were postoperative pain (VAS), opioid consumption, and adverse events. DEX significantly reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.77) and respiratory adverse events (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.39). Among adults, effects on VAS and opioid consumption were not significant; pediatric cohorts showed a trend toward lower morphine use. Certainty of evidence was appraised with GRADE; risk of bias with RoB 2.0 and MINORS. Heterogeneity for opioid-related outcomes was high (I²=96%). In summary, DEX appears to be a safe adjunct for postoperative analgesia after spinal fusion, with clearer benefits on adverse-effect profiles and potential opioid-sparing effects in pediatric patients. Its impact on adult pain and opioid outcomes is limited. Further adequately powered trials should clarify optimal dosing, timing, and administration routes and explore age-specific effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2548903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) has been proposed as an opioid-sparing adjunct after spinal fusion, but its efficacy across age groups is unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA and registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42024531252). Twelve studies (RCTs and cohorts; n=1,644) were included. Outcomes were postoperative pain (VAS), opioid consumption, and adverse events. DEX significantly reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.77) and respiratory adverse events (OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.39). Among adults, effects on VAS and opioid consumption were not significant; pediatric cohorts showed a trend toward lower morphine use. Certainty of evidence was appraised with GRADE; risk of bias with RoB 2.0 and MINORS. Heterogeneity for opioid-related outcomes was high (I²=96%). In summary, DEX appears to be a safe adjunct for postoperative analgesia after spinal fusion, with clearer benefits on adverse-effect profiles and potential opioid-sparing effects in pediatric patients. Its impact on adult pain and opioid outcomes is limited. Further adequately powered trials should clarify optimal dosing, timing, and administration routes and explore age-specific effects.

右美托咪定在脊柱融合术中的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
右美托咪定(DEX)已被提议作为脊柱融合术后阿片类药物节约的辅助药物,但其在不同年龄组的疗效尚不清楚。我们在PRISMA之后进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,并在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)注册(CRD42024531252)。纳入了12项研究(随机对照试验和队列;n=1,644)。结果是术后疼痛(VAS)、阿片类药物消耗和不良事件。DEX显著减少了术后恶心和呕吐(OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.77)和呼吸系统不良事件(OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.39)。在成人中,对VAS和阿片类药物消耗的影响不显著;儿科队列显示出吗啡使用减少的趋势。证据的确定性用GRADE评价;RoB 2.0和未成年人的偏倚风险。阿片类药物相关结果的异质性很高(I²=96%)。综上所述,DEX似乎是脊柱融合术后镇痛的一种安全的辅助药物,在儿科患者的不良反应和潜在的阿片类药物节约效应方面具有更明确的益处。它对成人疼痛和阿片类药物结局的影响有限。进一步充分支持的试验应阐明最佳给药剂量、时间和给药途径,并探索年龄特异性效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信