Perioperative Management of Carotid Blowout Syndrome After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Case Series.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pratik S Vadlamudi, Andrew D P Prince, Zachary M Wilseck, Christian Schaaff, Yuan Yuan, Graciela Mentz, Keith Casper, Neeraj Chaudhary, Joshua Glauser, Samuel A Schechtman
{"title":"Perioperative Management of Carotid Blowout Syndrome After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Case Series.","authors":"Pratik S Vadlamudi, Andrew D P Prince, Zachary M Wilseck, Christian Schaaff, Yuan Yuan, Graciela Mentz, Keith Casper, Neeraj Chaudhary, Joshua Glauser, Samuel A Schechtman","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a life-threatening emergency involving the rupture of the carotid arteries and/or branches, often following surgery and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Our case series aimed to describe airway management strategies, endovascular and surgical approaches, perioperative resuscitation management, and clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with CBS at a tertiary referral academic health center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients presenting with CBS between 2017 and 2021. Airway management, procedural treatment techniques, perioperative management, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the chart for each CBS occurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 76 total cases among 62 patients (n=20 [26.3%] female; median age: 61.5 [IQR: 56 to 67]). Three cases were type I (threatened), 18 were type II (impending), 53 were type III (active bleed), and 2 were undeterminable. The most common airway management strategies were a pre-existing airway (n=37 [48.7%]), oral awake bronchoscopic intubation (n=14 [18.4%] occurrences), or nasal awake bronchoscopic intubation (n=8 [10.5%] occurrences). Resuscitation per case included intravenous crystalloid (mean: 1484 mL, SD: 791 mL), red blood cells (mean: 272 mL, SD: 906 mL), fresh frozen plasma (mean: 49 mL, SD: 400 mL), and platelets (mean: 11 mL, SD: 94 mL). Perioperative mortality was 16.1%. Thirty-nine patients (62.9%) died by the time of review (median: 157 mo, IQR: 92 to 205 mo).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perioperative management of CBS is challenging, particularly airway management, in which awake bronchoscopic intubation was common. Endovascular interventions were commonly performed. The investigation highlights the importance of advanced airway management strategies for patients with CBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a life-threatening emergency involving the rupture of the carotid arteries and/or branches, often following surgery and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Our case series aimed to describe airway management strategies, endovascular and surgical approaches, perioperative resuscitation management, and clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with CBS at a tertiary referral academic health center.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients presenting with CBS between 2017 and 2021. Airway management, procedural treatment techniques, perioperative management, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the chart for each CBS occurrence.

Results: We identified 76 total cases among 62 patients (n=20 [26.3%] female; median age: 61.5 [IQR: 56 to 67]). Three cases were type I (threatened), 18 were type II (impending), 53 were type III (active bleed), and 2 were undeterminable. The most common airway management strategies were a pre-existing airway (n=37 [48.7%]), oral awake bronchoscopic intubation (n=14 [18.4%] occurrences), or nasal awake bronchoscopic intubation (n=8 [10.5%] occurrences). Resuscitation per case included intravenous crystalloid (mean: 1484 mL, SD: 791 mL), red blood cells (mean: 272 mL, SD: 906 mL), fresh frozen plasma (mean: 49 mL, SD: 400 mL), and platelets (mean: 11 mL, SD: 94 mL). Perioperative mortality was 16.1%. Thirty-nine patients (62.9%) died by the time of review (median: 157 mo, IQR: 92 to 205 mo).

Conclusions: Perioperative management of CBS is challenging, particularly airway management, in which awake bronchoscopic intubation was common. Endovascular interventions were commonly performed. The investigation highlights the importance of advanced airway management strategies for patients with CBS.

头颈部肿瘤治疗后颈动脉爆裂综合征的围手术期处理:回顾性病例系列。
背景:颈动脉爆裂综合征(CBS)是一种危及生命的紧急情况,涉及颈动脉和/或分支破裂,通常在头颈癌手术和放疗后发生。我们的病例系列旨在描述在三级转诊学术卫生中心的CBS患者队列的气道管理策略、血管内和手术入路、围手术期复苏管理和临床结果。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2021年间出现CBS的患者。从每次CBS发生的图表中提取气道管理、程序治疗技术、围手术期管理和临床结果。结果:62例患者共76例,其中女性20例(26.3%),中位年龄61.5岁(IQR: 56 ~ 67)。3例为I型(威胁),18例为II型(即将发生),53例为III型(活动性出血),2例无法确定。最常见的气道管理策略是已有气道(n=37[48.7%]),经口清醒支气管镜插管(n=14[18.4%]例),或经鼻清醒支气管镜插管(n=8[10.5%]例)。每例复苏包括静脉晶体(平均:1484 mL, SD: 791 mL)、红细胞(平均:272 mL, SD: 906 mL)、新鲜冷冻血浆(平均:49 mL, SD: 400 mL)和血小板(平均:11 mL, SD: 94 mL)。围手术期死亡率为16.1%。39例(62.9%)患者在回顾时死亡(中位数:157个月,IQR: 92至205个月)。结论:CBS的围手术期管理是具有挑战性的,特别是气道管理,其中清醒支气管镜插管是常见的。通常进行血管内介入治疗。该研究强调了先进的气道管理策略对CBS患者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信