{"title":"Emulating visual evaluations in the microscopic agglutination test with deep learning","authors":"Risa Nakano , Yuji Oyamada , Ryo Ozuru , Satoshi Miyahara , Michinobu Yoshimura , Kenji Hiromatsu","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) is widely recognized as the gold standard for diagnosing zoonosis leptospirosis. However, the MAT relies on subjective evaluations by human experts, which can lead to inconsistencies and inter-observer variability. In this study, we aimed to emulate expert assessments using deep learning and convert them into reproducible numerical outputs to achieve greater objectivity. By leveraging a pre-trained DenseNet121, the network benefits from better initialization, facilitating more effective training. We validated our approach using an in-house dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed network achieved accurate agglutination rate estimates. In addition, we employed UMAP, a dimensionality reduction technique, to visualize the learned feature representations, revealing that the network captured image features indicative of <em>Leptospira</em> abundance. Overall, our findings suggest that deep learning can consistently estimate agglutination rates in a manner that approximates expert evaluations and that enhancing interpretability provides visual cues that could aid in understanding the behavior of deep learning models, potentially facilitating future clinical integration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701225001654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) is widely recognized as the gold standard for diagnosing zoonosis leptospirosis. However, the MAT relies on subjective evaluations by human experts, which can lead to inconsistencies and inter-observer variability. In this study, we aimed to emulate expert assessments using deep learning and convert them into reproducible numerical outputs to achieve greater objectivity. By leveraging a pre-trained DenseNet121, the network benefits from better initialization, facilitating more effective training. We validated our approach using an in-house dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed network achieved accurate agglutination rate estimates. In addition, we employed UMAP, a dimensionality reduction technique, to visualize the learned feature representations, revealing that the network captured image features indicative of Leptospira abundance. Overall, our findings suggest that deep learning can consistently estimate agglutination rates in a manner that approximates expert evaluations and that enhancing interpretability provides visual cues that could aid in understanding the behavior of deep learning models, potentially facilitating future clinical integration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.