Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S541271
Jinrun Jia, Shiqiao Zhao
{"title":"Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.","authors":"Jinrun Jia, Shiqiao Zhao","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S541271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The application of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the healthcare sector can significantly enhance the efficiency of China's healthcare services. However, risks persist in terms of accuracy, transparency, data privacy, ethics, and bias. These risks are manifested in three key areas: first, the potential erosion of human agency; second, issues of fairness and justice; and third, questions of liability and responsibility. This study reviews and analyzes the legal and regulatory frameworks established in China for the application of generative AI in healthcare, as well as relevant academic literature. Our research findings indicate that while China is actively constructing an ethical and legal governance framework in this field, the regulatory system remains inadequate and faces numerous challenges. These challenges include lagging regulatory rules; an unclear legal status of AI in laws such as the Civil Code; immature standards and regulatory schemes for medical AI training data; and the lack of a coordinated regulatory mechanism among different government departments. In response, this study attempts to establish a governance framework for generative AI in the medical field in China from both legal and ethical perspectives, yielding relevant research findings. Given the latest developments in generative AI in China, it is necessary to address the challenges of its application in the medical field from both ethical and legal perspectives. This includes enhancing algorithm transparency, standardizing medical data management, and promoting AI legislation. As AI technology continues to evolve, more diverse technical models will emerge in the future. This study also proposes that to address potential risks associated with medical AI, efforts should be made to establish a global AI ethics review committee to promote the formation of internationally unified ethical and legal review mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5405-5419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S541271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The application of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the healthcare sector can significantly enhance the efficiency of China's healthcare services. However, risks persist in terms of accuracy, transparency, data privacy, ethics, and bias. These risks are manifested in three key areas: first, the potential erosion of human agency; second, issues of fairness and justice; and third, questions of liability and responsibility. This study reviews and analyzes the legal and regulatory frameworks established in China for the application of generative AI in healthcare, as well as relevant academic literature. Our research findings indicate that while China is actively constructing an ethical and legal governance framework in this field, the regulatory system remains inadequate and faces numerous challenges. These challenges include lagging regulatory rules; an unclear legal status of AI in laws such as the Civil Code; immature standards and regulatory schemes for medical AI training data; and the lack of a coordinated regulatory mechanism among different government departments. In response, this study attempts to establish a governance framework for generative AI in the medical field in China from both legal and ethical perspectives, yielding relevant research findings. Given the latest developments in generative AI in China, it is necessary to address the challenges of its application in the medical field from both ethical and legal perspectives. This includes enhancing algorithm transparency, standardizing medical data management, and promoting AI legislation. As AI technology continues to evolve, more diverse technical models will emerge in the future. This study also proposes that to address potential risks associated with medical AI, efforts should be made to establish a global AI ethics review committee to promote the formation of internationally unified ethical and legal review mechanisms.

Abstract Image

中国医疗保健中生成式人工智能的伦理与法律治理。
生成式人工智能(AI)技术在医疗领域的应用可以显著提高中国医疗服务的效率。然而,在准确性、透明度、数据隐私、道德和偏见方面,风险仍然存在。这些风险表现在三个关键领域:首先,人的能动性可能受到侵蚀;二是公平正义问题;第三,责任和责任的问题。本研究回顾和分析了中国为生成式人工智能在医疗保健领域的应用而建立的法律和监管框架,以及相关的学术文献。我们的研究结果表明,尽管中国正在积极构建这一领域的道德和法律治理框架,但监管体系仍然不完善,面临诸多挑战。这些挑战包括监管规则滞后;人工智能在《民法典》等法律中的法律地位不明确;医疗人工智能训练数据的标准和监管方案不成熟;不同政府部门之间缺乏协调的监管机制。因此,本研究试图从法律和伦理两个角度建立中国医疗领域生成式人工智能的治理框架,并取得相关研究成果。鉴于中国生成式人工智能的最新发展,有必要从伦理和法律的角度解决其在医疗领域应用所面临的挑战。这包括提高算法透明度,规范医疗数据管理,推动人工智能立法。随着人工智能技术的不断发展,未来将出现更多样化的技术模式。本研究还提出,针对医疗人工智能的潜在风险,应努力建立全球人工智能伦理审查委员会,推动形成国际统一的伦理法律审查机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信