Validity and Reliability of a Self-Administered Questionnaire for 24-Hour Movement Behaviors.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aino Kitayama, Kaori Ishii, Ai Shibata, Akitomo Yasunaga, Bronwyn Clark, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Koichiro Oka
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of a Self-Administered Questionnaire for 24-Hour Movement Behaviors.","authors":"Aino Kitayama, Kaori Ishii, Ai Shibata, Akitomo Yasunaga, Bronwyn Clark, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Koichiro Oka","doi":"10.2188/jea.JE20250185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brief measures of 24-hour movement behaviors are needed to easily evaluate their durations. The present study investigated the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of a brief self-report instrument to assess 24-hour movement behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A paper-based self-administered questionnaire was used to assess sleep, sedentary behavior (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) with four items in 35 healthy adults. Participants wore a tri-axial accelerometer and answered the questionnaire on the final day of the accelerometry assessment and after 14 days. Spearman's correlations of self-reported measures with their accelerometer-derived counterparts were assessed and median values compared by Mann-Whitney U-tests. Bland-Altman plots were employed to characterize differences in self-reported and device-measured time in the behaviors and their limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate correlations with device measures for sleep, SB, and LPA for a typical and the past week (rho = 0.46 to 0.60) and low correlations for MVPA (rho = 0.33 to 0.47) were observed. Less duration of sleep and MVPA were reported compared with accelerometer-derived durations for the three recall periods (z = -3.9 to -2.5 and -4.0 to -3.5, respectively). The test-retest reliability for a typical week was fair-to-good or excellent for all the four behaviors (ICCs = 0.72 - 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings show acceptable validity and reliability of this questionnaire measure of 24-hour movement behaviors for typical week, past week and previous day recall periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":15799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20250185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Brief measures of 24-hour movement behaviors are needed to easily evaluate their durations. The present study investigated the criterion validity and test-retest reliability of a brief self-report instrument to assess 24-hour movement behaviors.

Methods: A paper-based self-administered questionnaire was used to assess sleep, sedentary behavior (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) with four items in 35 healthy adults. Participants wore a tri-axial accelerometer and answered the questionnaire on the final day of the accelerometry assessment and after 14 days. Spearman's correlations of self-reported measures with their accelerometer-derived counterparts were assessed and median values compared by Mann-Whitney U-tests. Bland-Altman plots were employed to characterize differences in self-reported and device-measured time in the behaviors and their limits of agreement. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results: Moderate correlations with device measures for sleep, SB, and LPA for a typical and the past week (rho = 0.46 to 0.60) and low correlations for MVPA (rho = 0.33 to 0.47) were observed. Less duration of sleep and MVPA were reported compared with accelerometer-derived durations for the three recall periods (z = -3.9 to -2.5 and -4.0 to -3.5, respectively). The test-retest reliability for a typical week was fair-to-good or excellent for all the four behaviors (ICCs = 0.72 - 0.90).

Conclusion: Findings show acceptable validity and reliability of this questionnaire measure of 24-hour movement behaviors for typical week, past week and previous day recall periods.

24小时运动行为自填问卷的效度与信度。
背景:需要对24小时运动行为进行简短的测量,以方便地评估其持续时间。本研究探讨了一种评估24小时运动行为的简易自述量表的效度和重测信度。方法:采用纸质自填问卷对35名健康成人进行睡眠、久坐行为(SB)、轻强度体力活动(LPA)和中高强度体力活动(MVPA)四个项目的评估。参与者佩戴三轴加速度计,并在加速度计评估的最后一天和14天后回答问卷。Spearman的自我报告测量值与加速度计衍生对应值的相关性进行了评估,并通过Mann-Whitney u检验比较了中值。采用Bland-Altman图来表征自我报告和设备测量的行为时间的差异及其一致限度。使用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估重测信度。结果:观察到典型和过去一周的睡眠,SB和LPA与设备测量的中度相关性(rho = 0.46至0.60)和MVPA的低相关性(rho = 0.33至0.47)。与加速度计得出的三个回忆期的持续时间(z分别= -3.9至-2.5和-4.0至-3.5)相比,睡眠时间和MVPA更短。典型一周的四种行为的重测信度均为良好或优秀(ICCs = 0.72 - 0.90)。结论:本问卷对典型周、过去一周和前一天回忆时段的24小时运动行为测量具有良好的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Epidemiology
Journal of Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology is the official open access scientific journal of the Japan Epidemiological Association. The Journal publishes a broad range of original research on epidemiology as it relates to human health, and aims to promote communication among those engaged in the field of epidemiological research and those who use epidemiological findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信