Safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-08 DOI:10.1177/03000605251372495
Yuankai Lv, Gongchen Duan, Yini Wu, Jianxin Jiang, Minji You, Faxing Wang, Jimin Wu, Hong Dai
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yuankai Lv, Gongchen Duan, Yini Wu, Jianxin Jiang, Minji You, Faxing Wang, Jimin Wu, Hong Dai","doi":"10.1177/03000605251372495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe sedation protocol for flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy has long been a matter of inconclusiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and provide insights for optimizing clinical anesthesia strategies.MethodsThis study was a randomized, single-blind controlled trial. A total of 118 patients who underwent flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy were randomized into two groups (59 patients per group). Both groups received intravenous alfentanil 10 µg/kg 2 min before sedation treatment, followed by either 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam (Group R) or 2 mg/kg propofol (Group P). During the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy, the experimental drugs were administered in patients in each group as needed to maintain the depth of sedation (modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation score ≤ 3). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes included other safety outcomes and effectiveness outcomes.ResultsA total of 115 participants completed the study. Compared with Group P, the incidence of severe hypoxemia in Group R was lower (3.4% vs. 15.8%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.029); the incidences of injection pain and hypotension in Group R were lower (10.3% vs. 33.3%, <i>P </i>=<i> </i>0.003); and the incidences of hypotension, dizziness, and grade of cough in Group R were lower (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0.05). The sedation success rate and sedation success rate at an induced dose were similar between Groups R and P (<i>P > </i>0.05). Compared with Group P, sedation recovery time in Group R was shorter, and the operator comfort scores and patient comfort scores in Group R were higher (<i>P </i><<i> </i>0.05).ConclusionsRemimazolam, when combined with alfentanil, has shown excellent clinical potential in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Compared with propofol, it significantly reduced the incidence of severe hypoxemia, injection pain, hypotension, dizziness, and intraoperative coughing while maintaining comparable sedation success rates. It also shortened recovery time and improved both operator and patient comfort scores. These results support remimazolam plus alfentanil as a safe, effective, and well-tolerated alternative sedation regimen in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 9","pages":"3000605251372495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe sedation protocol for flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy has long been a matter of inconclusiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of remimazolam combined with alfentanil in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and provide insights for optimizing clinical anesthesia strategies.MethodsThis study was a randomized, single-blind controlled trial. A total of 118 patients who underwent flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy were randomized into two groups (59 patients per group). Both groups received intravenous alfentanil 10 µg/kg 2 min before sedation treatment, followed by either 0.2 mg/kg remimazolam (Group R) or 2 mg/kg propofol (Group P). During the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy, the experimental drugs were administered in patients in each group as needed to maintain the depth of sedation (modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation score ≤ 3). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. The secondary outcomes included other safety outcomes and effectiveness outcomes.ResultsA total of 115 participants completed the study. Compared with Group P, the incidence of severe hypoxemia in Group R was lower (3.4% vs. 15.8%, P =0.029); the incidences of injection pain and hypotension in Group R were lower (10.3% vs. 33.3%, P =0.003); and the incidences of hypotension, dizziness, and grade of cough in Group R were lower (P <0.05). The sedation success rate and sedation success rate at an induced dose were similar between Groups R and P (P > 0.05). Compared with Group P, sedation recovery time in Group R was shorter, and the operator comfort scores and patient comfort scores in Group R were higher (P <0.05).ConclusionsRemimazolam, when combined with alfentanil, has shown excellent clinical potential in flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Compared with propofol, it significantly reduced the incidence of severe hypoxemia, injection pain, hypotension, dizziness, and intraoperative coughing while maintaining comparable sedation success rates. It also shortened recovery time and improved both operator and patient comfort scores. These results support remimazolam plus alfentanil as a safe, effective, and well-tolerated alternative sedation regimen in this setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雷马唑仑联合阿芬太尼在柔性纤维支气管镜检查中的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验。
目的柔性纤维支气管镜的镇静方案一直是一个不确定的问题。本研究的目的是评估雷马唑仑联合阿芬太尼在柔性纤维支气管镜检查中的安全性和有效性,为优化临床麻醉策略提供见解。方法采用随机、单盲对照试验。118例接受柔性纤维支气管镜检查的患者被随机分为两组(每组59例)。两组患者在镇静治疗前2分钟静脉滴注阿芬太尼10µg/kg,随后滴注雷马唑仑0.2 mg/kg (R组)或异丙酚2 mg/kg (P组)。在柔性纤维支气管镜检查过程中,各组患者根据需要给予实验药物以维持镇静深度(修改后的观察者评价警觉性/镇静评分≤3)。主要终点是低氧血症的发生率。次要结局包括其他安全性结局和有效性结局。结果共有115名参与者完成了研究。与P组相比,R组严重低氧血症发生率较低(3.4% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.029);R组注射痛、低血压发生率较低(10.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.003);R组低血压、头晕、咳嗽程度的发生率均低于对照组(P < 0.05)。R组和P组的镇静成功率及诱导剂量镇静成功率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与P组比较,R组镇静恢复时间更短,操作者舒适度评分和患者舒适度评分均高于P组(P < 0.05)。结论雷马唑仑联用阿芬太尼在柔性纤维支气管镜检查中具有良好的临床应用潜力。与异丙酚相比,它显著降低了严重低氧血症、注射疼痛、低血压、头晕和术中咳嗽的发生率,同时保持了相当的镇静成功率。它还缩短了恢复时间,提高了操作者和患者的舒适度评分。这些结果支持雷马唑仑加阿芬太尼作为一种安全、有效、耐受性良好的镇静替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信