A successful telenursing experience: Development of an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2025-07-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_580_24
Mahboubeh Nazari, Maryam Varzeshnejad, Sima Zohari-Anboohi, Houman Manoochehri, Roghayeh Esmaeili
{"title":"A successful telenursing experience: Development of an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application.","authors":"Mahboubeh Nazari, Maryam Varzeshnejad, Sima Zohari-Anboohi, Houman Manoochehri, Roghayeh Esmaeili","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_580_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telenursing is a component of telemedicine. The role and impact of telenursing in orthopedic nursing are unclear. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This study was a multi-method study. In the first and second phases of the design and implementation of the web application, the waterfall model was used with the collaboration of 127 patients with orthopedic conditions and four nurses. The third phase evaluated the web application through qualitative and quantitative approaches conducted with semi-structured interviews with 18 patients after four months of using the web application and reporting with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. A quantitative evaluation was done with the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) with the collaboration of 127 patients after four months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MARS results showed that the average score for all questions except for two questions about orientation in the performance dimension and validity in the information dimension was greater than four for all questions except for two questions about orientation in the dimension of performance and credibility in the dimension of information. Friedman's test indicated that the beauty dimension received the first rank and the information dimension received the fifth rank. Qualitative results suggested that the results of the interview were categorized into 64 codes, seven subclasses, and finally, two main classes including advantages and positive points and disadvantages and points requiring improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicated that the design, implementation, and evaluation of an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application was a successful experience in telenursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"14 ","pages":"293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12413128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_580_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telenursing is a component of telemedicine. The role and impact of telenursing in orthopedic nursing are unclear. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application.

Methods and materials: This study was a multi-method study. In the first and second phases of the design and implementation of the web application, the waterfall model was used with the collaboration of 127 patients with orthopedic conditions and four nurses. The third phase evaluated the web application through qualitative and quantitative approaches conducted with semi-structured interviews with 18 patients after four months of using the web application and reporting with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. A quantitative evaluation was done with the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) with the collaboration of 127 patients after four months.

Results: MARS results showed that the average score for all questions except for two questions about orientation in the performance dimension and validity in the information dimension was greater than four for all questions except for two questions about orientation in the dimension of performance and credibility in the dimension of information. Friedman's test indicated that the beauty dimension received the first rank and the information dimension received the fifth rank. Qualitative results suggested that the results of the interview were categorized into 64 codes, seven subclasses, and finally, two main classes including advantages and positive points and disadvantages and points requiring improvement.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicated that the design, implementation, and evaluation of an education-interaction orthopedic nursing web application was a successful experience in telenursing.

Abstract Image

成功的远程护理经验:一个教育互动骨科护理网络应用程序的开发。
背景:远程护理是远程医疗的一个组成部分。远程护理在骨科护理中的作用和影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在设计、实施及评估一个教育互动的骨科护理网站应用程式。方法与材料:本研究为多方法研究。在web应用程序的设计和实现的第一和第二阶段,与127名骨科患者和4名护士合作,使用瀑布模型。第三阶段通过对18名患者进行半结构化访谈,采用定性和定量方法对web应用程序进行评估,这些患者使用web应用程序4个月,并根据报告定性研究的综合标准(COREQ)检查表进行报告。4个月后,与127名患者合作,使用移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)进行定量评估。结果:MARS结果显示,除绩效维度中取向的两个问题外,其余问题的平均得分均大于4分,信息维度中效度的得分除绩效维度中取向的两个问题外,其余问题的平均得分均大于4分,信息维度中可信度的得分均大于4分。弗里德曼的检验表明,美维度排名第一,信息维度排名第五。定性结果表明,访谈结果分为64个代码,7个子类,最后分为优点和优点,缺点和需要改进的两个主要类。结论:本研究的结果表明,设计、实施和评估教育互动骨科护理网络应用程序是远程护理的成功经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信