Practice Pattern Variability in the Use of Pulmonary Arterial Catheters in Cardiac Surgery.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Emily J MacKay, Bo Zhang, Joseph M Beaty, Katelyn A Devine, Vikas O'Reilly-Shah, Michael R Mathis, Wilson Y Szeto, Peter W Groeneveld, John G Augoustides
{"title":"Practice Pattern Variability in the Use of Pulmonary Arterial Catheters in Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Emily J MacKay, Bo Zhang, Joseph M Beaty, Katelyn A Devine, Vikas O'Reilly-Shah, Michael R Mathis, Wilson Y Szeto, Peter W Groeneveld, John G Augoustides","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify intraoperative pulmonary arterial catheter (PAC) use during cardiac surgery and identify hospital-, anesthesiologist-, and patient-level factors associated with PAC utilization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional, observational study using generalized logistic mixed models to examine variations in PAC use.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fifty-three US academic hospitals participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) national registry PARTICIPANTS: 145,343 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention(s): </strong>Receipt of intraoperative PAC, defined by ≥60 minutes of physiologically plausible pulmonary arterial pressures.</p><p><strong>Measurements & main results: </strong>The primary outcome was PAC utilization. Mixed-effects logistic regression quantified fixed-effect predictors, and variation attributable to anesthesiologists and then to anesthesiologists nested within a hospital was characterized using median odds ratio (MOR). Of the 145,343 cardiac surgeries performed across 53 hospitals, 104,626 (72%) included PAC monitoring. PAC use varied widely across hospitals (0-98%) and across anesthesiologists (0-100%). PAC was used most frequently in heart transplants (94%) and lung transplants (87%) and least frequently in pulmonic valve procedures (30%). A patient's likelihood of receiving a PAC was influenced most strongly by hospital (MOR, 15.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.98-28.32), with substantially less variation attributable to an anesthesiologist within the same hospital (MOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative PAC monitoring is used in nearly three-quarters of cardiac surgeries at US academic centers, with hospital practice pattern the factor most closely associated with PAC utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify intraoperative pulmonary arterial catheter (PAC) use during cardiac surgery and identify hospital-, anesthesiologist-, and patient-level factors associated with PAC utilization.

Design: A cross-sectional, observational study using generalized logistic mixed models to examine variations in PAC use.

Setting: Fifty-three US academic hospitals participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) national registry PARTICIPANTS: 145,343 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022.

Intervention(s): Receipt of intraoperative PAC, defined by ≥60 minutes of physiologically plausible pulmonary arterial pressures.

Measurements & main results: The primary outcome was PAC utilization. Mixed-effects logistic regression quantified fixed-effect predictors, and variation attributable to anesthesiologists and then to anesthesiologists nested within a hospital was characterized using median odds ratio (MOR). Of the 145,343 cardiac surgeries performed across 53 hospitals, 104,626 (72%) included PAC monitoring. PAC use varied widely across hospitals (0-98%) and across anesthesiologists (0-100%). PAC was used most frequently in heart transplants (94%) and lung transplants (87%) and least frequently in pulmonic valve procedures (30%). A patient's likelihood of receiving a PAC was influenced most strongly by hospital (MOR, 15.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.98-28.32), with substantially less variation attributable to an anesthesiologist within the same hospital (MOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.81).

Conclusions: Intraoperative PAC monitoring is used in nearly three-quarters of cardiac surgeries at US academic centers, with hospital practice pattern the factor most closely associated with PAC utilization.

心脏手术中使用肺动脉导管的实践模式变化。
目的:量化心脏手术中术中肺动脉导管(PAC)的使用,并确定与PAC使用相关的医院、麻醉师和患者层面的因素。设计:一项横断面观察性研究,使用广义逻辑混合模型来检查PAC使用的变化。背景:参与多中心围手术期结局组(MPOG)国家登记的53家美国学术医院参与者:2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间接受心脏手术的145,343名成年患者。干预措施:术中接受PAC,定义为≥60分钟生理上合理的肺动脉压。测量方法及主要结果:主要观察指标为PAC利用率。混合效应逻辑回归量化了固定效应预测因子,并使用中位数优势比(MOR)对麻醉医师和医院内麻醉医师之间的差异进行了分析。在53家医院进行的145,343例心脏手术中,104,626例(72%)包括PAC监测。PAC的使用在医院(0-98%)和麻醉医师(0-100%)之间差异很大。PAC在心脏移植(94%)和肺移植(87%)中使用频率最高,在肺动脉瓣手术中使用频率最低(30%)。医院对患者接受PAC的可能性影响最大(MOR, 15.00; 95%可信区间[CI], 8.98-28.32),同一医院麻醉师对患者接受PAC的影响较小(MOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.61-1.81)。结论:美国学术中心近四分之三的心脏手术使用术中PAC监测,医院实践模式是与PAC使用最密切相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信