A Randomized Controlled Trial of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Fractional CO2 Laser Therapy for Mild and Moderate Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mingjing Lu, Weijiao Liu, Yuchan Wu, Kaixian Deng
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined with Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser Therapy for Mild and Moderate Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.","authors":"Mingjing Lu, Weijiao Liu, Yuchan Wu, Kaixian Deng","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06292-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy in women diagnosed with mild or moderate stress urinary incontinence (SUI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 69 women diagnosed with mild or moderate SUI were randomly assigned to receive fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy, PRP injections, or a combination of both treatments (n = 23 per group). Each participant underwent three treatment sessions at 30-day intervals. Outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICI-Q-SF), the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire, and a 1-h pad test at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze repeated measures across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the groups (P > 0.05). All groups demonstrated significant post-treatment improvements in ICI-Q-SF scores, I-QOL scores, and 1-h pad weights (P < 0.05). Compared to the fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser group, the PRP group showed no significant advantage, whereas the combined group exhibited significantly greater improvements at all time points: greater reductions in ICI-Q-SF scores (β = -1.09, -1.30, -1.39; all P < 0.001), higher I-QOL scores (β = 4.39, 4.61, 5.04; all P < 0.001), and greater decreases in pad weights (β = -1.22, -1.48, -1.78; all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined PRP and fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy significantly improves urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life compared to either treatment alone, offering a potentially more effective therapeutic option for women diagnosed with mild or moderate SUI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06292-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with fractional CO2 laser therapy in women diagnosed with mild or moderate stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods: In this single-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 69 women diagnosed with mild or moderate SUI were randomly assigned to receive fractional CO2 laser therapy, PRP injections, or a combination of both treatments (n = 23 per group). Each participant underwent three treatment sessions at 30-day intervals. Outcomes were assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICI-Q-SF), the Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL) questionnaire, and a 1-h pad test at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post-treatment. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze repeated measures across groups.

Results: No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed among the groups (P > 0.05). All groups demonstrated significant post-treatment improvements in ICI-Q-SF scores, I-QOL scores, and 1-h pad weights (P < 0.05). Compared to the fractional CO2 laser group, the PRP group showed no significant advantage, whereas the combined group exhibited significantly greater improvements at all time points: greater reductions in ICI-Q-SF scores (β = -1.09, -1.30, -1.39; all P < 0.001), higher I-QOL scores (β = 4.39, 4.61, 5.04; all P < 0.001), and greater decreases in pad weights (β = -1.22, -1.48, -1.78; all P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Combined PRP and fractional CO2 laser therapy significantly improves urinary incontinence symptoms and quality of life compared to either treatment alone, offering a potentially more effective therapeutic option for women diagnosed with mild or moderate SUI.

富血小板血浆联合部分CO2激光治疗女性轻中度应激性尿失禁的随机对照试验
前言和假设:本研究旨在评估富血小板血浆(PRP)联合分次CO2激光治疗诊断为轻度或中度应激性尿失禁(SUI)的女性的有效性。方法:在这项单中心、单盲、随机对照试验中,69名诊断为轻度或中度SUI的女性被随机分配接受部分CO2激光治疗、PRP注射或两种治疗的组合(每组n = 23)。每位参与者每隔30天接受三次治疗。结果评估使用国际失禁咨询问卷-短表(ICI-Q-SF),失禁生活质量(I-QOL)问卷,以及基线和治疗后1、3和6个月的1小时尿垫试验。使用广义估计方程(GEE)分析组间重复测量。结果:各组患者基线特征比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。所有组治疗后ci - q - sf评分、I-QOL评分和1小时垫重均有显著改善(P 2激光组,PRP组无显著优势,而联合组在所有时间点均有显著改善:ci - q - sf评分下降幅度更大(β = -1.09, -1.30, -1.39;结论:与单独治疗相比,联合PRP和部分CO2激光治疗可显著改善尿失禁症状和生活质量,为诊断为轻度或中度SUI的女性提供了潜在的更有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信