Problematic Use of Buspirone and Tandospirone: A Scoping Review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Philip Yu, Carl Zhou, Stanley Wong, Andrew T Olagunju
{"title":"Problematic Use of Buspirone and Tandospirone: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Philip Yu, Carl Zhou, Stanley Wong, Andrew T Olagunju","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Azapirone-class drugs are partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists commonly used to treat anxiety disorders. Prior experimental studies have so far demonstrated that these drugs have low potential for dependence and problematic use and are considered safe treatment options compared with benzodiazepines. However, recent evidence suggesting the contrary raises concerns about their safety. This review examines current evidence on problematic azapirone use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Major databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE, were searched to identify eligible papers. Additional searches were conducted to supplement. Article selection and data extraction were completed by at least 2 independent reviewers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen reports made up of clinical studies (n = 9) and case reports (n = 4) were included. All abuse liability studies comparing azapirones (buspirone and tandospirone), benzodiazepines, and placebo reported no association of buspirone and tandospirone with key features of problematic use. Conversely, all case reports (n = 4) described problematic use, involving patients with a history of incarceration or substance use disorder (SUD) who insufflated buspirone to achieve a sedative effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight a discrepancy in the primary literature. Specifically, experimental studies conclude that so far, buspirone and tandospirone have a low potential for problematic use. However, more recent case reports document instances of nonprescribed buspirone misuse, particularly among individuals with a history of incarceration or SUD, possibly stemming from a complex interplay of biopsychosocial-behavioral rather than purely pharmacological factors. Further research is needed to guide strategies for preventing problematic azapirone use while ensuring effective anxiety treatment in high-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Azapirone-class drugs are partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists commonly used to treat anxiety disorders. Prior experimental studies have so far demonstrated that these drugs have low potential for dependence and problematic use and are considered safe treatment options compared with benzodiazepines. However, recent evidence suggesting the contrary raises concerns about their safety. This review examines current evidence on problematic azapirone use.

Methods: This study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Major databases, including MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE, were searched to identify eligible papers. Additional searches were conducted to supplement. Article selection and data extraction were completed by at least 2 independent reviewers.

Results: Thirteen reports made up of clinical studies (n = 9) and case reports (n = 4) were included. All abuse liability studies comparing azapirones (buspirone and tandospirone), benzodiazepines, and placebo reported no association of buspirone and tandospirone with key features of problematic use. Conversely, all case reports (n = 4) described problematic use, involving patients with a history of incarceration or substance use disorder (SUD) who insufflated buspirone to achieve a sedative effect.

Conclusions: Findings highlight a discrepancy in the primary literature. Specifically, experimental studies conclude that so far, buspirone and tandospirone have a low potential for problematic use. However, more recent case reports document instances of nonprescribed buspirone misuse, particularly among individuals with a history of incarceration or SUD, possibly stemming from a complex interplay of biopsychosocial-behavioral rather than purely pharmacological factors. Further research is needed to guide strategies for preventing problematic azapirone use while ensuring effective anxiety treatment in high-risk populations.

丁螺环酮和坦多螺环酮的问题使用:范围审查。
目的:阿扎哌酮类药物是部分5-HT1A受体激动剂,常用于治疗焦虑症。到目前为止,先前的实验研究表明,与苯二氮卓类药物相比,这些药物的依赖性和使用问题的可能性很小,被认为是安全的治疗选择。然而,最近的证据表明,相反的情况引起了人们对其安全性的担忧。本综述审查了目前有关阿萨匹龙使用问题的证据。方法:本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南的首选报告项目进行。检索主要数据库,包括MEDLINE/PubMed、PsycInfo和EMBASE,以确定符合条件的论文。进行了额外的搜索以补充。文章选择和数据提取由至少2名独立审稿人完成。结果:纳入13篇临床研究报告(n = 9)和病例报告(n = 4)。所有比较阿扎吡酮类药物(丁螺环酮和坦多螺酮)、苯二氮卓类药物和安慰剂的滥用责任研究均未发现丁螺环酮和坦多螺酮与用药问题的关键特征之间存在关联。相反,所有病例报告(n = 4)都描述了有问题的使用,包括有监禁史或物质使用障碍(SUD)的患者,他们为达到镇静效果而注入丁螺环酮。结论:研究结果强调了原始文献中的差异。具体来说,实验研究得出结论,到目前为止,丁螺环酮和坦多螺环酮的潜在使用问题很小。然而,最近的病例报告记录了非处方丁螺环酮滥用的实例,特别是在有监禁史或SUD的个体中,可能源于生物心理社会行为的复杂相互作用,而不是纯粹的药物因素。需要进一步的研究来指导预防问题阿扎吡酮使用的策略,同时确保对高危人群进行有效的焦虑治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信