The Role of Worry and Affectivity on Physiological Responses To an Acute Stressor.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
James A Meurs, Christopher Stride, Ana Maria Rossi, Pamela L Perrewé
{"title":"The Role of Worry and Affectivity on Physiological Responses To an Acute Stressor.","authors":"James A Meurs, Christopher Stride, Ana Maria Rossi, Pamela L Perrewé","doi":"10.1007/s10484-025-09733-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The explanation for how acutely stressful experiences could result in proximal health outcomes has been lacking in occupational health research. Although scholars have argued that individual personality and affect could worsen health behaviors, we believe that these qualities also could intensify the experience of acute stressors, potentially explaining why acutely stress encounters result in poor health outcomes for some people, but not others. Our study examines three individual differences - worry, negative affect, and positive affect - that are relevant to differential stress anticipation, reactivity, and recovery. Study participants, who were full-time professional or managerial employees, attended a clinic where we gathered data on their trait worry, and state negative and positive affect. Then, they took part in an experimental exercise that should reflect stressful experiences at work (i.e., cognitive stressor with social pressure). The clinician collected measures of participant facial muscle tension, skin temperature, blood pressure, respiratory breathing, and heart rate, before, during, and after the stressful exercise. Results suggest that only positive affect magnified stress during the anticipation of the experiment, both worry and negative affect intensified the negative physiological effects of the stressor in two of the three experimental stages, and only negative affect delayed physiological recovery and relaxation. Our findings augment our understanding of how individual differences affect physiological responses to acute stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09733-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The explanation for how acutely stressful experiences could result in proximal health outcomes has been lacking in occupational health research. Although scholars have argued that individual personality and affect could worsen health behaviors, we believe that these qualities also could intensify the experience of acute stressors, potentially explaining why acutely stress encounters result in poor health outcomes for some people, but not others. Our study examines three individual differences - worry, negative affect, and positive affect - that are relevant to differential stress anticipation, reactivity, and recovery. Study participants, who were full-time professional or managerial employees, attended a clinic where we gathered data on their trait worry, and state negative and positive affect. Then, they took part in an experimental exercise that should reflect stressful experiences at work (i.e., cognitive stressor with social pressure). The clinician collected measures of participant facial muscle tension, skin temperature, blood pressure, respiratory breathing, and heart rate, before, during, and after the stressful exercise. Results suggest that only positive affect magnified stress during the anticipation of the experiment, both worry and negative affect intensified the negative physiological effects of the stressor in two of the three experimental stages, and only negative affect delayed physiological recovery and relaxation. Our findings augment our understanding of how individual differences affect physiological responses to acute stress.

焦虑和情感在急性应激源生理反应中的作用。
在职业健康研究中,缺乏对急性压力经历如何导致近端健康结果的解释。虽然学者们认为,个人的个性和情感会使健康行为恶化,但我们相信,这些品质也会加剧急性压力源的体验,这可能解释了为什么急性压力会导致一些人的健康状况不佳,而其他人却不会。我们的研究考察了三种个体差异——担忧、消极影响和积极影响——它们与不同的压力预期、反应性和恢复有关。研究参与者是全职专业人员或管理人员,他们去了一家诊所,在那里我们收集了他们特质担忧的数据,以及消极和积极影响的状态。然后,他们参加了一个实验练习,该练习应该反映工作中的压力经历(即,认知压力源与社会压力)。临床医生收集了参与者在紧张运动之前、期间和之后的面部肌肉张力、皮肤温度、血压、呼吸呼吸和心率的测量。结果表明,在实验前两个阶段,只有积极情绪会放大应激,焦虑和消极情绪会加剧应激源的负性生理效应,只有消极情绪会延迟生理恢复和放松。我们的发现增强了我们对个体差异如何影响急性应激生理反应的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信