Effect of the interaction between Lactobacillus casei and hydrolyzed yeast on the sexual competitiveness, survival, and fecundity of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae).

IF 3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Damara Olea, Linnet Roque-Romero, Karina Guillén-Navarro, Pablo Liedo
{"title":"Effect of the interaction between Lactobacillus casei and hydrolyzed yeast on the sexual competitiveness, survival, and fecundity of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae).","authors":"Damara Olea, Linnet Roque-Romero, Karina Guillén-Navarro, Pablo Liedo","doi":"10.1111/1744-7917.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enriching the diets of sterile fruit flies with bacterial species prior to their release has been shown to improve their survival and sexual competitiveness. However, most of the bacteria associated with fruit flies are enterobacteria, and some species have been classified as opportunistic pathogens. On the other hand, in diets that include hydrolyzed yeast, the effect of bacteria has been counterproductive, which could be due to the protein content in the diet being too high. Therefore, our aim here was to evaluate the effect of Lactobacillus casei, interacting with different contents of hydrolyzed yeast in the diet, on the performance of Anastrepha obliqua adults. In sexual competitiveness tests, the highest proportion of matings was achieved by males fed on a standard diet (3 : 1 sugar : yeast) plus L. casei. However, the differences with the 3 : 1 sugar : yeast diet was not significant. In survival tests, the 3 : 1 diet, without L. casei, showed the highest survival. The group fed with sugar plus L. casei showed the lowest survival. Females fed the 3 : 1 diet showed the highest fecundity, followed by those fed the 3 : 1 diet plus L. casei. Enriching the standard 3 : 1 diet with L. casei did not lead to significant improvements in male sexual performance, survival of either sex, or fecundity, compared to flies fed the standard diet alone. However, given that Lactobacillus is harmless to both humans and flies, further research into its potential application in the sterile insect technique (SIT) is recommended. Future studies should explore alternative formulations, varying concentrations, and other species within the Lactobacillus genus that may exert more pronounced effects on the biological traits of this fruit fly.</p>","PeriodicalId":13618,"journal":{"name":"Insect Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.70162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enriching the diets of sterile fruit flies with bacterial species prior to their release has been shown to improve their survival and sexual competitiveness. However, most of the bacteria associated with fruit flies are enterobacteria, and some species have been classified as opportunistic pathogens. On the other hand, in diets that include hydrolyzed yeast, the effect of bacteria has been counterproductive, which could be due to the protein content in the diet being too high. Therefore, our aim here was to evaluate the effect of Lactobacillus casei, interacting with different contents of hydrolyzed yeast in the diet, on the performance of Anastrepha obliqua adults. In sexual competitiveness tests, the highest proportion of matings was achieved by males fed on a standard diet (3 : 1 sugar : yeast) plus L. casei. However, the differences with the 3 : 1 sugar : yeast diet was not significant. In survival tests, the 3 : 1 diet, without L. casei, showed the highest survival. The group fed with sugar plus L. casei showed the lowest survival. Females fed the 3 : 1 diet showed the highest fecundity, followed by those fed the 3 : 1 diet plus L. casei. Enriching the standard 3 : 1 diet with L. casei did not lead to significant improvements in male sexual performance, survival of either sex, or fecundity, compared to flies fed the standard diet alone. However, given that Lactobacillus is harmless to both humans and flies, further research into its potential application in the sterile insect technique (SIT) is recommended. Future studies should explore alternative formulations, varying concentrations, and other species within the Lactobacillus genus that may exert more pronounced effects on the biological traits of this fruit fly.

干酪乳杆菌与水解酵母菌互作对斜斑绢蝇(双翅目:绢蝇科)性竞争、存活和繁殖力的影响。
在不育果蝇被释放之前,用细菌丰富它们的饮食已被证明可以提高它们的存活率和性竞争力。然而,大多数与果蝇相关的细菌是肠杆菌,一些物种被归类为机会致病菌。另一方面,在含有水解酵母菌的饮食中,细菌的作用适得其反,这可能是由于饮食中的蛋白质含量过高。因此,我们在这里的目的是评估干酪乳杆菌与饲料中不同水解酵母含量的相互作用对斜Anastrepha成虫生产性能的影响。在性竞争测试中,以标准饮食(3:1糖:酵母)加干酪乳杆菌喂养的雄性获得的交配比例最高。然而,与3:1糖:酵母日粮的差异不显著。在生存试验中,不含干酪乳杆菌的3:1饮食显示出最高的存活率。糖加干酪乳杆菌组存活率最低。饲喂3∶1日粮的雌虫繁殖力最高,饲喂3∶1日粮加干酪乳杆菌的次之。与单独喂食标准饮食的果蝇相比,在标准的3:1饮食中添加干酪乳杆菌并没有显著提高雄性的性表现、雌雄的存活率或繁殖力。然而,鉴于乳酸菌对人类和苍蝇无害,建议进一步研究其在昆虫不育技术(SIT)中的潜在应用。未来的研究应该探索不同浓度的替代配方,以及乳杆菌属中的其他物种,这些物种可能对这种果蝇的生物学性状产生更显著的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insect Science
Insect Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1379
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Insect Science is an English-language journal, which publishes original research articles dealing with all fields of research in into insects and other terrestrial arthropods. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: ecology, behavior, biogeography, physiology, biochemistry, sociobiology, phylogeny, pest management, and exotic incursions. The emphasis of the journal is on the adaptation and evolutionary biology of insects from the molecular to the ecosystem level. Reviews, mini reviews and letters to the editor, book reviews, and information about academic activities of the society are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信