The Anti-Social US Health-Care System: A Case for Socially Oriented Reform.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Aimee Milliken, Olaf Dammann
{"title":"The Anti-Social US Health-Care System: A Case for Socially Oriented Reform.","authors":"Aimee Milliken, Olaf Dammann","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2025.a968850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the US, there has historically been strong public opposition to health-care reform involving \"socialized medicine.\" This resistance, at least in part, is influenced by a deeply entrenched individualistic ethos. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that the current US health-care system is broken, and that existing systems around the world achieve better outcomes while costing less. This article argues that learning from these systems should be possible. The authors describe roadblocks to health-care reform in the US, including social fragmentation, resistance to global models, and the prioritization of profit over well-being; argue that a value system that prioritizes the individual over the collective precludes successful health-care reform; highlight shortcomings of the US model; and propose that reimagining health care through a socially oriented lens, emphasizing collective and reciprocal moral obligations, may offer a path forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":"68 3","pages":"444-452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a968850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the US, there has historically been strong public opposition to health-care reform involving "socialized medicine." This resistance, at least in part, is influenced by a deeply entrenched individualistic ethos. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that the current US health-care system is broken, and that existing systems around the world achieve better outcomes while costing less. This article argues that learning from these systems should be possible. The authors describe roadblocks to health-care reform in the US, including social fragmentation, resistance to global models, and the prioritization of profit over well-being; argue that a value system that prioritizes the individual over the collective precludes successful health-care reform; highlight shortcomings of the US model; and propose that reimagining health care through a socially oriented lens, emphasizing collective and reciprocal moral obligations, may offer a path forward.

反社会的美国医疗保健制度:以社会为导向的改革案例。
在美国,公众历来强烈反对涉及“社会化医疗”的医疗改革。这种抵制,至少在一定程度上,受到根深蒂固的个人主义精神的影响。然而,越来越明显的是,美国目前的医疗体系已经崩溃,而世界各地的现有体系在成本更低的情况下取得了更好的效果。本文认为,从这些系统中学习应该是可能的。作者描述了美国医疗改革的障碍,包括社会分裂,对全球模式的抵制,以及将利润置于福祉之上;认为将个人利益置于集体利益之上的价值体系会阻碍医疗改革的成功;突出美国模式的缺点;并提出通过面向社会的视角重新构想医疗保健,强调集体和互惠的道德义务,可能会提供一条前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信