Leah Quinlivan, Jodie Westhead, Jane Graney, Fanyi Su, Sarah Steeg, Emma Nielsen, Eloise Curtis, Ellie Wildbore, Faraz Mughal, Rachel Elliott, Roger T Webb, Nav Kapur
{"title":"Umbrella review of psychosocial and ward-based interventions to reduce self-harm and suicide risks in in-patient mental health settings.","authors":"Leah Quinlivan, Jodie Westhead, Jane Graney, Fanyi Su, Sarah Steeg, Emma Nielsen, Eloise Curtis, Ellie Wildbore, Faraz Mughal, Rachel Elliott, Roger T Webb, Nav Kapur","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding what psychosocial interventions can reduce self-harm and suicide within in-patient mental health settings can be challenging, due to clinical demands and the large volume of published reviews.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarise evidence from systematic reviews on psychosocial and ward-level interventions (excluding environmental modifications) for self-harm and suicide that may enhance patient safety in in-patient mental health settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We systematically searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and CDSR (2013-2023) for systematic reviews on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions that included in-patient data. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, primary study overlap via an evidence matrix, and evidence strength evaluated (GRADE algorithm). Findings were narratively synthesised, with input from experts-by-experience throughout (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023442639).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen systematic reviews (seven meta-analyses, six narrative), comprising over 160 000 participants, were identified. Based on quantitative reviews, cognitive-behavioural therapy reduces repeat self-harm by follow-up, and dialectical behaviour therapy decreases the frequency of self-harm. Narrative review evidence suggested that post-discharge follow-up, as well as system and ward-based interventions (e.g. staff training) may reduce suicide and/or self-harm. However, review quality varied, patient involvement was lacking and methodological quality of trials informing reviews was predominately low. Overlap was slight (covered area 12.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effectiveness of interventions to prevent self-harm and suicide in in-patient settings remains uncertain due to variable quality reviews, evidence gaps, poor methodological quality of primary studies and a lack of pragmatic trials and co-production. There is an urgent need for better, co-designed research within in-patient mental health settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e196"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10811","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Understanding what psychosocial interventions can reduce self-harm and suicide within in-patient mental health settings can be challenging, due to clinical demands and the large volume of published reviews.
Aims: To summarise evidence from systematic reviews on psychosocial and ward-level interventions (excluding environmental modifications) for self-harm and suicide that may enhance patient safety in in-patient mental health settings.
Method: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and CDSR (2013-2023) for systematic reviews on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions that included in-patient data. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, primary study overlap via an evidence matrix, and evidence strength evaluated (GRADE algorithm). Findings were narratively synthesised, with input from experts-by-experience throughout (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023442639).
Results: Thirteen systematic reviews (seven meta-analyses, six narrative), comprising over 160 000 participants, were identified. Based on quantitative reviews, cognitive-behavioural therapy reduces repeat self-harm by follow-up, and dialectical behaviour therapy decreases the frequency of self-harm. Narrative review evidence suggested that post-discharge follow-up, as well as system and ward-based interventions (e.g. staff training) may reduce suicide and/or self-harm. However, review quality varied, patient involvement was lacking and methodological quality of trials informing reviews was predominately low. Overlap was slight (covered area 12.4%).
Conclusions: The effectiveness of interventions to prevent self-harm and suicide in in-patient settings remains uncertain due to variable quality reviews, evidence gaps, poor methodological quality of primary studies and a lack of pragmatic trials and co-production. There is an urgent need for better, co-designed research within in-patient mental health settings.
期刊介绍:
Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.