European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on embracing a context-of-use-driven scientific validation for chromatographic assays in the light of ICH M10.
Philip Timmerman, Stuart McDougall, Neil Adcock, Cecilia Arfvidsson, Matthew Barfield, Stefan Blech, Kyra J Cowan, Luca Ferrari, Alessandro Greco, Michaela Golob, Lee Goodwin, Richard Hughes, Tsvetelina Ivanova, Anna Laurén, Robert Nelson, Sonja Neitzel, Tom Verhaeghe, Nico van de Merbel, Mike Wright, Stephen White
{"title":"European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on embracing a context-of-use-driven scientific validation for chromatographic assays in the light of ICH M10.","authors":"Philip Timmerman, Stuart McDougall, Neil Adcock, Cecilia Arfvidsson, Matthew Barfield, Stefan Blech, Kyra J Cowan, Luca Ferrari, Alessandro Greco, Michaela Golob, Lee Goodwin, Richard Hughes, Tsvetelina Ivanova, Anna Laurén, Robert Nelson, Sonja Neitzel, Tom Verhaeghe, Nico van de Merbel, Mike Wright, Stephen White","doi":"10.1080/17576180.2025.2555774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use M10 guideline provides a global framework for bioanalytical method validation in studies intended for regulatory submission. While its structure ensures consistency and data reliability, the guideline also acknowledges that not all studies require the same level of validation. This paper examines where full compliance is essential and where scientific judgment allows for leaner, context-driven validation, such as in early-stage development, for additional matrices, metabolites, nonstandard biological matrices or studies intended for internal decision-making. Drawing on recent recommendations from the European Bioanalysis Forum, we introduce a decision-making flowchart and parameter table to support consistent application of a Context-of-Use approach to validation. These tools help guide when flexibility is appropriate while ensuring transparency and robustness in the data. The paper advocates continued dialogue both with end users of the data and the regulatory authorities to support a modernized, risk-based validation framework that remains aligned with patient needs and scientific integrity. We believe the recommendations in this paper are fully in alignment with the intent and core principles of ICH M10, while encouraging their application in a way that remains scientifically driven and proportionate to the purpose of the assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":8797,"journal":{"name":"Bioanalysis","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2025.2555774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use M10 guideline provides a global framework for bioanalytical method validation in studies intended for regulatory submission. While its structure ensures consistency and data reliability, the guideline also acknowledges that not all studies require the same level of validation. This paper examines where full compliance is essential and where scientific judgment allows for leaner, context-driven validation, such as in early-stage development, for additional matrices, metabolites, nonstandard biological matrices or studies intended for internal decision-making. Drawing on recent recommendations from the European Bioanalysis Forum, we introduce a decision-making flowchart and parameter table to support consistent application of a Context-of-Use approach to validation. These tools help guide when flexibility is appropriate while ensuring transparency and robustness in the data. The paper advocates continued dialogue both with end users of the data and the regulatory authorities to support a modernized, risk-based validation framework that remains aligned with patient needs and scientific integrity. We believe the recommendations in this paper are fully in alignment with the intent and core principles of ICH M10, while encouraging their application in a way that remains scientifically driven and proportionate to the purpose of the assay.
BioanalysisBIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Reliable data obtained from selective, sensitive and reproducible analysis of xenobiotics and biotics in biological samples is a fundamental and crucial part of every successful drug development program. The same principles can also apply to many other areas of research such as forensic science, toxicology and sports doping testing.
The bioanalytical field incorporates sophisticated techniques linking sample preparation and advanced separations with MS and NMR detection systems, automation and robotics. Standards set by regulatory bodies regarding method development and validation increasingly define the boundaries between speed and quality.
Bioanalysis is a progressive discipline for which the future holds many exciting opportunities to further reduce sample volumes, analysis cost and environmental impact, as well as to improve sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, efficiency, assay throughput, data quality, data handling and processing.
The journal Bioanalysis focuses on the techniques and methods used for the detection or quantitative study of analytes in human or animal biological samples. Bioanalysis encourages the submission of articles describing forward-looking applications, including biosensors, microfluidics, miniaturized analytical devices, and new hyphenated and multi-dimensional techniques.
Bioanalysis delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for the modern bioanalyst.