Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Heemin Chae , Hee-Ju Ji , Hyunjung Moon , Yeongeun Lee , Youn-Jung Son
{"title":"Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis","authors":"Heemin Chae ,&nbsp;Hee-Ju Ji ,&nbsp;Hyunjung Moon ,&nbsp;Yeongeun Lee ,&nbsp;Youn-Jung Son","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The lack of a clear and unified definition of shared decision-making (SDM) may hinder its effective application in oncology care. This study aims to clarify the concept of SDM specifically in the context of early-stage breast cancer treatment through an evolutionary concept analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for articles published from January 2015 to December 2024. Using keywords “shared decision-making” and “breast cancer,” relevant studies were identified, and key attributes of SDM were extracted and synthesized. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SDM for early-stage breast cancer treatment was characterized by 10 attributes spanning three levels: 1) Patient perspective: involvement in decision-making, values and preferences regarding treatment options, and deliberative thinking to achieve choice certainty; 2) Healthcare professional perspective: provision of individualized information, psychological support, consultation focused on patients’ best interests, collaborative partnerships with patients, coordinated care delivery, and promotion of person-centered, informed choices; 3) Healthcare system level: fostering a patient-centered healthcare culture.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings provide a comprehensive conceptual framework to guide the development of detailed SDM guidelines tailored for early-stage breast cancer patients. Enhanced understanding of SDM can support nurses and healthcare professionals in facilitating collaborative and optimal decision-making processes within oncology care. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for developing measurement tools and disease-specific interventions to advance SDM implementation in early-stage breast cancer treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42024587218)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100775"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525001234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The lack of a clear and unified definition of shared decision-making (SDM) may hinder its effective application in oncology care. This study aims to clarify the concept of SDM specifically in the context of early-stage breast cancer treatment through an evolutionary concept analysis.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for articles published from January 2015 to December 2024. Using keywords “shared decision-making” and “breast cancer,” relevant studies were identified, and key attributes of SDM were extracted and synthesized. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria.

Results

SDM for early-stage breast cancer treatment was characterized by 10 attributes spanning three levels: 1) Patient perspective: involvement in decision-making, values and preferences regarding treatment options, and deliberative thinking to achieve choice certainty; 2) Healthcare professional perspective: provision of individualized information, psychological support, consultation focused on patients’ best interests, collaborative partnerships with patients, coordinated care delivery, and promotion of person-centered, informed choices; 3) Healthcare system level: fostering a patient-centered healthcare culture.

Conclusions

These findings provide a comprehensive conceptual framework to guide the development of detailed SDM guidelines tailored for early-stage breast cancer patients. Enhanced understanding of SDM can support nurses and healthcare professionals in facilitating collaborative and optimal decision-making processes within oncology care. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for developing measurement tools and disease-specific interventions to advance SDM implementation in early-stage breast cancer treatment.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO (CRD42024587218)

Abstract Image

早期乳腺癌治疗的共同决策:一个进化概念分析。
目的:共享决策(shared decision-making, SDM)缺乏清晰统一的定义,可能会阻碍其在肿瘤护理中的有效应用。本研究旨在通过进化概念分析,明确SDM在早期乳腺癌治疗背景下的具体概念。方法:系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库,检索2015年1月至2024年12月发表的文章。以“共享决策”和“乳腺癌”为关键词,识别相关研究,提取合成SDM的关键属性。16项研究符合纳入标准。结果:早期乳腺癌治疗的SDM具有3个层次的10个属性特征:1)患者视角:参与决策、对治疗方案的价值观和偏好、慎重思考以实现选择确定性;2)医疗专业视角:提供个性化信息、心理支持、以患者最佳利益为中心的咨询、与患者的合作伙伴关系、协调的护理服务,以及促进以人为本的知情选择;3)医疗体系层面:培育以患者为中心的医疗文化。结论:这些发现为指导制定针对早期乳腺癌患者的详细SDM指南提供了一个全面的概念框架。加强对SDM的理解可以支持护士和医疗保健专业人员促进肿瘤护理中的协作和最佳决策过程。此外,本研究为开发测量工具和疾病特异性干预措施奠定了基础,以推进SDM在早期乳腺癌治疗中的实施。系统评价注册:PROSPERO (CRD42024587218)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书