Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in Individuals with Chronic Stroke.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Kiersten M McCartney, Pierce Boyne, Ryan Pohlig, Susanne M Morton, Darcy S Reisman
{"title":"Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in Individuals with Chronic Stroke.","authors":"Kiersten M McCartney, Pierce Boyne, Ryan Pohlig, Susanne M Morton, Darcy S Reisman","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether exercise intensity, quantified as heart rate or training speed, predicts walking outcomes in people with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis from a larger randomized controlled trial (\"Promoting Recovery Optimization of Walking Activity in Stroke\"; NIH1R01HD086362).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four outpatient rehabilitation clinics.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants with chronic stroke with a walking speed of 0.3-1.0 m/s and step activity of <8000 steps per day. This analysis included participants (N=169; age, 63.1±12.5, 46% women) with complete baseline and postintervention data.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants were randomized into (1) fast-walking training or (2) fast-walking training and step-activity monitoring behavioral group. Of importance, participants received up to 36 sessions of 30-minute high-intensity treadmill walking training across 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were a baseline-to-postintervention change in 6-minute walk test distance and fastest walking speed. Exercise intensity was quantified as either a percentage of heart rate reserve or self-selected walking speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two separate multiple linear regressions with robust errors analyzed the relationship of exercise intensity metrics (% heart rate, training speed) on baseline-to-postintervention changes in 2 walking capacity outcomes (6-minute walk test, fastest walking speed) after accounting for covariates. Training speed was a significant predictor of both a change in 6-minute walk test distance (b=0.359; 95% CI, 0.108-0.610; P=.005) and fastest walking speed (b=0.001; 95% CI, 0.001-0.002; P=.003). Heart rate was not a significant predictor of either outcome (both P>.373).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training speed significantly predicts changes in walking capacity outcomes in people with chronic stroke following a fast-walking treadmill intervention. This suggests rehabilitation clinicians may use training speed as the metric of exercise intensity when prescribing walking interventions to people with chronic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether exercise intensity, quantified as heart rate or training speed, predicts walking outcomes in people with chronic stroke.

Design: This is a secondary analysis from a larger randomized controlled trial ("Promoting Recovery Optimization of Walking Activity in Stroke"; NIH1R01HD086362).

Setting: Four outpatient rehabilitation clinics.

Participants: Participants with chronic stroke with a walking speed of 0.3-1.0 m/s and step activity of <8000 steps per day. This analysis included participants (N=169; age, 63.1±12.5, 46% women) with complete baseline and postintervention data.

Interventions: Participants were randomized into (1) fast-walking training or (2) fast-walking training and step-activity monitoring behavioral group. Of importance, participants received up to 36 sessions of 30-minute high-intensity treadmill walking training across 12 weeks.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were a baseline-to-postintervention change in 6-minute walk test distance and fastest walking speed. Exercise intensity was quantified as either a percentage of heart rate reserve or self-selected walking speed.

Results: Two separate multiple linear regressions with robust errors analyzed the relationship of exercise intensity metrics (% heart rate, training speed) on baseline-to-postintervention changes in 2 walking capacity outcomes (6-minute walk test, fastest walking speed) after accounting for covariates. Training speed was a significant predictor of both a change in 6-minute walk test distance (b=0.359; 95% CI, 0.108-0.610; P=.005) and fastest walking speed (b=0.001; 95% CI, 0.001-0.002; P=.003). Heart rate was not a significant predictor of either outcome (both P>.373).

Conclusions: Training speed significantly predicts changes in walking capacity outcomes in people with chronic stroke following a fast-walking treadmill intervention. This suggests rehabilitation clinicians may use training speed as the metric of exercise intensity when prescribing walking interventions to people with chronic stroke.

量化运动强度预测慢性中风患者步行能力的变化。
目的:研究运动强度(量化为心率或训练速度)是否能预测慢性中风患者的步行结果。设计:这是一项大型随机临床试验(“PROWALKS”;NIH1R01HD086362)的二次分析。设置:四、门诊康复诊所。研究对象:慢性脑卒中患者,步行速度0.3 ~ 1.0m/s,步速活动干预:随机分为(1)快走训练组和(2)快走训练+步速活动监测组。重要的是,参与者在12周内接受了多达36次30分钟的高强度跑步机步行训练。主要结果测量:主要结果是干预前后6分钟步行测试距离和最快步行速度的变化。运动强度被量化为心率储备的百分比或自行选择的步行速度。结果:考虑协变量后,两个独立的多元线性回归分析了运动强度指标(%心率、训练速度)与干预前后两个步行能力结果(6分钟步行测试、最快步行速度)变化的关系。训练速度是6分钟步行测试距离变化的显著预测因子(b = 0.359 (95% CI [0.108 - 0.610]), p = 0.005)和最快步行速度(b = 0.001 (95% CI [0.001-0.002]), p = 0.003)。心率不是两种结果的显著预测因子(p均为0.373)。结论:训练速度显著预测慢性中风患者在快走跑步机干预后行走能力的变化。这表明,康复临床医生在给慢性中风患者开步行干预处方时,可能会使用训练速度作为运动强度的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信