Associations between psychotic experience dimensions and polygenic liability to schizophrenia in a longitudinal birth cohort.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Alastair G Cardno, Hein Heuvelman, Sophie E Legge, James T R Walters, Stanley Zammit, Hannah J Jones
{"title":"Associations between psychotic experience dimensions and polygenic liability to schizophrenia in a longitudinal birth cohort.","authors":"Alastair G Cardno, Hein Heuvelman, Sophie E Legge, James T R Walters, Stanley Zammit, Hannah J Jones","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some psychotic experiences in the general population show associations with higher schizophrenia and other mental health-related polygenic risk scores (PRSs), but studies have not usually included interviewer-rated positive, negative and disorganised dimensions, which show distinct associations in clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate associations of these psychotic experience dimensions primarily with schizophrenia PRS and, secondarily, with other relevant PRSs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort participants were assessed for positive, negative and disorganised psychotic experience dimensions from interviews, and for self-rated negative symptoms, at 24 years of age. Regression models were used to investigate associations between psychotic experience dimensions and schizophrenia and other PRSs (2500+ participants for each analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Against expectation, none of the positive, negative or disorganised dimensions was associated with schizophrenia PRS. In secondary analysis, self-rated negative symptoms were associated with higher depression (<i>β</i> = 0.10 [95% CI 0.06-0.15]), anxiety (<i>β</i> = 0.09 [95% CI 0.04-0.13]), neuroticism (<i>β</i> = 0.11 [95% CI 0.06-0.15]) and autism (<i>β</i> = 0.09 [95% CI 0.05-0.13]) PRSs (all <i>P</i> < 0.001); and first-rank delusions were nominally associated with higher schizophrenia PRS (odds ratio 7.35 [95% CI 2.10-25.77], <i>P</i> = 0.002), although these experiences/symptoms were rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive, negative and disorganised psychotic experiences are probably not strongly associated with polygenic liability to schizophrenia in this general population cohort of young adults. Self-rated negative symptoms may indicate social withdrawal/low motivation due to higher polygenic liability to affective disorders or autism, and first-rank delusions may indicate higher polygenic liability to schizophrenia, but these findings require independent confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some psychotic experiences in the general population show associations with higher schizophrenia and other mental health-related polygenic risk scores (PRSs), but studies have not usually included interviewer-rated positive, negative and disorganised dimensions, which show distinct associations in clinical samples.

Aims: To investigate associations of these psychotic experience dimensions primarily with schizophrenia PRS and, secondarily, with other relevant PRSs.

Method: Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) birth cohort participants were assessed for positive, negative and disorganised psychotic experience dimensions from interviews, and for self-rated negative symptoms, at 24 years of age. Regression models were used to investigate associations between psychotic experience dimensions and schizophrenia and other PRSs (2500+ participants for each analysis).

Results: Against expectation, none of the positive, negative or disorganised dimensions was associated with schizophrenia PRS. In secondary analysis, self-rated negative symptoms were associated with higher depression (β = 0.10 [95% CI 0.06-0.15]), anxiety (β = 0.09 [95% CI 0.04-0.13]), neuroticism (β = 0.11 [95% CI 0.06-0.15]) and autism (β = 0.09 [95% CI 0.05-0.13]) PRSs (all P < 0.001); and first-rank delusions were nominally associated with higher schizophrenia PRS (odds ratio 7.35 [95% CI 2.10-25.77], P = 0.002), although these experiences/symptoms were rare.

Conclusions: Positive, negative and disorganised psychotic experiences are probably not strongly associated with polygenic liability to schizophrenia in this general population cohort of young adults. Self-rated negative symptoms may indicate social withdrawal/low motivation due to higher polygenic liability to affective disorders or autism, and first-rank delusions may indicate higher polygenic liability to schizophrenia, but these findings require independent confirmation.

纵向出生队列中精神病经历维度与精神分裂症多基因易感性之间的关系。
背景:一般人群中的一些精神病经历与较高的精神分裂症和其他与精神健康相关的多基因风险评分(PRSs)有关,但研究通常未包括访谈者评定的阳性、阴性和无组织维度,这些维度在临床样本中显示出明显的相关性。目的:研究这些精神病经历维度主要与精神分裂症PRS的关系,其次与其他相关PRS的关系。方法:在24岁时,对雅芳父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC)出生队列参与者进行访谈中阳性、阴性和无组织精神病体验维度的评估,并对自评阴性症状进行评估。回归模型用于调查精神病经验维度与精神分裂症和其他PRSs之间的关系(每次分析2500+参与者)。结果:出乎意料的是,积极、消极或混乱的维度都与精神分裂症PRS无关。在二次分析中,自评阴性症状与较高的抑郁(β = 0.10 [95% CI 0.06-0.15])、焦虑(β = 0.09 [95% CI 0.04-0.13])、神经质(β = 0.11 [95% CI 0.06-0.15])和自闭症(β = 0.09 [95% CI 0.05-0.13]) PRSs相关(均P < 0.001);名义上,一级妄想与较高的精神分裂症PRS相关(优势比7.35 [95% CI 2.10-25.77], P = 0.002),尽管这些经历/症状很少见。结论:在这一普通人群中,积极、消极和无组织的精神病经历可能与精神分裂症的多基因易感性没有很强的相关性。自评阴性症状可能表明由于情感障碍或自闭症的高多基因易感性而导致的社交退缩/低动机,而一级妄想可能表明精神分裂症的高多基因易感性,但这些发现需要独立证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信