{"title":"Benchmarking Ploidy Estimation Methods for Bulk and Single-Cell Whole Genome Sequencing.","authors":"Yawei Song, Zilv Mei, Qijie Zheng, Qingqing Yuan, Yu Liang, Jiaqi Gao, Lang Zhou, Shuheng Wu, Wei Wu","doi":"10.1002/advs.202507839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Maintaining cellular ploidy is critical for normal physiological processes, although gains in ploidy are frequently observed during development, tissue regeneration, and metabolism, and potentially contribute to aneuploidy, thereby promoting tumor evolution. Although numerous computational tools have been developed to estimate cellular ploidy from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data at bulk or single-cell resolution, to the knowledge, no systematic comparison of their performance has been conducted. Here, a benchmarking study is presented of 11 methods for bulk WGS and 8 methods for single-cell WGS data, utilizing both experimental and simulated datasets derived from diploid cells mixed with aneuploid or polyploid cells. For bulk WGS tools, their performance is evaluated in estimating tumor purity and ploidy, as well as the influence of preprocessing steps, somatic mutation callers, purity, sequencing platforms, and depths. It is found that PURPLE outperforms other methods when tumor purity exceeded 30%, regardless of sequencing coverage or platform. However, all existing tools performed poorly applied to euploid samples or long-read sequencing data. For single-cell WGS tools, their ploidy detection accuracy is assessed, and SeCNV is identified as the top-performing method. These findings provide valuable guidance for future research on ploidy analysis and ongoing improvements in computational tools for single-cell sequencing data.</p>","PeriodicalId":117,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Science","volume":" ","pages":"e07839"},"PeriodicalIF":14.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202507839","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Maintaining cellular ploidy is critical for normal physiological processes, although gains in ploidy are frequently observed during development, tissue regeneration, and metabolism, and potentially contribute to aneuploidy, thereby promoting tumor evolution. Although numerous computational tools have been developed to estimate cellular ploidy from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data at bulk or single-cell resolution, to the knowledge, no systematic comparison of their performance has been conducted. Here, a benchmarking study is presented of 11 methods for bulk WGS and 8 methods for single-cell WGS data, utilizing both experimental and simulated datasets derived from diploid cells mixed with aneuploid or polyploid cells. For bulk WGS tools, their performance is evaluated in estimating tumor purity and ploidy, as well as the influence of preprocessing steps, somatic mutation callers, purity, sequencing platforms, and depths. It is found that PURPLE outperforms other methods when tumor purity exceeded 30%, regardless of sequencing coverage or platform. However, all existing tools performed poorly applied to euploid samples or long-read sequencing data. For single-cell WGS tools, their ploidy detection accuracy is assessed, and SeCNV is identified as the top-performing method. These findings provide valuable guidance for future research on ploidy analysis and ongoing improvements in computational tools for single-cell sequencing data.
期刊介绍:
Advanced Science is a prestigious open access journal that focuses on interdisciplinary research in materials science, physics, chemistry, medical and life sciences, and engineering. The journal aims to promote cutting-edge research by employing a rigorous and impartial review process. It is committed to presenting research articles with the highest quality production standards, ensuring maximum accessibility of top scientific findings. With its vibrant and innovative publication platform, Advanced Science seeks to revolutionize the dissemination and organization of scientific knowledge.