Bradley R Collins, Ashley N Walker, Phuong B Huynh, Alyson Adams, Daniel B Topping, Venkatesh Nonabur, Kyle E Rarey
{"title":"A pilot study of the anatomical self-efficacy instrument for clinical clerkships (ASEI-CC).","authors":"Bradley R Collins, Ashley N Walker, Phuong B Huynh, Alyson Adams, Daniel B Topping, Venkatesh Nonabur, Kyle E Rarey","doi":"10.1002/ase.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-efficacy and anatomical knowledge have been shown to be important in the development of medical students. Validated instruments designed to measure the construct of anatomical self-efficacy during the clinical years of medical school are limited. In this study, the Anatomical Self-Efficacy Instrument for Clinical Clerkships (ASEI-CC) was developed, and evidence for the reliability of the scores and the validity of the interpretations of the scores was gathered. The ASEI-CC consisted of 10- Likert-type items designed to measure anatomical self-efficacy, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anatomical self-efficacy. To conduct pilot testing for the ASEI-CC, a sample of 99 medical students rotating through the medicine, surgery, pediatrics, neurology, family medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology clerkships at a Southeastern institution in 2023 was recruited to complete an anonymous survey at the conclusion of an anatomy workshop. In the sample of 99 medical students in this study, the observed means of the scores on the items of the ASEI-CC ranged from 3.84 to 4.37, representing an average response of \"fairly confident\" to \"very confident\" on each item. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring yielded a unidimensional factor structure that explained 62.6% of the variance, with all 10 items having a factor loading greater than 0.4. This study provides evidence that supports the reliability of scores and the validity of the interpretations of scores on the ASEI-CC and extends scholarship about the anatomical self-efficacy of medical students to the clinical years of the medical school curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Self-efficacy and anatomical knowledge have been shown to be important in the development of medical students. Validated instruments designed to measure the construct of anatomical self-efficacy during the clinical years of medical school are limited. In this study, the Anatomical Self-Efficacy Instrument for Clinical Clerkships (ASEI-CC) was developed, and evidence for the reliability of the scores and the validity of the interpretations of the scores was gathered. The ASEI-CC consisted of 10- Likert-type items designed to measure anatomical self-efficacy, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anatomical self-efficacy. To conduct pilot testing for the ASEI-CC, a sample of 99 medical students rotating through the medicine, surgery, pediatrics, neurology, family medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology clerkships at a Southeastern institution in 2023 was recruited to complete an anonymous survey at the conclusion of an anatomy workshop. In the sample of 99 medical students in this study, the observed means of the scores on the items of the ASEI-CC ranged from 3.84 to 4.37, representing an average response of "fairly confident" to "very confident" on each item. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring yielded a unidimensional factor structure that explained 62.6% of the variance, with all 10 items having a factor loading greater than 0.4. This study provides evidence that supports the reliability of scores and the validity of the interpretations of scores on the ASEI-CC and extends scholarship about the anatomical self-efficacy of medical students to the clinical years of the medical school curriculum.
期刊介绍:
Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.