{"title":"Dose-response Association between Hand Dexterity and Functional Disability: A Longitudinal Study from the Kasama Study.","authors":"Namhoon Lim, Kenji Tsunoda, Jaehoon Seol, Yujiro Asano, Koki Nagata, Taishi Tsuji, Keisuke Fujii, Yuya Fujii, Kaori Teraoka, Tomohiro Okura","doi":"10.4235/agmr.25.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor hand dexterity may increase the risk of functional disability; however, few studies have examined the relationship between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the dose-response association of hand dexterity with incident functional disability in community-dwelling older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 1,069 older adults aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Peg-moving and circle-drawing tasks were used to evaluate hand dexterity. Functional disability was identified using the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System database. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to investigate the dose-response association between hand dexterity and incident functional disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (maximum 14.0 years), 248 participants (23.2%) developed functional disability. The lowest performance group in each hand dexterity test had a significantly higher risk of functional disability than the highest performance group (peg-moving: HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.87; circle drawing: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.41). Spline analysis confirmed curvilinear dose-response associations between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Increased risk was observed when participants performed worse than the cut points (peg-moving: 37.9/38.0 seconds; circle drawing: 21/20 points), and no decreased risk was observed for those who performed better than these cut points.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Easily evaluated hand dexterity tests may be valuable for predicting functional disability in older adults. Curvilinear dose-response associations suggest that maintaining adequate hand dexterity could be a key strategy to support functional independence.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.25.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Poor hand dexterity may increase the risk of functional disability; however, few studies have examined the relationship between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the dose-response association of hand dexterity with incident functional disability in community-dwelling older adults.
Methods: This study included 1,069 older adults aged ≥65 years in Kasama City, Japan. Peg-moving and circle-drawing tasks were used to evaluate hand dexterity. Functional disability was identified using the Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System database. Restricted cubic spline analysis was performed to investigate the dose-response association between hand dexterity and incident functional disability.
Results: During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (maximum 14.0 years), 248 participants (23.2%) developed functional disability. The lowest performance group in each hand dexterity test had a significantly higher risk of functional disability than the highest performance group (peg-moving: HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.29-2.87; circle drawing: HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15-2.41). Spline analysis confirmed curvilinear dose-response associations between hand dexterity and incident functional disability. Increased risk was observed when participants performed worse than the cut points (peg-moving: 37.9/38.0 seconds; circle drawing: 21/20 points), and no decreased risk was observed for those who performed better than these cut points.
Conclusion: Easily evaluated hand dexterity tests may be valuable for predicting functional disability in older adults. Curvilinear dose-response associations suggest that maintaining adequate hand dexterity could be a key strategy to support functional independence.