Exploring the Failed Implementation of an Entrustable Professional Activities-Based Curriculum for Pediatric Residency: "It's What We Always Asked For, And Now Nobody Does It." A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Lena Moschinski-van Treel, Hans Martin Bosse, Lisa Marie Körner, Bernhard Steinweg, Janna-Lina Kerth
{"title":"Exploring the Failed Implementation of an Entrustable Professional Activities-Based Curriculum for Pediatric Residency: \"It's What We Always Asked For, And Now Nobody Does It.\" A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Lena Moschinski-van Treel, Hans Martin Bosse, Lisa Marie Körner, Bernhard Steinweg, Janna-Lina Kerth","doi":"10.1177/23821205251370214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical education has been experiencing a transition from time- to competency-based. Since their introduction by Olle ten Cate in 2005, entrustable professional activities are a part of this process. We implemented a set of EPAs for the first 3 years of training at our hospital, encompassed by informational materials for trainees and supervisors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to assess barriers and facilitators for the implementation of entrustable professional activities in pediatric residency in a German tertiary hospital. Furthermore, our aim was to explore how they foster self-regulated learning and feedback, and to identify barriers and facilitators on the path to more confidence and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied a qualitative approach with focus-group discussions (adhering to COREQ guidelines), 3 each with residents and supervisors. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified. Data analysis was conducted based on qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three months after the implementation, no resident had fulfilled the required assessments. In the discussions, we identified barriers to and facilitators of the process. Both may be attributed to internal and external factors. The concept was supported by residents and supervisors, but time, priorities in the clinical routine, lack of initiative, and an inhibition on the part of the residents to approach the supervisors were the main reasons for the concept to fail. We identified a higher degree of structure, as well as commitment and accountability, as possible facilitators.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Entrustable professional activities are a promising means of promoting self-regulated learning and a positive feedback culture to increase confidence and safety in clinical practice. Our findings expose the factors that disrupt or promote this process. Our data provide guidance for implementation in a setting with little experience with this tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251370214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251370214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical education has been experiencing a transition from time- to competency-based. Since their introduction by Olle ten Cate in 2005, entrustable professional activities are a part of this process. We implemented a set of EPAs for the first 3 years of training at our hospital, encompassed by informational materials for trainees and supervisors.

Objectives: Our objective was to assess barriers and facilitators for the implementation of entrustable professional activities in pediatric residency in a German tertiary hospital. Furthermore, our aim was to explore how they foster self-regulated learning and feedback, and to identify barriers and facilitators on the path to more confidence and safety.

Methods: We applied a qualitative approach with focus-group discussions (adhering to COREQ guidelines), 3 each with residents and supervisors. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified. Data analysis was conducted based on qualitative content analysis.

Results: Three months after the implementation, no resident had fulfilled the required assessments. In the discussions, we identified barriers to and facilitators of the process. Both may be attributed to internal and external factors. The concept was supported by residents and supervisors, but time, priorities in the clinical routine, lack of initiative, and an inhibition on the part of the residents to approach the supervisors were the main reasons for the concept to fail. We identified a higher degree of structure, as well as commitment and accountability, as possible facilitators.

Conclusion: Entrustable professional activities are a promising means of promoting self-regulated learning and a positive feedback culture to increase confidence and safety in clinical practice. Our findings expose the factors that disrupt or promote this process. Our data provide guidance for implementation in a setting with little experience with this tool.

Abstract Image

探索儿科住院医师可信赖的专业活动课程的失败实施:“这是我们一直要求的,但现在没有人这样做。”定性研究。
背景:医学教育正经历着从以时间为基础向以能力为基础的转变。自2005年Olle ten Cate引入以来,可信赖的专业活动是这一过程的一部分。我们在医院前三年的培训中实施了一套EPAs,其中包含了培训生和主管的信息材料。目的:我们的目的是评估障碍和促进在德国三级医院儿科住院医师可信赖的专业活动的实施。此外,我们的目标是探索他们如何促进自我调节的学习和反馈,并确定通往更自信和安全的道路上的障碍和促进者。方法:我们采用定性方法进行焦点小组讨论(遵循COREQ指南),分别与居民和主管进行讨论。对焦点小组进行记录,逐字转录,并去识别。数据分析基于定性内容分析。结果:实施3个月后,无住院医师达到考核要求。在讨论中,我们确定了这一进程的障碍和促进因素。两者都可归因于内部和外部因素。该概念得到了住院医师和督导医师的支持,但时间、临床常规的优先顺序、缺乏主动性以及住院医师对督导医师的抑制是该概念失败的主要原因。我们确定了更高程度的结构,以及承诺和问责制,作为可能的促进者。结论:可信赖的专业活动是促进自我调节学习和积极反馈文化的一种有希望的手段,可以增加临床实践的信心和安全性。我们的发现揭示了破坏或促进这一过程的因素。我们的数据为在使用该工具经验不足的环境中实施提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信