Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Barriers Regarding the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing and Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 Q2 NURSING
SAGE Open Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23779608251374185
Nesreen Alqaissi, Mohammed Qtait
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices, and Barriers Regarding the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing and Health Sciences Education: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nesreen Alqaissi, Mohammed Qtait","doi":"10.1177/23779608251374185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare education and practice, making it essential for nursing and health sciences students to develop relevant competencies. However, their preparedness to engage meaningfully with AI in academic and clinical environments remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review synthesizes global evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers (KAPB) related to AI among students in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, and allied health disciplines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2020 and February 2025. Fourteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included. The review protocol was not registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students generally demonstrated high awareness of AI, but formal training was limited. Knowledge was often acquired informally through social media or peer networks. While attitudes toward AI were largely positive, students expressed ethical concerns and anxiety related to AI use. Practical engagement with AI was mostly restricted to academic writing tasks, with minimal clinical application. Major barriers included the absence of AI-focused curricula, limited faculty expertise, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data privacy, ethics, and job displacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite growing interest in AI, significant gaps remain in health sciences education. Comprehensive strategies such as curriculum integration, faculty development, and ethical training are urgently needed to foster responsible, confident, and clinically relevant AI adoption among future healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":43312,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Nursing","volume":"11 ","pages":"23779608251374185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251374185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare education and practice, making it essential for nursing and health sciences students to develop relevant competencies. However, their preparedness to engage meaningfully with AI in academic and clinical environments remains uncertain.

Objectives: This systematic review synthesizes global evidence on the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers (KAPB) related to AI among students in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, and allied health disciplines.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2020 and February 2025. Fourteen studies meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were included. The review protocol was not registered.

Results: Students generally demonstrated high awareness of AI, but formal training was limited. Knowledge was often acquired informally through social media or peer networks. While attitudes toward AI were largely positive, students expressed ethical concerns and anxiety related to AI use. Practical engagement with AI was mostly restricted to academic writing tasks, with minimal clinical application. Major barriers included the absence of AI-focused curricula, limited faculty expertise, inadequate infrastructure, and concerns over data privacy, ethics, and job displacement.

Conclusion: Despite growing interest in AI, significant gaps remain in health sciences education. Comprehensive strategies such as curriculum integration, faculty development, and ethical training are urgently needed to foster responsible, confident, and clinically relevant AI adoption among future healthcare professionals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

关于人工智能在护理和健康科学教育中的整合的知识、态度、实践和障碍:系统综述。
背景:人工智能(AI)正在迅速改变医疗保健教育和实践,使护理和健康科学专业学生培养相关能力至关重要。然而,他们是否准备好在学术和临床环境中有意义地使用人工智能仍然不确定。目的:本系统综述综合了护理、医学、药学和相关卫生学科学生中与人工智能相关的知识、态度、实践和障碍(KAPB)的全球证据。方法:按照PRISMA 2020指南,系统检索PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar,检索2020年1月至2025年2月间发表的同行评议文章。14项符合纳入标准的研究采用叙事综合法进行分析。包括定量和定性研究。审查方案未注册。结果:学生普遍表现出较高的人工智能意识,但正规培训有限。知识通常是通过社交媒体或同伴网络非正式地获得的。虽然对人工智能的态度基本上是积极的,但学生们表达了与人工智能使用相关的伦理担忧和焦虑。人工智能的实际应用主要局限于学术写作任务,很少有临床应用。主要障碍包括缺乏以人工智能为重点的课程、教师专业知识有限、基础设施不足,以及对数据隐私、道德和失业的担忧。结论:尽管人们对人工智能的兴趣日益浓厚,但在健康科学教育方面仍存在显著差距。迫切需要全面的战略,如课程整合、教师发展和道德培训,以促进未来医疗保健专业人员负责任、自信和临床相关的人工智能采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信