Ousman Bajinka, Musa Kora, Ousman Sanyang, Serge Yannick Ouedraogo, Momodou G Bah, Lamarana Jallow
{"title":"Bio-ethical issues of research in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Ousman Bajinka, Musa Kora, Ousman Sanyang, Serge Yannick Ouedraogo, Momodou G Bah, Lamarana Jallow","doi":"10.1007/s40592-025-00264-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines bioethical considerations of research conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a notable scarcity persists in literature addressing region-specific bioethical issues. Although bioethics-related activities have encountered challenges surpassing existing protocol safeguards, emerging evidence demonstrates growing recognition of integrated scientific and ethical principles within African medical research. Maintaining research continuity in resource-limited settings necessitates bridging critical gaps between informed consent procedures and participants' actual understanding. This narrative review assesses progress, identifies persistent challenges, and outlines future directions for clinical trials and medical research in SSA, with particular focus on adherence to established bioethical standards and integration of local normative frameworks. Our analysis reveals a significant increase in publications featuring rigorous ethical discourse about bioethical research in Africa, with particular emphasis on SSA, in recent years. The review underscores substantial deficits in ethical conduct, including frequent non-compliance with fundamental principles: informed consent, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Furthermore, we identify a paucity of evidence concerning methodologies to improve the efficacy and quality of ethical review mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00264-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper examines bioethical considerations of research conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where a notable scarcity persists in literature addressing region-specific bioethical issues. Although bioethics-related activities have encountered challenges surpassing existing protocol safeguards, emerging evidence demonstrates growing recognition of integrated scientific and ethical principles within African medical research. Maintaining research continuity in resource-limited settings necessitates bridging critical gaps between informed consent procedures and participants' actual understanding. This narrative review assesses progress, identifies persistent challenges, and outlines future directions for clinical trials and medical research in SSA, with particular focus on adherence to established bioethical standards and integration of local normative frameworks. Our analysis reveals a significant increase in publications featuring rigorous ethical discourse about bioethical research in Africa, with particular emphasis on SSA, in recent years. The review underscores substantial deficits in ethical conduct, including frequent non-compliance with fundamental principles: informed consent, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Furthermore, we identify a paucity of evidence concerning methodologies to improve the efficacy and quality of ethical review mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world.
An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance.
Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications.
One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre.
Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length.
Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary