Rural Revolution in Bolivia: Landlord Stubbornness, Colonial Intellectuals, and Rural Jacobins (1952–1953)

0 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI:10.1111/johs.70004
Arián Laguna Quiroga
{"title":"Rural Revolution in Bolivia: Landlord Stubbornness, Colonial Intellectuals, and Rural Jacobins (1952–1953)","authors":"Arián Laguna Quiroga","doi":"10.1111/johs.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the peasant revolution that took place in Bolivia between November 1952 and November 1953 and seeks to explain why the peasantry took a revolutionary path. While existing explanations have emphasized the exploitative nature of the <i>hacienda</i> and the influence of external political actors, this article argues that the revolutionary path was by no means inevitable or an <i>automatic</i> consequence of those factors; it was the outcome of the actors' beliefs, decisions, and interactions during the historical conjuncture of 1952. To trace this process, the article identifies two interlinked phases. The first was marked by increased landlord exploitation, the passivity—and even complicity—of MNR authorities, and the radicalizing activity of political agitators and union organizers. This combination made the reformist path seem untenable from the peasant point of view, leading to the radicalization of rural regions that had previously pursued more reformist approaches. During the second phase, a rural insurrection spread across most of Cochabamba's provinces. This coordinated peasant insurrection—never previously analyzed as such—evolved from the seizure of haciendas to a broader struggle for rural political power, ultimately turning into a revolution not only against landlords, but against the MNR itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":"38 3","pages":"212-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/johs.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the peasant revolution that took place in Bolivia between November 1952 and November 1953 and seeks to explain why the peasantry took a revolutionary path. While existing explanations have emphasized the exploitative nature of the hacienda and the influence of external political actors, this article argues that the revolutionary path was by no means inevitable or an automatic consequence of those factors; it was the outcome of the actors' beliefs, decisions, and interactions during the historical conjuncture of 1952. To trace this process, the article identifies two interlinked phases. The first was marked by increased landlord exploitation, the passivity—and even complicity—of MNR authorities, and the radicalizing activity of political agitators and union organizers. This combination made the reformist path seem untenable from the peasant point of view, leading to the radicalization of rural regions that had previously pursued more reformist approaches. During the second phase, a rural insurrection spread across most of Cochabamba's provinces. This coordinated peasant insurrection—never previously analyzed as such—evolved from the seizure of haciendas to a broader struggle for rural political power, ultimately turning into a revolution not only against landlords, but against the MNR itself.

Abstract Image

玻利维亚农村革命:地主顽固性、殖民地知识分子和农村雅各宾派(1952-1953)
本文检视1952年11月至1953年11月发生在玻利维亚的农民革命,并试图解释为何农民走上革命道路。虽然现有的解释强调了庄园的剥削性质和外部政治行动者的影响,但本文认为,革命道路绝不是不可避免的,也不是这些因素的自动结果;它是演员们在1952年的历史关头的信念、决定和相互作用的结果。为了跟踪这一过程,本文确定了两个相互关联的阶段。第一个阶段的特点是地主剥削的增加,民族解放运动当局的被动——甚至是共谋——以及政治鼓动者和工会组织者的激进活动。从农民的角度来看,这种结合使得改良主义的道路似乎站不住脚,导致以前追求更多改良主义方法的农村地区的激进化。在第二阶段,一场农村起义蔓延到科恰班巴的大部分省份。这场协调一致的农民起义——以前从未被这样分析过——从夺取庄园演变为更广泛的农村政治权力斗争,最终演变为一场不仅反对地主,而且反对民族革命党本身的革命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信