Comparison of Self-Heating Behavior Between Continuous and Interrupted Control Modes

IF 3.2 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Hamza Elhadri, Johann Petit, Naila Hfaiedh, Danièle Wagner, Olivier Polit
{"title":"Comparison of Self-Heating Behavior Between Continuous and Interrupted Control Modes","authors":"Hamza Elhadri,&nbsp;Johann Petit,&nbsp;Naila Hfaiedh,&nbsp;Danièle Wagner,&nbsp;Olivier Polit","doi":"10.1111/ffe.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In gigacyclic fatigue testing, reaching 10<sup>9</sup> cycles within a reasonable duration is challenging, leading to the use of ultrasonic fatigue machines operating at 20 kHz (UFT). However, the high testing frequency causes significant temperature rises, potentially enhancing microplasticity and leading to premature failure. This study compares two control modes in gigacyclic fatigue: continuous and interrupted (pulse-pause) during self-heating tests on UFT. Two materials with distinct thermal properties, steel 42CrMo4 and aluminum alloy AA2024-T351, were tested. The temperature evolution was measured using an infrared camera. Then, a local expression of the heat equation is used to estimate the intrinsic dissipation, denoted as \n<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub></math>. Results showed that both modes led to temperature increases with higher displacement, but pulse-pause caused a smaller temperature rise. Reducing the pulse time relative to the pause time decreased temperature variation. For 42CrMo4 steel, self-heating was more pronounced than for AA2024-T351, and the \n<span></span><math>\n <msub>\n <mi>d</mi>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub></math> value increased with displacement amplitude.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12298,"journal":{"name":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","volume":"48 10","pages":"4517-4527"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ffe.70038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In gigacyclic fatigue testing, reaching 109 cycles within a reasonable duration is challenging, leading to the use of ultrasonic fatigue machines operating at 20 kHz (UFT). However, the high testing frequency causes significant temperature rises, potentially enhancing microplasticity and leading to premature failure. This study compares two control modes in gigacyclic fatigue: continuous and interrupted (pulse-pause) during self-heating tests on UFT. Two materials with distinct thermal properties, steel 42CrMo4 and aluminum alloy AA2024-T351, were tested. The temperature evolution was measured using an infrared camera. Then, a local expression of the heat equation is used to estimate the intrinsic dissipation, denoted as d 1 . Results showed that both modes led to temperature increases with higher displacement, but pulse-pause caused a smaller temperature rise. Reducing the pulse time relative to the pause time decreased temperature variation. For 42CrMo4 steel, self-heating was more pronounced than for AA2024-T351, and the d 1 value increased with displacement amplitude.

连续和中断控制模式的自热行为比较
在千兆循环疲劳测试中,在合理的持续时间内达到109个循环是具有挑战性的,因此需要使用工作频率为20 kHz (UFT)的超声波疲劳试验机。然而,高测试频率会导致显著的温升,潜在地增强微塑性并导致过早破坏。本研究比较了UFT自热试验中超循环疲劳的两种控制模式:连续和中断(脉冲暂停)。试验了两种热性能不同的材料:42CrMo4钢和AA2024-T351铝合金。用红外摄像机测量了温度的变化。然后,利用热方程的局部表达式估计本征耗散,记为d1。结果表明:两种模式均导致温度随位移增大而升高,但脉冲暂停导致的温度升高较小;减少脉冲时间相对于暂停时间减少温度变化。42CrMo4钢的自热比AA2024-T351钢更明显,且d1值随位移幅值的增大而增大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
256
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures (FFEMS) encompasses the broad topic of structural integrity which is founded on the mechanics of fatigue and fracture, and is concerned with the reliability and effectiveness of various materials and structural components of any scale or geometry. The editors publish original contributions that will stimulate the intellectual innovation that generates elegant, effective and economic engineering designs. The journal is interdisciplinary and includes papers from scientists and engineers in the fields of materials science, mechanics, physics, chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信