{"title":"Corporate Climate Investments and Their Impact on Financing Decisions: Evidence From Leading Firms in the Brown Economy","authors":"Bilal Haider Subhani, Shen Zunhuan, An Pengbei","doi":"10.1002/mde.4561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explores the supporting dynamics of the trade-off notion and Porter's win–win hypothesis by conducting an empirical analysis between corporate climate investments (CCI) and strategic financial management approaches. For this purpose, we consider Chinese A-shares listed corporations from 2010 to 2022. Utilizing a two-step system generalized method of moment (GMM) for regression analysis; the findings reveal an inverse relationship between CCI and debt financing approach (DFA) because financial institutions incorporate environmental risks into their lending decisions, leading to higher interest rates that deter corporations from leveraging debt. However, a notable and positive correlation exists between the CCI and the equity financing approach (EFA). This relationship arises because investments in climate-related initiatives significantly enhance a corporation's public image, demonstrating its commitment to environmental sustainability and social responsibility. Such actions foster investor goodwill and trust, aligning with broader sustainable development goals. Consequently, this alignment renders the EFA increasingly appealing to investors. These findings highlight the strategic importance of CCI in contemporary corporate finance, underlining their twofold capacity to foster corporate and environmental sustainability. Moreover, this study challenges the traditional Trade-off paradigm, which posits that companies must choose between environmental sustainability and economic performance. In contrast, it supports Porter's win–win hypothesis, advocating for an integrated corporate strategy that aligns environmental and economic sustainability, highlighting the potential for businesses to achieve both objectives simultaneously.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3895-3913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores the supporting dynamics of the trade-off notion and Porter's win–win hypothesis by conducting an empirical analysis between corporate climate investments (CCI) and strategic financial management approaches. For this purpose, we consider Chinese A-shares listed corporations from 2010 to 2022. Utilizing a two-step system generalized method of moment (GMM) for regression analysis; the findings reveal an inverse relationship between CCI and debt financing approach (DFA) because financial institutions incorporate environmental risks into their lending decisions, leading to higher interest rates that deter corporations from leveraging debt. However, a notable and positive correlation exists between the CCI and the equity financing approach (EFA). This relationship arises because investments in climate-related initiatives significantly enhance a corporation's public image, demonstrating its commitment to environmental sustainability and social responsibility. Such actions foster investor goodwill and trust, aligning with broader sustainable development goals. Consequently, this alignment renders the EFA increasingly appealing to investors. These findings highlight the strategic importance of CCI in contemporary corporate finance, underlining their twofold capacity to foster corporate and environmental sustainability. Moreover, this study challenges the traditional Trade-off paradigm, which posits that companies must choose between environmental sustainability and economic performance. In contrast, it supports Porter's win–win hypothesis, advocating for an integrated corporate strategy that aligns environmental and economic sustainability, highlighting the potential for businesses to achieve both objectives simultaneously.
期刊介绍:
Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.