Corporate Climate Investments and Their Impact on Financing Decisions: Evidence From Leading Firms in the Brown Economy

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Bilal Haider Subhani, Shen Zunhuan, An Pengbei
{"title":"Corporate Climate Investments and Their Impact on Financing Decisions: Evidence From Leading Firms in the Brown Economy","authors":"Bilal Haider Subhani,&nbsp;Shen Zunhuan,&nbsp;An Pengbei","doi":"10.1002/mde.4561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study explores the supporting dynamics of the trade-off notion and Porter's win–win hypothesis by conducting an empirical analysis between corporate climate investments (CCI) and strategic financial management approaches. For this purpose, we consider Chinese A-shares listed corporations from 2010 to 2022. Utilizing a two-step system generalized method of moment (GMM) for regression analysis; the findings reveal an inverse relationship between CCI and debt financing approach (DFA) because financial institutions incorporate environmental risks into their lending decisions, leading to higher interest rates that deter corporations from leveraging debt. However, a notable and positive correlation exists between the CCI and the equity financing approach (EFA). This relationship arises because investments in climate-related initiatives significantly enhance a corporation's public image, demonstrating its commitment to environmental sustainability and social responsibility. Such actions foster investor goodwill and trust, aligning with broader sustainable development goals. Consequently, this alignment renders the EFA increasingly appealing to investors. These findings highlight the strategic importance of CCI in contemporary corporate finance, underlining their twofold capacity to foster corporate and environmental sustainability. Moreover, this study challenges the traditional Trade-off paradigm, which posits that companies must choose between environmental sustainability and economic performance. In contrast, it supports Porter's win–win hypothesis, advocating for an integrated corporate strategy that aligns environmental and economic sustainability, highlighting the potential for businesses to achieve both objectives simultaneously.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 7","pages":"3895-3913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the supporting dynamics of the trade-off notion and Porter's win–win hypothesis by conducting an empirical analysis between corporate climate investments (CCI) and strategic financial management approaches. For this purpose, we consider Chinese A-shares listed corporations from 2010 to 2022. Utilizing a two-step system generalized method of moment (GMM) for regression analysis; the findings reveal an inverse relationship between CCI and debt financing approach (DFA) because financial institutions incorporate environmental risks into their lending decisions, leading to higher interest rates that deter corporations from leveraging debt. However, a notable and positive correlation exists between the CCI and the equity financing approach (EFA). This relationship arises because investments in climate-related initiatives significantly enhance a corporation's public image, demonstrating its commitment to environmental sustainability and social responsibility. Such actions foster investor goodwill and trust, aligning with broader sustainable development goals. Consequently, this alignment renders the EFA increasingly appealing to investors. These findings highlight the strategic importance of CCI in contemporary corporate finance, underlining their twofold capacity to foster corporate and environmental sustainability. Moreover, this study challenges the traditional Trade-off paradigm, which posits that companies must choose between environmental sustainability and economic performance. In contrast, it supports Porter's win–win hypothesis, advocating for an integrated corporate strategy that aligns environmental and economic sustainability, highlighting the potential for businesses to achieve both objectives simultaneously.

企业气候投资及其对融资决策的影响:来自棕色经济龙头企业的证据
本研究通过对企业气候投资(CCI)和战略财务管理方法之间的实证分析,探讨了权衡概念和波特双赢假设的支持动力。为此,我们以2010年至2022年的中国a股上市公司为研究对象。利用两步系统广义矩法进行回归分析研究结果揭示了CCI与债务融资方式(DFA)之间的反比关系,因为金融机构将环境风险纳入其贷款决策,导致更高的利率阻碍了企业利用债务。然而,CCI与股权融资方式(EFA)之间存在显著的正相关关系。这种关系的产生是因为对气候相关倡议的投资大大提高了公司的公众形象,表明了其对环境可持续性和社会责任的承诺。这些行动促进了投资者的善意和信任,与更广泛的可持续发展目标保持一致。因此,这种一致性使得EFA对投资者越来越有吸引力。这些发现突出了CCI在当代企业融资中的战略重要性,强调了它们促进企业和环境可持续性的双重能力。此外,本研究挑战了传统的权衡范式,该范式认为公司必须在环境可持续性和经济绩效之间做出选择。相比之下,它支持波特的双赢假设,倡导将环境和经济可持续性结合起来的综合企业战略,强调企业同时实现这两个目标的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信