Standards and Regulations for Battery Management Systems in Germany: Review and Improvement Potentials

IF 6.4 4区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Dilane Dongmo Tadoum, Franziska Berger, Florian Krause, David Wasylowski, Florian Ringbeck, Weihan Li, Dirk Uwe Sauer
{"title":"Standards and Regulations for Battery Management Systems in Germany: Review and Improvement Potentials","authors":"Dilane Dongmo Tadoum,&nbsp;Franziska Berger,&nbsp;Florian Krause,&nbsp;David Wasylowski,&nbsp;Florian Ringbeck,&nbsp;Weihan Li,&nbsp;Dirk Uwe Sauer","doi":"10.1002/gch2.202500129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Battery performance and safety heavily depend on battery management systems (BMS), which monitor and control them during operation. Given its crucial role, a BMS should meet several requirements in functionality, performance, robustness, and reliability, often defined in standards and regulations. Considering rapid technological advancements in batteries, updating these requirements is essential to reflect growing system complexity. Therefore, this study reviews current standards and regulations for BMSs in Germany, a key player in the global battery sector. It distinguishes between functional and non-functional, as well as qualitative and quantitative requirements. The review finds that most existing standards focus on qualitative aspects and lack measurable benchmarks, particularly for critical BMS functions like state monitoring and energy management. To address this, this study proposes improvement suggestions and highlights the need for consistent definitions and performance requirements, especially for the state of charge (SoC) and state of health (SoH). It also identifies emerging challenges, such as second-life batteries, BMS, and cloud BMS as important areas for future standards. By mapping standards to BMS functions and identifying gaps, this work offers valuable guidance for improving BMS performance, interoperability, and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12646,"journal":{"name":"Global Challenges","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gch2.202500129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gch2.202500129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery performance and safety heavily depend on battery management systems (BMS), which monitor and control them during operation. Given its crucial role, a BMS should meet several requirements in functionality, performance, robustness, and reliability, often defined in standards and regulations. Considering rapid technological advancements in batteries, updating these requirements is essential to reflect growing system complexity. Therefore, this study reviews current standards and regulations for BMSs in Germany, a key player in the global battery sector. It distinguishes between functional and non-functional, as well as qualitative and quantitative requirements. The review finds that most existing standards focus on qualitative aspects and lack measurable benchmarks, particularly for critical BMS functions like state monitoring and energy management. To address this, this study proposes improvement suggestions and highlights the need for consistent definitions and performance requirements, especially for the state of charge (SoC) and state of health (SoH). It also identifies emerging challenges, such as second-life batteries, BMS, and cloud BMS as important areas for future standards. By mapping standards to BMS functions and identifying gaps, this work offers valuable guidance for improving BMS performance, interoperability, and safety.

Abstract Image

德国电池管理系统的标准和法规:回顾和改进潜力
电池的性能和安全性在很大程度上取决于电池管理系统(BMS),该系统在运行过程中对电池进行监测和控制。鉴于其关键作用,BMS应该满足功能、性能、健壮性和可靠性方面的几个要求,这些要求通常在标准和法规中定义。考虑到电池技术的快速发展,更新这些要求是必要的,以反映日益增长的系统复杂性。因此,本研究回顾了德国bms的现行标准和法规,德国是全球电池行业的关键参与者。它区分功能性和非功能性需求,以及定性和定量需求。审查发现,大多数现有标准侧重于定性方面,缺乏可衡量的基准,特别是对于关键的BMS功能,如状态监测和能源管理。为了解决这个问题,本研究提出了改进建议,并强调需要一致的定义和性能要求,特别是对于充电状态(SoC)和健康状态(SoH)。它还确定了新出现的挑战,如二次电池、BMS和云BMS,这些都是未来标准的重要领域。通过将标准映射到BMS功能并确定差距,这项工作为改进BMS性能、互操作性和安全性提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Challenges
Global Challenges MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信