Intraoperative Arterial Blood Flow and Stump Pressure Measurements in Internal Carotid Artery Near-Occlusion

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mahia Aivaz Ihari, Mari Holsti, Alexander Henze, Joakim Nordanstig, Annika Nordanstig, Sofia Strömberg, Allan J. Fox, Elias Johansson
{"title":"Intraoperative Arterial Blood Flow and Stump Pressure Measurements in Internal Carotid Artery Near-Occlusion","authors":"Mahia Aivaz Ihari,&nbsp;Mari Holsti,&nbsp;Alexander Henze,&nbsp;Joakim Nordanstig,&nbsp;Annika Nordanstig,&nbsp;Sofia Strömberg,&nbsp;Allan J. Fox,&nbsp;Elias Johansson","doi":"10.1155/ane/4620206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Near-occlusion (NO) with and without full collapse seems to cause low blood flow in symptomatic carotid stenosis. If the stroke mechanism is hypoperfusion in NO, the stump pressure should be low. The aim was to compare and describe stump pressure and blood flow in conventional ≥ 50% stenosis, NO without full collapse, and NO with full collapse. In this prospective single-center study, consecutive patients with symptomatic ≥ 50% carotid stenosis (NASCET grading), undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were recruited. NO was diagnosed by three blinded observers who reviewed computed tomography angiographies (CTA). Intraoperative measurements of ICA flow before and after CEA and stump pressure were recorded. One hundred and eighty-one patients were included; 116 (64%) had conventional ≥ 50% stenosis, and 66 (36%) had NO. Before CEA, the median ICA flow was significantly lower in NO (90 ml/min) compared to conventional ≥ 50% stenosis (170 mL/min, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, no difference was observed after CEA (NO 170 mL/min, conventional ≥ 50% stenosis 180 mL/min, <i>p</i> = 0.48). The ICA flow change was significantly higher in NO compared to conventional stenosis (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the distal ICA diameter on CTA and the ICA flow before CEA (<i>r</i> = 0.579, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were no differences in stump pressure between NO and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (median 53 (range 41–66) mmHg and median 54 (range 40–67) mmHg, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.93), nor any correlation between the stump pressure and the distal ICA diameter (<i>r</i> = 0.063, <i>p</i> = 0.41). NO causes low ICA flow, and to our knowledge, this is the first time this causal link between ICA flow and NO is clearly established. Since patients with NO did not have low stump pressure, the mechanism of stroke in NO does not seem to be hypoperfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/4620206","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/4620206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Near-occlusion (NO) with and without full collapse seems to cause low blood flow in symptomatic carotid stenosis. If the stroke mechanism is hypoperfusion in NO, the stump pressure should be low. The aim was to compare and describe stump pressure and blood flow in conventional ≥ 50% stenosis, NO without full collapse, and NO with full collapse. In this prospective single-center study, consecutive patients with symptomatic ≥ 50% carotid stenosis (NASCET grading), undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were recruited. NO was diagnosed by three blinded observers who reviewed computed tomography angiographies (CTA). Intraoperative measurements of ICA flow before and after CEA and stump pressure were recorded. One hundred and eighty-one patients were included; 116 (64%) had conventional ≥ 50% stenosis, and 66 (36%) had NO. Before CEA, the median ICA flow was significantly lower in NO (90 ml/min) compared to conventional ≥ 50% stenosis (170 mL/min, p < 0.001). In contrast, no difference was observed after CEA (NO 170 mL/min, conventional ≥ 50% stenosis 180 mL/min, p = 0.48). The ICA flow change was significantly higher in NO compared to conventional stenosis (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the distal ICA diameter on CTA and the ICA flow before CEA (r = 0.579, p < 0.001). There were no differences in stump pressure between NO and conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (median 53 (range 41–66) mmHg and median 54 (range 40–67) mmHg, respectively, p = 0.93), nor any correlation between the stump pressure and the distal ICA diameter (r = 0.063, p = 0.41). NO causes low ICA flow, and to our knowledge, this is the first time this causal link between ICA flow and NO is clearly established. Since patients with NO did not have low stump pressure, the mechanism of stroke in NO does not seem to be hypoperfusion.

Abstract Image

术中动脉血流和残端压力测量在颈内动脉近闭塞
有或没有完全塌陷的近闭塞(NO)似乎会引起症状性颈动脉狭窄的低血流量。如果NO的中风机制是低灌注,残端压力应该很低。目的是比较和描述常规≥50%狭窄、NO无完全塌陷和NO有完全塌陷的残端压力和血流量。在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,连续招募了症状性≥50%颈动脉狭窄(NASCET分级)并接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者。NO的诊断是由三名盲眼观察者复查计算机断层血管造影(CTA)。术中测量CEA前后的ICA流量和残端压力。纳入181例患者;常规狭窄≥50% 116例(64%),NO 66例(36%)。CEA前,NO中位ICA流量(90 ml/min)明显低于常规≥50%狭窄(170 ml/min, p < 0.001)。CEA后无差异(no 170 mL/min,常规≥50%狭窄180 mL/min, p = 0.48)。NO组的ICA血流变化明显高于常规狭窄组(p < 0.001)。CTA上ICA远端直径与CEA前ICA血流有显著相关性(r = 0.579, p < 0.001)。no和常规≥50%狭窄患者的残端压力无差异(中位数分别为53 (41-66)mmHg和54 (40-67)mmHg, p = 0.93),残端压力与ICA远端直径无相关性(r = 0.063, p = 0.41)。NO导致低ICA流量,据我们所知,这是第一次明确建立ICA流量和NO之间的因果关系。由于NO患者的残端压不低,NO卒中的机制似乎不是低灌注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信