Accept or Reject: Factors Influencing Nonprofit Responses to Cannabis Industry Philanthropy

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS
Jessica L. Berrett, Kate Quintana, Elisabeth C. McLane
{"title":"Accept or Reject: Factors Influencing Nonprofit Responses to Cannabis Industry Philanthropy","authors":"Jessica L. Berrett,&nbsp;Kate Quintana,&nbsp;Elisabeth C. McLane","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As the cannabis industry engages in philanthropy, nonprofits face complex decisions about whether to accept such donations. Although prior research has focused on the motivations behind corporate giving in stigmatized industries, much less is known about how potential recipients evaluate these contributions. This study explores the organizational and contextual characteristics that shape nonprofit openness to cannabis philanthropy, drawing on institutional, stakeholder, and legitimacy theories. Using survey data from over 300 Colorado nonprofits, we examine how factors such as size, age, mission, population served, federal funding, and local political context influence both attitudes toward and actual acceptance of cannabis-related funding. Results show that smaller and younger organizations appear to exhibit greater openness to cannabis-related donation acceptance. Additionally, mission alignment and the beneficiary population—particularly organizations serving youth—are the strongest predictors of rejection, whereas federal funding is also associated with reluctance. Contrary to expectations, political context does not significantly influence decisions. The findings highlight the normative and resource-dependence pressures through which nonprofits assess and legitimize emerging sources of controversial funding.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.70032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the cannabis industry engages in philanthropy, nonprofits face complex decisions about whether to accept such donations. Although prior research has focused on the motivations behind corporate giving in stigmatized industries, much less is known about how potential recipients evaluate these contributions. This study explores the organizational and contextual characteristics that shape nonprofit openness to cannabis philanthropy, drawing on institutional, stakeholder, and legitimacy theories. Using survey data from over 300 Colorado nonprofits, we examine how factors such as size, age, mission, population served, federal funding, and local political context influence both attitudes toward and actual acceptance of cannabis-related funding. Results show that smaller and younger organizations appear to exhibit greater openness to cannabis-related donation acceptance. Additionally, mission alignment and the beneficiary population—particularly organizations serving youth—are the strongest predictors of rejection, whereas federal funding is also associated with reluctance. Contrary to expectations, political context does not significantly influence decisions. The findings highlight the normative and resource-dependence pressures through which nonprofits assess and legitimize emerging sources of controversial funding.

接受或拒绝:影响非营利组织对大麻产业慈善事业回应的因素
随着大麻产业参与慈善事业,非营利组织面临着是否接受此类捐赠的复杂决定。虽然之前的研究主要集中在受污行业的企业捐赠背后的动机,但对于潜在的接受者如何评估这些捐赠,我们知之甚少。本研究利用制度、利益相关者和合法性理论,探讨了影响非营利组织对大麻慈善开放的组织和背景特征。利用来自科罗拉多州300多家非营利组织的调查数据,我们研究了规模、年龄、使命、服务人口、联邦资金和当地政治背景等因素如何影响人们对大麻相关资金的态度和实际接受程度。结果显示,较小和较年轻的组织似乎对大麻相关捐赠的接受表现出更大的开放性。此外,使命一致性和受益人群——特别是为年轻人服务的组织——是拒绝的最强预测因素,而联邦资助也与不情愿有关。与预期相反,政治背景对决策没有显著影响。研究结果强调了规范和资源依赖的压力,非营利组织通过这些压力来评估和合法化新兴的有争议的资金来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信