Caught between two worlds: Big 4 professionals moving to non–Big 4 firms

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Laurence Daoust, Candice T. Hux, Aleksandra B. Zimmerman
{"title":"Caught between two worlds: Big 4 professionals moving to non–Big 4 firms","authors":"Laurence Daoust,&nbsp;Candice T. Hux,&nbsp;Aleksandra B. Zimmerman","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.13057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Researchers have studied the entry of professionals into the public accounting field, their careers at an organization, and their exit from the field. However, they have largely overlooked the mobility of these professionals, whose careers involve firm transfers. Drawing on Bourdieu's sociology and interviews with 31 transferees and 7 non–Big 4 legacy partners, we examine the move of Big 4 professionals to non–Big 4 firms. Our findings show that transferees have an ingrained belief that a Big 4 career is the ideal professional trajectory. But they experience points of disjuncture at these firms, prompting them to reevaluate this organizational illusio and their career aspirations and ultimately reinforcing their transfer decision. After moving, transferees learn by trial and error how to valorize and layer their habitus and different forms of capital in order to adjust to the non–Big 4 firms. Our findings challenge prior assumptions about the superiority of Big 4 professionals and the distinctive forms of their capital by showing that the capital needed to obtain powerful positions at Big 4 and non–Big 4 firms are similar, but that its nature and relative value varies. Our findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic in which transferees' Big 4 habitus and capital undergo a complex, iterative process of valorization and layering when these professionals move within the public accounting field. This contrasts with a materialization of professional domination that occurs when former Big 4 employees move outside the public accounting field. For most of our transferees, dissonance also develops between the Big 4 and non–Big 4 layers of their habitus, and they never completely deconstruct their organizational illusio. These findings reveal that the reflexivity of transferees is both shaped and limited by their Big 4 habitus and illusio. Overall, our results contribute to the understanding of professional mobility within the public accounting field.</p>","PeriodicalId":10595,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Accounting Research","volume":"42 3","pages":"2156-2187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1911-3846.13057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1911-3846.13057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers have studied the entry of professionals into the public accounting field, their careers at an organization, and their exit from the field. However, they have largely overlooked the mobility of these professionals, whose careers involve firm transfers. Drawing on Bourdieu's sociology and interviews with 31 transferees and 7 non–Big 4 legacy partners, we examine the move of Big 4 professionals to non–Big 4 firms. Our findings show that transferees have an ingrained belief that a Big 4 career is the ideal professional trajectory. But they experience points of disjuncture at these firms, prompting them to reevaluate this organizational illusio and their career aspirations and ultimately reinforcing their transfer decision. After moving, transferees learn by trial and error how to valorize and layer their habitus and different forms of capital in order to adjust to the non–Big 4 firms. Our findings challenge prior assumptions about the superiority of Big 4 professionals and the distinctive forms of their capital by showing that the capital needed to obtain powerful positions at Big 4 and non–Big 4 firms are similar, but that its nature and relative value varies. Our findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic in which transferees' Big 4 habitus and capital undergo a complex, iterative process of valorization and layering when these professionals move within the public accounting field. This contrasts with a materialization of professional domination that occurs when former Big 4 employees move outside the public accounting field. For most of our transferees, dissonance also develops between the Big 4 and non–Big 4 layers of their habitus, and they never completely deconstruct their organizational illusio. These findings reveal that the reflexivity of transferees is both shaped and limited by their Big 4 habitus and illusio. Overall, our results contribute to the understanding of professional mobility within the public accounting field.

夹在两个世界之间:四大会计师事务所的专业人士跳槽到非四大会计师事务所
研究人员研究了专业人员进入公共会计领域,他们在组织中的职业生涯,以及他们退出该领域。然而,他们在很大程度上忽视了这些专业人员的流动性,他们的职业生涯涉及到公司的调动。借助Bourdieu的社会学和对31名被转移者和7名非四大的传统合伙人的采访,我们研究了四大专业人士向非四大事务所的转移。我们的研究结果表明,被转移者有一种根深蒂固的信念,即四大职业是理想的职业轨迹。但是,他们在这些公司经历了脱节的时刻,促使他们重新评估这种组织幻觉和他们的职业抱负,最终强化了他们的转岗决定。在跳槽之后,被转移者会通过不断的尝试和错误来学习如何调整自己的习惯和不同形式的资本,以便适应非四大公司。我们的研究结果表明,在四大会计师事务所和非四大会计师事务所获得强大职位所需的资本是相似的,但其性质和相对价值有所不同,从而挑战了之前关于四大会计师事务所专业人员优势及其资本独特形式的假设。我们的研究结果揭示了一个矛盾的动态,即当这些专业人士在公共会计领域内移动时,被转移者的四大习惯和资本经历了一个复杂的、反复的增值和分层过程。这与四大会计师事务所前雇员离开公共会计领域时出现的专业支配的具体化形成了鲜明对比。对于我们的大多数被转移者来说,他们的习惯中的四大和非四大层之间也会产生不和谐,他们从来没有完全解构过他们的组织幻想。这些发现表明,被转移者的反身性既受到四大习惯和错觉的影响,也受到它们的限制。总体而言,我们的研究结果有助于理解公共会计领域的专业流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) is the premiere research journal of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association, which publishes leading- edge research that contributes to our understanding of all aspects of accounting"s role within organizations, markets or society. Canadian based, increasingly global in scope, CAR seeks to reflect the geographical and intellectual diversity in accounting research. To accomplish this, CAR will continue to publish in its traditional areas of excellence, while seeking to more fully represent other research streams in its pages, so as to continue and expand its tradition of excellence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信