Effect of Intraoperative Posture on Accurate Diagnostic Rate of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Esophagectomy

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Masami Yuda, Keita Takahashi, Yoshitaka Ishikawa, Takanori Kurogochi, Akira Matsumoto, Naoko Fukushima, Takahiro Masuda, Naoto Takahashi, Fumiaki Yano, Ken Eto
{"title":"Effect of Intraoperative Posture on Accurate Diagnostic Rate of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Esophagectomy","authors":"Masami Yuda,&nbsp;Keita Takahashi,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Ishikawa,&nbsp;Takanori Kurogochi,&nbsp;Akira Matsumoto,&nbsp;Naoko Fukushima,&nbsp;Takahiro Masuda,&nbsp;Naoto Takahashi,&nbsp;Fumiaki Yano,&nbsp;Ken Eto","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The benefits of intraoperative nerve monitoring for identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves during esophageal cancer surgery have recently been reported. However, no standardized procedures have been established for the use of this system. This study aimed to identify factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and explore approaches to improve the precision and efficiency of intraoperative nerve monitoring in esophageal cancer surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 187 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018, of whom 142 underwent intraoperative nerve monitoring. We evaluated factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overall incidence of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was 22% (32/142). Univariate analysis identified the left lateral decubitus position (vs. prone position) and not using video laryngoscope during intubation as risk factors for discrepancies between intraoperative nerve monitoring findings and postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy diagnosis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the left lateral decubitus position (odds ratio: 4.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.09–13.4, <i>p</i> = 0.019) and not using video laryngoscope during intubation (odds ratio: 9.51; 95% confidence interval: 2.94–15.9, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were independent risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy diagnostic discrepancies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Adequate contact between the intubation tube and vocal cord muscles is crucial for effective intraoperative nerve monitoring during esophagectomy. Additionally, the intraoperative posture significantly affects diagnostic outcomes and should be carefully considered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"9 5","pages":"920-925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The benefits of intraoperative nerve monitoring for identifying recurrent laryngeal nerves during esophageal cancer surgery have recently been reported. However, no standardized procedures have been established for the use of this system. This study aimed to identify factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and explore approaches to improve the precision and efficiency of intraoperative nerve monitoring in esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods

We analyzed 187 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018, of whom 142 underwent intraoperative nerve monitoring. We evaluated factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative nerve monitoring for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

Results

The overall incidence of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was 22% (32/142). Univariate analysis identified the left lateral decubitus position (vs. prone position) and not using video laryngoscope during intubation as risk factors for discrepancies between intraoperative nerve monitoring findings and postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy diagnosis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the left lateral decubitus position (odds ratio: 4.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.09–13.4, p = 0.019) and not using video laryngoscope during intubation (odds ratio: 9.51; 95% confidence interval: 2.94–15.9, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy diagnostic discrepancies.

Conclusion

Adequate contact between the intubation tube and vocal cord muscles is crucial for effective intraoperative nerve monitoring during esophagectomy. Additionally, the intraoperative posture significantly affects diagnostic outcomes and should be carefully considered.

Abstract Image

术中姿势对食管切除术术中神经监测准确率的影响
背景食管癌手术中术中神经监测对喉返神经识别的益处最近有报道。但是,没有为使用这一系统制定标准化程序。本研究旨在探讨影响喉返神经麻痹术中神经监测诊断准确性的因素,探讨提高食管癌手术术中神经监测的准确性和效率的途径。方法对2011年至2018年187例连续行食管切除术的患者进行分析,其中142例进行术中神经监测。我们评估影响术中神经监测对喉返神经麻痹诊断准确性的因素。结果术后喉返神经麻痹发生率为22%(32/142)。单因素分析发现,左侧侧卧位(相对于俯卧位)和插管时未使用视频喉镜是术中神经监测结果与术后喉返神经麻痹诊断差异的危险因素。多因素分析证实,左侧侧卧位(优势比:4.24;95%可信区间:1.09 ~ 13.4,p = 0.019)和插管时未使用视频喉镜(优势比:9.51;95%可信区间:2.94 ~ 15.9,p = 0.001)是喉返神经麻痹诊断差异的独立危险因素。结论食管切除术中气管插管与声带肌群的充分接触是术中有效监测声带神经的关键。此外,术中姿势显著影响诊断结果,应仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信